pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Stupid Rejections  (Read 5901 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Carl

  • Carl Stewart, CS Productions
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2011, 19:58 »
0
I tend to shoot rather loosely (composition-wise) because it's my understanding that graphic artists like to have some copy space.  Did that change?


« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2011, 20:22 »
0
I believe the whole point of this thread was that DT has stupid rejections.  On this point, I agree.  I have had images of Amur Tigers rejected when one had the mouth open wide and the second had the mouth closed.  To my way of thinking, that is two entirely different images.  Granted, it is roughly the same pose and same lighting but one with open mouth wide and one with closed mouth seems like very different images.

Then again, i have seen one guys port. that has about 40 images of the same boy playing in the field with a ball.  Same ball, same park, same grass; seemed a bit overkill for me.  I couple understand 4-5 images; boy with ball in air, boy with ball on ground, boy with ball in hands, etc but 40 images.

« Reply #27 on: February 21, 2011, 03:45 »
0
they try to keep their database compact... but still you never know what the client will need


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
19 Replies
4348 Views
Last post January 29, 2009, 07:26
by Phil
103 Replies
16707 Views
Last post May 19, 2009, 23:50
by KB
18 Replies
3922 Views
Last post October 17, 2009, 20:28
by holgs
Stupid policy!

Started by fritz « 1 2  All » Dreamstime.com

25 Replies
6333 Views
Last post March 31, 2011, 01:28
by Xalanx
27 Replies
1773 Views
Last post January 06, 2013, 01:02
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors