pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: First rejections @ 123  (Read 1090 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 25, 2012, 07:08 »
0
So, 117 images online with no rejects but latest 2 are rejected.  There doesn't appear to be a reason given and the images concerned are certainly better than many of those accepted.  Do folks in general experience a degree of inconsistency here / are there any particular types of image that are more likely to get a reject?


Wim

« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2012, 07:38 »
0
No all good here, unlike SS and DT who are really starting to get on my nerves.
I have none of your 3D stuff but my all composites get accepted.

Sales are good too and review time is pretty quick lately, no complaints whatsoever.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2012, 07:40 by Wim »

CD123

« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2012, 09:22 »
0
If you are on your history page, look at the bottom right of the screen where your totals summary is displayed. Click on the rejected images count and you will get a display with every image and on the right the reason for rejection (they always give reasons for rejections). Only had 1 time without and that was when my total upload was corrupted.

Further, they are probably one of the most consistent sites in respect of reviews I submit to.

« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2012, 11:11 »
0
Ah...  My bad, showing as royalty free rejects but accepted as editorial  :-[

The reviewer may have mistaken the figure for a real person without a model release - how does one contact support - site mail?

CD123

« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2012, 11:16 »
0
Ah...  My bad, showing as royalty free rejects but accepted as editorial  :-[

The reviewer may have mistaken the figure for a real person without a model release - how does one contact support - site mail?

It caught me also the first time they accepted my images under editorial.

Look under the menu (bottom of screen) under support. The words "Contact" is a hyper link to support page  ;) :D

« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2012, 07:18 »
0
Thanks cd123 - did that and already they are accepted as RF (really impressed with speed of response).  Looks like they approved as both now :)

Wim,

One of the crazy aspects of the extreme "quality = technical quality" culture is that some sites apply the same criteria to a complex composite as to an isolated tomato and reject for tiny flaws that can only be seen when doing an inch by inch review at 100%.

PhotoDuneMicrostock Insider

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
1666 Views
Last post June 16, 2006, 23:58
by Quevaal
2 Replies
296 Views
Last post January 10, 2013, 22:22
by tab62
18 Replies
980 Views
Last post August 02, 2013, 16:47
by tab62
58 Replies
2883 Views
Last post January 03, 2014, 12:34
by Mantis
60 Replies
2351 Views
Last post February 03, 2014, 21:14
by ArenaCreative

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors