Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2012, 22:57

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » New Sites / Low Earners » Crestock.com » Crestock uploads

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: Crestock uploads

(Read 2276 times)

josh_crestock

« on: October 08, 2007, 01:22 »

#link

Good morning microstockers,

In the past month at Crestock, we've seen a doubling and close to a tripling in the amount of submissions coming in. The quality of the submissions has also raised significantly also. This is great, and we'd like to thank you and congratulate you on your efforts.

However, the recent surge has caught us by surprise a little bit, whilst we're recruiting the right amount of help to inspect your uploads, that takes a few weeks to come into effect. We ask for a small amount of patience while we're striving setup the framework to give you the fastest turnaround from your uploads in the industry.

Thankfully, we've had zero technical problems and this is just down to a lot of new people investing a small amount of time and their photos in Crestock. And, guys, we really appreciate the momentum with which you're all uploading, so keep uploading and we'll try and rise to the challenge.

Best Regards/Med vennlig hilsen,

Josh
The Crestock Team


	Logged

Karimala

« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2007, 12:38 »

#link

Thanks for letting us know, Josh! :-)


	Ignore \| Logged

« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2007, 17:57 »

#link

Josh,
I had a few technical problems uploading some stuff last week, a lot of files went through the process but there's no image attached when I try to complete the process, and 24 of my files said 'out of memory'.
I did send two messages to your support but haven't had any reply yet.
-Richard


	Ignore \| Logged

josh_crestock

« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2007, 12:11 »

#link

RTimages,

We've processed that batch today, though, unfortunately all we could really suggest there would be to try uploading those images again. It sounds as though it was most likely an isolated incident. However, if it happens again, let support know so that we can send a report to the programming team.

Hope you have a better time of it next time round.

Josh


	Logged

« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2007, 18:00 »

#link

Thanks for the reply, it was a large batch and now I've looked at the rejection page they all say the same thing 'no image attached', I'll have a go with some smaller batches to see if that works.
-Richard


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2007, 14:32 »

#link

Is it my impression (or my mistake taking notes otherwise), or have older rejections been approved? And I mean really old, because I haven't uploaded in months!

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

sharply_done

« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2007, 15:13 »

#link

Quote from: madelaide on October 18, 2007, 14:32

Is it my impression (or my mistake taking notes otherwise), or have older rejections been approved? And I mean really old, because I haven't uploaded in months!

Regards,
Adelaide

Yep, it's true.


	Ignore \| Logged

josh_crestock

« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2007, 07:51 »

#link

Thats true, madelaide. We have a quality control on inspections, so, we constantly are checking thru uploader's portfolios of rejected photos searching for good photos that have slipped thru the inspection process.

We believe having a high standard is important to building a good collection of photos. Though quality control on that is a very important part of the process. Unhappy contributors is really bad business.

While, under optimal circumstances, we should send an email out every time we review or approve some rejections... though we don't always have the time, especially when its a matter of 1 or 2 pictures.

Best Regards,

Josh


	Logged

Pixart

« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2007, 08:06 »

#link

Are you saying that you keep in the database of photos that have already been rejected? What if the contributer has sold one of those refused photos exclusively elsewhere and you've now made it available in your database?

I don't actually sell at Crestock so maybe it's not my place to comment on a Crestock thread, but Josh, aren't you opening yourself up to some legal consequences?


	Ignore \| Logged

josh_crestock

« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2007, 08:48 »

#link

That seems like a worthy point. We'll look into this a bit more. Though, I can't imagine it being too much of a problem as contributors are free to remove pictures at will, before it becomes an issue.

In all cases where the rejected pictures are from a few months ago get reviewed, an email should be sent notifying the uploader. Though reviewing pictures from months ago happens very rarely, and usually only at the uploaders request.

The quality control happens more within a day or two of the initial inspection, where theres no issue of the picture becoming exclusive..

Thanks for your feedback, we welcome further thoughts on this.


	Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2007, 14:33 »

#link

Josh,

I received no message about the approvals, I only noticed it because, upon checking the new site, I saw I had 66 images online, while I was sure I had only 60, and noticed some had just a couple of views.

A good surprise anyway, of course. Feel free to re-evaluate other rejections...

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	Dreamtime uploads Dreamstime.com	fintastique	2	1261	April 06, 2006, 16:41 by leaf
	FTP uploads StockXpert.com	bbettina	0	750	January 14, 2008, 02:22 by bbettina
	Lag time on keywords of new uploads iStockPhoto.com	chumley	3	696	June 15, 2008, 00:41 by chumley
	Which sites require regular uploads? General Stock Discussion	melastmohican	6	1487	September 10, 2008, 17:25 by MicrostockExp
	Uploads and Downloads Dreamstime.com	RH	7	1320	October 01, 2008, 15:34 by RH

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.4
Fotolia	34.8
Dreamstime	26.6

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.5
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.1
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.6
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.7
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
Imagegate
ViscoImages
iRockStock
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-24

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]