MicrostockGroup

You know I guess I had given up thinking that Crestock has put their head in the sand and does not address their members needs and wants or even answer any questions anymore.
No one knows who the staff is anymore.
I really think that the company had good potential and at one time seemed to be doing great but they have changed in a negative way.
Everyone is pretty hard on them and it seems that they would try to change everyone's attitude and want people to be proud to be a part of their agency.
I have not given up on them. I have not submitted to them in a long time though.
Kinda been sitting on the sidelines and waiting to see what happens.

I am sitting on the sidelines too.  The only reason I am not uploading is the $0.25 subs commissions.  I never had a problem with reviews there, it is up to them what they accept and reject.  I didn't get many rejections.  They do spend lots on advertising and have reasonable sales, much better than some of the sites that people here like.  I just don't want to see lots of $0.25 subs any more.  It is frustrating to see one site holding back subs commissions and I will have to close my account if they don't do something by the end of the year.  It has been a log wait and my patience is running out.

me too, no longer uploading for $0.25 (and opted out istocks subs too)
I actually just went a had a decent look around the site (never really bothered before ) browse contributors was interesting. order all time sorts by sales opening each person (if you could be bothered) shows size of port and total number of sales. surprised to find I'm number 80.  also surprising when comparing a few portfolios by newest first to dreamstime.  seems there is a number of 'big' people not uploading anymore.  I also looked at rejection rate, and found that I actually have a worse rate at istock then crestock.  

?? I didn't get that joke

It's not a joke.

Really?!!  Josh went exclusive at istock?  Surprising. 

I wonder if he will be an admin there.  Anyone have a link to him on istock?

I just don't understand why they dont try to do better and communicate with their submitters like the others do. All I see is videos from Yuri by Crestock. I imagine they pay him well for them. I dont understand the point of them or why they would pay Yuri to do them. I think their money would be better spent on someone answering emails and doing customer service.

See http://www.microstockgroup.com/blog-updates/10-things-i-would-not-live-without-tools-for-a-complete-microstock-workflow/msg0/

Crestock showed they didn't give a rat's ass on what we said with the Judge. From the forum many had voiced to get the Judge fired or else they quit Crestock. That was quite some time ago. The Judge is still there, and I suppose that's Crestock 's way of giving us all the finger.
Someone also mentioned that they don't give a hoot how many deleted their accounts because many will never reach payout. That makes a whole lotta sense because it means 100% earnings go into their pocket.
Personally, I like, no corrections, I used to like Crestock. Their standard is very high and they pick different images from what the Big 6 pick. The mystery is what the Judge picks, cos it's usually something horrible and almost laughable (much like you know which other site with their unique images in lightbox,etc...)

Anyway, it's all water down the plynth as it's unlikely Crestock will ever care about what you think. Incidentally, about Josh. I think he was the only cool dude there. But we know many other cool dudes too who used to work for horrible sites.

btw, did anyone see the featured lightbox on IS ? coins out of focus , clock with bad dof,etc... I thought they rejected stuff like that due to "blur" ,etc.
Has IS really changed that much ? Can anyone tell me how those images got approved, never mind got to be featured. (ffs, what . do I know? )