Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2012, 09:44

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: upsizing still ok?  

(Read 766 times)
stockastic


« on: April 24, 2011, 10:54 »

Now that Alamy no longer requires monster files, I've started submitting. But a few of my images are still rejected for being below their size limit.  They're maybe 20 MB uncompressed, and they're good images that wouldn't suffer from being upsized.  It's still ok to upsize for Alamy, right?  Actually I don't think there's no any way a reviewer would ever detect it. 


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
microstockphoto.co.uk


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2011, 11:51 »

Yes, they say it here: http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/digital-camera-images.asp

"If necessary, interpolate (upsize) the file to 24MB using a specialist, professional software package. If you have a camera that is capable of producing an uncompressed 8 bit file size of over 24MB then leave it that size"


Ignore | Logged


microstockphoto.co.uk


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2011, 11:51 »

deleted (double post)


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
IS rejection for upsizing
iStockPhoto.com
madelaide 3 1069 Last post October 31, 2007, 16:53
by madelaide
upsizing jpg's
Alamy.com
boatman 12 2387 Last post December 25, 2007, 07:58
by boatman
Isn't upsizing nonsense? « 1 2 »
Alamy.com
olikli 38 4538 Last post February 23, 2010, 19:57
by Phil
Upsizing
Newbie Discussion
sauron 6 843 Last post November 28, 2010, 11:34
by patrick1958
Upsizing for Large Prints
General Photography Discussion
ComfortEagle2095 14 679 Last post March 26, 2012, 19:12
by MatHayward

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc