Agency Based Discussion > Alamy.com

Improving discoverability

(1/7) > >>

Brasilnut:
I'm making a huge effort to turn almost 3000 images from poor discoverability to good without spamming. Not easy. 

Anybody else had more success after doing so?

I'm using the following keywording tool which seems excellent:

https://www.keyword.io/tool/stock-photo-research

ShadySue:
Word on the forum is that it makes no difference. I certainly won't waste my time imagining possible tangential keywords. It's  a stupid invitation to spam. Because of the way their search works, I get enough false hits there already.

Chichikov:

--- Quote from: ShadySue on July 28, 2017, 11:24 ---Word on the forum is that it makes no difference. I certainly won't waste my time imagining possible tangential keywords. It's  a stupid invitation to spam. Because of the way their search works, I get enough false hits there already.

--- End quote ---

I agree, it is really only a waste of time.
The only way to get the "high discoverability" is to put more that 45 keywords I think, including 10 supertags.
But most of the images (mine) don't need 45 keywords.

Pauws99:

--- Quote from: ShadySue on July 28, 2017, 11:24 ---Word on the forum is that it makes no difference. I certainly won't waste my time imagining possible tangential keywords. It's  a stupid invitation to spam. Because of the way their search works, I get enough false hits there already.

--- End quote ---
Agree also by adding "tangential" keywords you will probably reduce the ctr which might affect your ranking. This and their half hearted attempt at categories seem rather daft.

sharpshot:
I'm just slowly doing the supertags.  Only 2 images optimised out of 2800.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page