MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: 123, any improvements?  (Read 17932 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2012, 11:36 »
0
in order to maintain the same commission in future.. one needs to reach contributor level 5, that's 12 month credit total 5,000 - 19,999, what does it means does it mean I need to have a $5000 for 12 month total minimum?

it means 123RF now

"Gives a stable, measureable, predictable and most important of all, specific milestones for achieving targets.
Fosters healthy competition for new and old contributors alike."

It means you have to average over 13 credits a day - either 13 sub and small sales, or some other mix according to the schedule posted on the captcha page. Of course they won't tell you exactly how many RC you have any given month or anything. The $ you earn are not exactly correlated to the credits, and it can vary widely.

For example with just .36 subs you could hit 5000 RC with 1800$
For .60 large sales 5000 RC would be $1000
For 1.50 large sales it would take $2500

Obviously there would be some sort of mix. Of course with the "healthy competition" I shouldn't help explain any of this to you anymore.


« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2012, 11:56 »
0
in order to maintain the same commission in future.. one needs to reach contributor level 5, that's 12 month credit total 5,000 - 19,999, what does it means does it mean I need to have a $5000 for 12 month total minimum?

you cannot make the maths that fast, I would say around half of that, it depends on the licenses you sell

Subscription
1
S
1
M
2
L
3
XL
4
XXL
5
XXL TIFF
10
EPS
10
100MB TIFF
20
200 MB TIFF
40
300 MB TIFF
60
Print EL
50
Electronic EL
75
Comprehensive EL
100
Multiseat
25

« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2012, 12:02 »
0
why come out with contributor level that's so difficult to understand? so the 1 credits is not equal to $1, where can we see the credits we accumulate?

« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2012, 12:11 »
0
why come out with contributor level that's so difficult to understand? so the 1 credits is not equal to $1, where can we see the credits we accumulate?


you cannot, its the IS system but without telling us the accumulated

http://davidgilder.com/misc/123RF_credit_calculator.html

« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2012, 13:28 »
0
Hmmmm... interesting stuff....
but I notice that at 123 the basic sub is 36c. At FT most sales are 23 or 27 cents - surely even worse.
Any thoughts?
I've abandoned uploading to FT as the rates are SO low and the upload process such a pain. But the 123 commission planned cut also stinks....

This will be the subs next year.

12 Month Credit    Total Earnings Per Download (Subscription)

0 - 249                          $0.216

250 - 999                       $0.252

1,000 - 1,999                 $0.288

2,000 - 4,999                 $0.324

5,000 - 19,999               $0.360

20,000 - 49,999              $0.374

50,000 - 99,999              $0.389

100,000 - 499,999          $0.403

500,000 - 999,999          $0.418

1,000,000 and above      $0.432

« Reply #30 on: May 29, 2012, 13:37 »
0
why come out with contributor level that's so difficult to understand? so the 1 credits is not equal to $1, where can we see the credits we accumulate?

because they will not tell you

wut

« Reply #31 on: May 31, 2012, 05:16 »
0
This will be the subs next year.

12 Month Credit    Total Earnings Per Download (Subscription)

0 - 249                          $0.216

250 - 999                       $0.252

1,000 - 1,999                 $0.288

2,000 - 4,999                 $0.324

5,000 - 19,999               $0.360

20,000 - 49,999              $0.374

50,000 - 99,999              $0.389

100,000 - 499,999          $0.403

500,000 - 999,999          $0.418

1,000,000 and above      $0.432

This really is absurd. You have to redeem 1 mil credits, while the largest sized JPG costs 5 credits. At IS you have to get 1,2 mil to get to the top level, but you get 20-25 credits for XXXL DLs. Not to mention you get payed 3x more for them anyway and actually sell 10x more (volume depends on your port of course, but I'm sure 99% of the ppl that have equally sized ports at both sites sell a lot more at IS)

« Reply #32 on: May 31, 2012, 05:33 »
0
So as long as we sell a lot more there next year than we do with istock, everything's fine :)  They might adjust these targets a bit in out favour to make it easier to swallow.  I'm tired of that old trick though, if they cut my commission and my earnings go down, I'll stop uploading.  They're not a big earner for me.

« Reply #33 on: May 31, 2012, 10:55 »
0
... Apart from even that, there's the heavy discounting, IF in fact they're really discounting.  Looking at a sample of some of my earnings for just the large size, the royalties all vary.  

At $1.07 per credit, a large size image costs the buyer $3.21.  At 50% commission, I should receive $1.61 for each. ..

A sale today made me take a look at some of this month's sales to see what sort of discounting of credit prices was going on. I wasn't happy with what I saw.

If you look at their prices, they offer credit prices as low as 68 cents a credit via web purchases - so we would get 34 cents a credit from those sales. I don't much like that, but the actual prices per credit go way, way lower. They're offering a 42% discount on those (supposedly rock-bottom) prices based on royalties I've seen just looking at May's stats. 40 cents a credit, or thereabouts. That leaves us with 20 cents a credit in royalties (under the current scheme).

There's no reason to think the discounts will go away Jan 2013, so they'll be paying even lower than 50% of 40 cents a credit to many contributors.

I saw my royalty at 80 cents for an XL, 60 cents for L and $1.00 for an XXL. There were some smaller discounts - an XL for $1.13 which means the buyer got a 17% discount on the 68 cents "minimum" credit price.

At 60 cents for a large, that's what I used to get from IS in 2004 when the prices were $1/2/3 and we got 20 cents/40/60 for S-M-L

The idea that 123-rf is lowering even these wretched royalties come January is just shameful.

grafix04

« Reply #34 on: May 31, 2012, 12:01 »
0
... Apart from even that, there's the heavy discounting, IF in fact they're really discounting.  Looking at a sample of some of my earnings for just the large size, the royalties all vary.  

At $1.07 per credit, a large size image costs the buyer $3.21.  At 50% commission, I should receive $1.61 for each. ..

A sale today made me take a look at some of this month's sales to see what sort of discounting of credit prices was going on. I wasn't happy with what I saw.

If you look at their prices, they offer credit prices as low as 68 cents a credit via web purchases - so we would get 34 cents a credit from those sales. I don't much like that, but the actual prices per credit go way, way lower. They're offering a 42% discount on those (supposedly rock-bottom) prices based on royalties I've seen just looking at May's stats. 40 cents a credit, or thereabouts. That leaves us with 20 cents a credit in royalties (under the current scheme).

There's no reason to think the discounts will go away Jan 2013, so they'll be paying even lower than 50% of 40 cents a credit to many contributors.

I saw my royalty at 80 cents for an XL, 60 cents for L and $1.00 for an XXL. There were some smaller discounts - an XL for $1.13 which means the buyer got a 17% discount on the 68 cents "minimum" credit price.

At 60 cents for a large, that's what I used to get from IS in 2004 when the prices were $1/2/3 and we got 20 cents/40/60 for S-M-L

The idea that 123-rf is lowering even these wretched royalties come January is just shameful.

Well this is interesting and I think together we just let the cat out of the bag.  You see 0.68 per credit.  Well let me tell you that the price per credit varies in different countries.  I had a look at their site from different servers in different countries and they're all different and they don't convert accurately from currency to currency.  Very interesting indeed!  We've been asking for an explanation on these credits for years and not once has Alex mentioned this. 

From an old thread:

Hi All,

I shall explain pricing.

The scenario :
Our cheapest package = $15 for 15 credits.
Price per credit = $1 / credit
50% share to you = $0.50 / credit

If customer purchases an S size image from you, you'll get $0.50. Clear?
If the customer purchases an XXL image from you (5 credits), you'll get 5 x $0.50 = $2.50 for that image downloaded.

Of course, we have discounts, loyal customers, customer who want a big discount as they've been with us for a very long time, so we then discount them for bulk purchases. Nevertheless, we will go through the same calculations and contributors will get 50% of the effective credit price.

So where does the $0.20/credit come from? These credits come from our PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES such as the case of giving away CREDITS to prospective clients whom we think require a bit of a test drive on the 123RF system before they make their first purchase. A demo if you like, we give these out at our discretion. The client DID NOT PAY for these credits, it's given to them courtesy of 123RF.com.

Therefore, seeing as 123RF is giving away these credits, it comes out from our Advertising and Promotions Budget and there is a cost attached to it - 20 cents per credit given away.  I do hope you'll see this a bonus from your business partner 123RF as the prospective client did not pay for them in the first place.

As I have maintained many times before, 123RF Limited is running a business, we are not here to give away to charity nor as some have eloquently put it - "screw" our contributors.

Thank you for maintaining your objectivity on this matter. If there are any questions, you can always email us : [email protected]

P/S - Forums were closed because we decided to shift to Facebook. They have excellent searchable threads there.

Alex

What about the different pricing in different countries, Alex?  Did that slip your mind.  Why would you hide this?  Is this your way of making a little extra under the table ;) 

Dodgy!  They're based Hong Kong so I shouldn't have expected anything less! 

« Reply #35 on: May 31, 2012, 13:12 »
0
BME at 123RF for me in May.

grafix04

« Reply #36 on: June 01, 2012, 08:34 »
0

Well this is interesting and I think together we just let the cat out of the bag.  You see 0.68 per credit.  Well let me tell you that the price per credit varies in different countries.  I had a look at their site from different servers in different countries and they're all different and they don't convert accurately from currency to currency.  Very interesting indeed!  We've been asking for an explanation on these credits for years and not once has Alex mentioned this.  


No-one commented on my little finding.  I get it.  Everyone is happy because of a great month at 123rf (including myself) so we don't want to talk about it.

But I've dug out this little bit in red so we can discuss it next time we have a bad month and need something to b-itch about.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2012, 08:37 by grafix04 »

wut

« Reply #37 on: June 01, 2012, 14:29 »
0

Well this is interesting and I think together we just let the cat out of the bag.  You see 0.68 per credit.  Well let me tell you that the price per credit varies in different countries.  I had a look at their site from different servers in different countries and they're all different and they don't convert accurately from currency to currency.  Very interesting indeed!  We've been asking for an explanation on these credits for years and not once has Alex mentioned this.  


No-one commented on my little finding.  I get it.  Everyone is happy because of a great month at 123rf (including myself) so we don't want to talk about it.

But I've dug out this little bit in red so we can discuss it next time we have a bad month and need something to b-itch about.

Nothing really surprises me anymore about them. They're the biggest thugs and thieves in the industry. I'd trust a Moroccan street hustler more (I've just had the most terrible trip over there, with the biggest ripoffs I've ever seen). They deduct their promo discounts from out share, lied about royalties staying the same if you had over xy sales, added a disgusting spin while they broke the promise they gave just a month before that etc. But I don't care. My sales are slowly dropping there and I'd hate them just us much if I had a BME there

Lagereek

« Reply #38 on: June 01, 2012, 14:45 »
0
What I faile to understand here is this: we are not talking about one of the major sites here, everyone seems to be extremely unhappy, earning peanuts and when royalty falls, even worse.  So why lingering on, why not just bail out?  heck! by the sound of it, you would probably do better at one of the low-earners.
I dont get it? ::)

grafix04

« Reply #39 on: June 02, 2012, 06:24 »
0
We're not talking about a low earner either.  They're currently number five on my list overall.  This month they came in 3rd.  I will be dropping them next year if they go ahead and drop commissions.  I won't take a penny less than what they give me now because prices are so low.  I suppose we're lingering on hoping they have a change of heart.  It won't be difficult to drop them but I prefer not to if they come clean.  I doubt they will but I'm still hopeful.

As for the issue I raised above in red.  I've been trying to work out what these "discounts" are for a couple of years now.  I just worked out they're discounting by country.  Why wouldn't I want to share that fact with others who have been scratching their heads for as long as I have? I want to know more about these price variances.  I want to know (or be convinced of) how they handle these variances.  Are we being ripped off?  One way or the other, it will make it easier to stick around if they don't drop the commissions, or make it easier to leave if they do.   

I suppose I want to figure out whether I don't trust them due to their lack of transparency or whether I genuinely believe they're crooks.

« Reply #40 on: June 02, 2012, 07:24 »
0
Not to change the subject...maybe I should start a new thread....but I think 123 is the most likely one to get "absorbed" in the industry consolidation.  They are not too big, and big enough to be taken off the market.  As I think through consolidation, who cares about DP, CanStockPhoto, SF, AYCS, etc...they are small gnats comparatively.  But 123 is just big enough to be a target for SS or FT.  I can see SS wanting to move their customers (in as much as possible) to BigStock, or kill BigStock and use 123, calling it a merger of 'super powers' lol....something silly like that.  FT, maybe snags 123, shuts them down, gets some of their buyers and is able to suck more blood out of the contributors. 


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
30 Replies
9629 Views
Last post August 15, 2006, 20:47
by Greg Boiarsky
2 Replies
2928 Views
Last post June 07, 2007, 06:47
by CJPhoto
0 Replies
1704 Views
Last post May 14, 2008, 16:45
by News Feed
41 Replies
11338 Views
Last post November 13, 2009, 18:16
by epantha
0 Replies
5764 Views
Last post February 09, 2014, 02:31
by Jo Ann Snover

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors