Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2012, 19:16

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Reviewers are a joke  

(Read 726 times)
Slovenian


« on: November 04, 2011, 04:00 »

" Reason: •     severe vignetting..sorry..."

Yeah, added vignette to a couple of images accepted everywhere you ff-ing muppet!  Roll Eyes

Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Michael Lancaster


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2011, 06:44 »

lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.


Ignore | Logged


CoisaX


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2011, 06:49 »

I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   Grin

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2011, 08:33 »

Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   Grin
Not many (Americans) know how to spell "amateur" right. They are even too dumb to use a spell-checker.


Ignore | Logged


Slovenian


« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2011, 09:31 »

lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Yeah especially on a site like this. But then again, I can't see getting such a rejection at any of the "serious" (established and big) sites Smiley


I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   Grin

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

Lol, they'd almost kill me with such a rejection as well. That being said I'd rather get a real rejection reason like that, then the cover up named LCV or a random rejection the inspector clicks at the moment he sees a shitey photo Wink (or what he thinks is a lousy photo)

I won't worry about it, I'll focus more on the work I do. I wouldn't even bother with such sites, but since I didn't shoot a lot, I said to myself I might as well try and get an extra 20-30$ or so on a site like this every month

Logged


avava

New Member


« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2011, 22:20 »

lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Yeah especially on a site like this. But then again, I can't see getting such a rejection at any of the "serious" (established and big) sites Smiley


I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   Grin

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

Lol, they'd almost kill me with such a rejection as well. That being said I'd rather get a real rejection reason like that, then the cover up named LCV or a random rejection the inspector clicks at the moment he sees a shitey photo Wink (or what he thinks is a lousy photo)

I won't worry about it, I'll focus more on the work I do. I wouldn't even bother with such sites, but since I didn't shoot a lot, I said to myself I might as well try and get an extra 20-30$ or so on a site like this every month

BS is nice to me.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2011, 10:30 by avava »

Ignore | Logged


Mantis
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2011, 19:09 »

Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   Grin
Not many (Americans) know how to spell "amateur" right. They are even too dumb to use a spell-checker.

I know how to spell immature and you fit that bill pretty well.


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Most anal reviewers?
General Stock Discussion
melastmohican 9 1345 Last post April 18, 2008, 14:47
by Waldo4
Reviewers
General Stock Discussion
rjmiz 15 2191 Last post May 28, 2008, 18:13
by runamock
Does anyone know how these reviewers work?
General Stock Discussion
litifeta 17 2626 Last post November 12, 2008, 17:15
by AVAVA
Watermarked images got by the reviewers
Dreamstime.com
eppic 0 627 Last post May 26, 2009, 11:41
by eppic
getty reviewers
General Stock Discussion
chasmcn 9 2169 Last post June 15, 2010, 12:20
by yuliang11

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc