Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 02:23

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Print

Topic: ‘BTV’ Released – Cutcaster’s Untapped Photo and Vector Collection  

(Read 12517 times)
johngriffin
« on: August 04, 2009, 10:01 »

August 4, 2009 - San Francisco, California

From their new headquarters in foggy San Francisco, Cutcaster is proud to introduce its much-ballyhooed ‘BTV’ (BTV) photo and vector collection to creative professionals today.  Take a sneak peak at ‘BTV’ by going to www.cutcaster.com/crescendo.

“Creative professionals deserve a better experience when searching for and purchasing content. What Cutcaster provides is better search, better results, better rights offering and all at better market prices,” Cutcaster founder John Griffin explained.  “We introduced ‘BTV’ our first premium collection, to highlight the amazing quality of work in our marketplace and show buyers how easy the website is to use.”

The best of the best included in the BTV photo and vector collection were hand-picked by our highly-caffeinated reviewers and industry professionals for their uniqueness, execution and overall quality. The diverse collection will have graphic designers, creative professionals and photo buyers singing from the top of the closest mountain peaks.

‘BTV’, Irish for “mountaintop,” gives creative professionals looking for exceptional imagery a new and untapped source of photos and illustrations priced by the free market.  Inclusive of both exclusive and non-exclusive contributors, the BTV collection will expand over time. Contributors may also request a file be added to the collection but every file included must pass an intense inspection process and meet the collection’s strict acceptance criteria. "The Cutcaster flexible pricing model provides a unique and hard-data insight into the market value of stock photos,” Lee Torrens, a stock photography insider observed.  “‘BTV’ is a welcome opportunity for all stock photography and illustrators to see our higher value images lifted to another level."

Prices range from $1 for small sizes up to $35 USD for XXL. Sellers set the price for the BTV files. If a buyer wanted to name their price, they are always free to bid on any of the images if they have more time or are working with a smaller budget.

“We haven’t even come close to hitting our peak yet but I’m excited by the growth of sales, which have been doubling every month and also by the number of great photographers we are fortunate enough to be working with and trust us to represent their work.  Our diverse collection is on the verge of breaking 400,000 royalty free images and illustrations and the ‘BTV’ collection will be one more way we can promote our great library to buyers,” Griffin added.

In other news, Cutcaster announced that the increase in revenues has been re-invested into advertising and marketing and more customer service help, which continues to be an industry leader.  The number of Corporate Accounts and buyer sign-ups has been growing faster over the last 6 months because buyers like the flexible payment options, easy to use search and invoicing capabilities. Cutcaster released figures that buyers bid on content around 6% of the time and on average bid 40% less than the listed price for the largest file size.  The time it takes for a typical seller’s response to a proposed bid has averaged 81 minutes and buyers have accepted the final price 43% of the time.

In addition, Cutcaster released new features that include scaled pricing for different file sizes so buyers now have a choice over what image size they want.  Also Cutcaster improved its search functionality and introduced a new suggestive search tool that shows buyers as they type in a keyword what other keyword options are available.

For more information on the ‘BTV’ see www.cutcaster.com/BTV or email [email protected].

About Cutcaster
Cutcaster has tapped into a new and unique source of photo and vector illustrations that can be purchased for any kind of publishing, web design project, printing brochures, advertising, annual reports or electronic usage on websites and presentations. Cutcaster created the first model that adds structure to support licensing user-generated photography and vectors when you don't have the budget to create it yourself.  Sellers can set their prices or those new to the world of licensing can use the Cutcaster Algorithm to find the fair market price.

Visit www.cutcaster.com for more information.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2010, 00:45 by johngriffin »

Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
RT

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2009, 10:30 »

Hmmm I'd be interested to see what iStockphoto have to say about you using the term Vetta in your collections title.

And even though I don't qualify to submit to the iStock Vetta collection I must say your 'Better than Vetta' title is a bit cheap and rather pathetic IMO, especially for a site with so few sales, why not work on improving your sales with serious established marketing instead of tacky cheap phrases.


Ignore | Logged


travismanley


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2009, 10:32 »

Hey John,

Good to know istock isn't the only site out there with a "premium" collection. Thanks for including a couple of my photos.


Ignore | Logged


massman



« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2009, 10:45 »

Hmmm I'd be interested to see what iStockphoto have to say about you using the term Vetta in your collections title.

And even though I don't qualify to submit to the iStock Vetta collection I must say your 'Better than Vetta' title is a bit cheap and rather pathetic IMO, especially for a site with so few sales, why not work on improving your sales with serious established marketing instead of tacky cheap phrases.

I have to agree with Richard here.

I admire your 'go-get' attitude John but this just looks a bit wrong.


Ignore | Logged


RT

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2009, 10:50 »

I've just taken a quick look at your 'Better than Vetta' collection, the images aren't exclusive, and they cost more in your collection than they would on one of the established successful sites for the same size!!

So in short maybe your ad should read "Better than Vetta - the same stuff from the same contributors thats available elsewhere but this time it's more expensive" and I'd suggest you remove the terms 'untapped' and 'unique source' from your statement because neither really apply.



« Last Edit: August 04, 2009, 10:52 by RT »

Ignore | Logged


cidepix



« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2009, 11:17 »

I am OK with cutcaster having a premium collection but man, What's that name?!

I don't like the name. Seriously, this is killing me!

- Hey, wassup?!
- It's Betta than vetta?!

Please remove it! Can't look at it anymore  Grin


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2009, 11:18 »

I thought it was supposed to be a joke post.  No one else read it that way?


Ignore | Logged


bittersweet


« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2009, 11:25 »


I thought it was supposed to be a joke post.  No one else read it that way?

Unfortunately, it's for real. I posted a link to it in the Vetta thread earlier today, before this announcement post. Should be interesting to see the response from Getty Images, or maybe it will just be kept between the attorneys.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2009, 11:27 by whatalife »
Logged


Magnum


iStock Gauge
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2009, 11:29 »

It´s ok. when I see some of my old work, I wonder why . did I...

Change the name and forget Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2009, 12:01 »

"Irish for mountaintop"?  Cmon, that reads like an Onion news story...


Ignore | Logged


Maui


« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2009, 12:25 »

Mmmmh... Is it April Fools' Day again?


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2009, 12:27 »

If it isn't a joke, all it will do is 1. Get them in trouble with istock who, I am sure, has the name trademarked or something, and b. Send people out there wonering what 'Vetta' is, only to find a source of previously unseen content.

It's like an inside joke, but the buyers aren't in on it.


Ignore | Logged


bittersweet


« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2009, 12:31 »

John comes up with some idea

Really? Is that what happened?

Logged


stockastic


« Reply #13 on: August 04, 2009, 12:34 »

I doubt IStock has been able to trademark an Italian noun.




Ignore | Logged


willie


« Reply #14 on: August 04, 2009, 12:37 »

Jokes aside Monsieur Griffin, the last time some site  (hint: Photo Shelter) got into the rink with Getty ... you know what happened?  Might I suggest you check out ebay for a very very large torpedo, should you aspire   to blast Getty/Vetta out of the water Wink
But it's funny , nonetheless!



Ignore | Logged


puravida



« Reply #15 on: August 04, 2009, 12:39 »

I doubt IStock has been able to trademark an Italian noun.




lol, agree stockastic.
not unless Getty has italian :connections:   Grin
last i looked, they are still based in calgary, ab... not milan IT
 Wink
« Last Edit: August 04, 2009, 12:41 by obladihell »

Ignore | Logged


cidepix



« Reply #16 on: August 04, 2009, 12:42 »

If it isn't a joke, all it will do is 1. Get them in trouble with istock who, I am sure, has the name trademarked or something, and b. Send people out there wonering what 'Vetta' is, only to find a source of previously unseen content.

It's like an inside joke, but the buyers aren't in on it.


This will make cutcaster 2nd biggest traffic source after sxc.hu. Maybe they just gave up on sales and decided to be an affiliate of istockphoto.

and o - bladi - hell, wassup bro!  Cheesy

I do like john's efforts but he could have come up with a better name. This name is bad, and it is good he hears it now.


Ignore | Logged


bittersweet


« Reply #17 on: August 04, 2009, 12:44 »

I doubt IStock has been able to trademark an Italian noun.




What?  Huh I thought it was Irish!  Cheesy

Logged


puravida



« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2009, 12:46 »


and o - bladi - hell, wassup bro!  Cheesy

I do like john's efforts but he could have come up with a better name. This name is bad, and it is good he hears it now.

ya right ...cidepix bud .
en serio, methinks John should avoid any word that rhymes with  :

PASTA

or

crappy

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


ShadySue
« Reply #19 on: August 04, 2009, 12:48 »

I doubt IStock has been able to trademark an Italian noun.

What?  Huh I thought it was Irish!  Cheesy

Nope, Italian.
And as for trademarking, Apple did a good job with a common English noun.  Angry


Ignore | Logged


cidepix



« Reply #20 on: August 04, 2009, 13:04 »

ya right ...cidepix bud .
en serio, methinks John should avoid any word that rhymes with  :

PASTA

or

crappy

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

All he should avoid is "emulation"

Other than that, he can use whatever word he wants. It's not like he can not come up with something original. Why are we talking about istockphoto now, if this is original.

Betta than Vetta = Plain BAD = Truth hurts


Ignore | Logged


stockastic


« Reply #21 on: August 04, 2009, 13:35 »

I googled for .5 seconds and found all sorts of products and enterprises named "Vetta".  It's the Italian equivalent of Acme.

I think John Griffin can call this "Betta than Vetta" if he wants, although I think just "Betta" would get the idea across and would be funnier.    "Betta" would also play nicely off the image of the beautiful tropical fish by that name.

« Last Edit: August 04, 2009, 13:48 by stockastic »

Ignore | Logged


WarrenPrice

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2009, 13:37 »

Old MacDonald had a farm....

I don't know about trademark issues and lawyers.  I just see the strategy.  How could you get more attention than going right at the big guy?  Go for it, John.  Win or ... GO DOWN IN A BLAZE OF GLORY.   Cool


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #23 on: August 04, 2009, 13:51 »

I doubt IStock has been able to trademark an Italian noun.


I'd check the (TM) by the collection name in the June 24th press release: http://www.istockphoto.com/press_release.php .  I'd guess the lawyers would not let them do that without it being ... correct.  Does that help?


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #24 on: August 04, 2009, 13:52 »

Nope, Italian.
And as for trademarking, Apple did a good job with a common English noun.  Angry

We were just making fun of the press release linked above where it said it was Irish.  Thus, my thoughts the whole thing is a joke.

Man, I have never seen such sour grapes and whining.  You guys are all really bitter today.


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc