Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 15:32

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » Top Tier - Big 4 » Dreamstime.com » Upload limit increased at Dreamstime

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: Upload limit increased at Dreamstime

(Read 2216 times)

packerguy

« on: May 13, 2009, 11:25 »

#link

The following announcement on dreamstime website:

May 13, 2009 (09:48)
Contributors: Upload limit is now increased from 100 to 150


	Ignore \| Logged

willie

« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2009, 12:24 »

#link

isn't the limit dependant on your approval rating? 65% = 100 , 85% = 150 ,etc...


	Ignore \| Logged

Karimala

« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 13:54 »

#link

Where is the announcement? I can't find it.


	Ignore \| Logged

packerguy

« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 14:17 »

#link

Under News and Announcements (in pink lettering)


	Ignore \| Logged

Zeus

« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2009, 14:23 »

#link

Is this because of increase in resources or a decline in submissions? Does anyone know?


	Ignore \| Logged

Xalanx

« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2009, 15:00 »

#link

I would bet on the increase in resources, they hired more reviewers recently. However, I can't upload 150 photos daily, so I'm not affected. I couldn't upload even 100 Cheesy


	Ignore \| Logged

goldenangel

« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2009, 15:09 »

#link

Their reviews seem to take much less time than usual.


	Ignore \| Logged

Karimala

« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2009, 17:07 »

#link

Quote from: packerguy on May 14, 2009, 14:17

Under News and Announcements (in pink lettering)

Um...yeh...I didn't even think to look on the front page! Roll Eyes


	Ignore \| Logged

sharpshot

« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2009, 02:15 »

#link

My rejection rate has gone up a lot lately, so I am uploading less. They reject some of my photos because they already have too many but when I did a search on one, there are none that look like mine. I will concentrate on the other sites for a while.


	Ignore \| Logged

CCK

« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2009, 05:41 »

#link

With the increase of the upload limit my acceptance rate has dropped dramatically. Where I could bargain on one or two rejection for every 100 submissions, I sit with a 40% acceptance rate for this month, every rejection the same reason: "This is a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific." A search reveals that the subject is not that well covered at all. I think the problem lies with new inexperienced reviewers, so I decided to stop uploading at DT for a while.


	Ignore \| Logged

null

« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2009, 01:08 »

#link

Quote from: CCK on May 15, 2009, 05:41

A search reveals that the subject is not that well covered at all. I think the problem lies with new inexperienced reviewers, so I decided to stop uploading at DT for a while.

I have that problem with editorial on DT. Although my best seller there is an editorial (it was accepted early) DT very inconsistently rejected editorial later. Since it drags down your AR and hence position in the search engine, I don't upload editorial there any more. It's better to hold on to what you have.

The name of the game on DT isn't port size but image level.

Quote from: CCK on May 15, 2009, 05:41

"This is a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific." A search reveals that the subject is not that well covered at all.

This is a very annoying rejection reason, since every time I had it, I searched myself and it wasn't well covered at all. My guess is that reviewers don't check but just rely on their subjective gut feeling about coverage - which might be wrong. If the reviewer rejects an image for that reason, one could expect he does at least an objective search first.


« Last Edit: May 17, 2009, 01:19 by FlemishDreams »	Ignore \| Logged

eppic

« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2009, 12:03 »

#link

I've found my acceptance level fairly steady lately (around 75% approval) and the majority of the rejections being the "well covered subject" excuse. Review times seem to be faster though with it being closer to 50 or so hours instead of the previously more common 96 hours.


	Ignore \| Logged

goldenangel

« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2009, 13:14 »

#link

Quote from: FlemishDreams on May 17, 2009, 01:08

Exactly my experience and opinion as well. I had to resubmit a few times quoting results of the search and images get accepted. Of course, the first rejection still counts in the acceptance rate.


	Ignore \| Logged

null

« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2009, 01:23 »

#link

Quote from: goldenangel on May 17, 2009, 13:14

I had to resubmit a few times quoting results of the search and images get accepted. Of course, the first rejection still counts in the acceptance rate.

In a few cases, I didn't resubmit but objected with support about the rejection, with documentation about the (poor) coverage. The rejection was then reversed. I don't think it counts for the AR then, but I'm not sure. Why would you resubmit? I would only do it if there were technical flaws that can easily be corrected, i.e. when the image had been changed.


	Ignore \| Logged

goldenangel

« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2009, 00:08 »

#link

Quote from: FlemishDreams on May 18, 2009, 01:23

Quote from: goldenangel on May 17, 2009, 13:14

I had to resubmit a few times quoting results of the search and images get accepted. Of course, the first rejection still counts in the acceptance rate.

I did it because I was instructed to do so by their support team. I also contacted them in the same way. I know that the support team way worked sometimes for some people, but it didn't work for me.


« Last Edit: May 19, 2009, 00:13 by goldenangel »	Ignore \| Logged

null

« Reply #15 on: May 19, 2009, 00:14 »

#link

Quote from: goldenangel on May 19, 2009, 00:08

Quote from: FlemishDreams on May 18, 2009, 01:23

Why would you resubmit? I would only do it if there were technical flaws that can easily be corrected, i.e. when the image had been changed.

I did it because I was instructed to do so by their support team. I also contacted them in the same way.

Ah they changed policy then. It's a bit unfair since it still count towards you AR and it was their fault.


	Ignore \| Logged

goldenangel

« Reply #16 on: May 19, 2009, 00:25 »

#link

Quote from: FlemishDreams on May 19, 2009, 00:14

Quote from: goldenangel on May 19, 2009, 00:08

Quote from: FlemishDreams on May 18, 2009, 01:23

Why would you resubmit? I would only do it if there were technical flaws that can easily be corrected, i.e. when the image had been changed.

I did it because I was instructed to do so by their support team. I also contacted them in the same way.

Ah they changed policy then. It's a bit unfair since it still count towards you AR and it was their fault.

I agree. This happened a couple of months ago. I'm not sure it's a matter of policy. It could depend on how much is an individual in the support team willing to do at the moment.


« Last Edit: May 19, 2009, 00:31 by goldenangel »	Ignore \| Logged

packerguy

« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2009, 10:55 »

#link

Limits were just increased again.

June 1, 2009 (03:24)
Contributors: we have increased the upload limit to 300. - posted by Tangie


	Ignore \| Logged

Inga

« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2009, 12:52 »

#link

Great!! I wish I had something to upload


	Ignore \| Logged

leaf

Premium Member

« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2009, 14:47 »

#link

Quote from: Perseus on May 13, 2009, 12:24

isn't the limit dependant on your approval rating? 65% = 100 , 85% = 150 ,etc...

yes but when they talk about the limit they are talking about the max amount and then it goes down from there depending on your rating.


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	50 day upload limit StockXpert.com	fintastique	3	943	May 03, 2006, 05:33 by leaf
	Upload limit iStockPhoto.com	yupgp	23	3301	September 30, 2006, 09:03 by kkart
	iStock increased its upload limits iStockPhoto.com	litifeta	15	2265	January 26, 2007, 09:06 by epixx
	Increased upload limits...... iStockPhoto.com	hatman12	6	1366	June 15, 2007, 11:23 by ptlee
	Is it possible to get the image filze size limit increased? Veer	leaf	6	1178	November 09, 2009, 17:10 by Brian O'Shea

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.7
Fotolia	34.9
Dreamstime	26.7

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.6
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.2
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.7
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4.1
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.8
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex
Imagegate
ViscoImages
iRockStock

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-25

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]