Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 02:23

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » New Sites / Low Earners » Cutcaster » New watermark at Cutcaster- Do you like it better?

Pages: [1]

Topic: New watermark at Cutcaster- Do you like it better?

(Read 927 times)

johngriffin

« on: December 22, 2008, 19:21 »

#link

http://cutcaster.blogspot.com/2008/12/new-watermark-better-than-old-one.html

I'd love to hear your thoughts and how we can improve it if we need to from a sellers point of view. The buyers I have spoken to seem to think this will work for what they need.


	Ignore \| Logged

sharpshot

« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2008, 04:33 »

#link

Hi John, I like to see the name of the site on the watermark. I have seen people use the watermarked image on their website illegally and these get noticed if the company has their name on the watermark. Did you see the examples here? http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2008/12/dude-youre-getting-pink-slip.html


	Ignore \| Logged

gbcimages

« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2008, 13:41 »

#link

I also would like to see the name


	Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	LuckyOliver Watermark LuckyOliver.com	StockManiac	5	3755	October 18, 2006, 20:02 by pixelbrat
	Should I bother with a watermark? General Stock Discussion	Whiz	5	882	August 31, 2007, 16:35 by fintastique
	Mostphotos.com watermark « 1 2 » General Stock Discussion	Arian	27	4197	January 25, 2008, 05:12 by sharpshot
	Moving watermark. Is it useful? 123RF	Alatriste	5	1827	March 27, 2008, 16:07 by Alatriste
	Fotolia Watermark General Stock Discussion	Digital66	5	1982	July 31, 2009, 16:12 by madelaide