MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Animated videos rejected for technical reasons, but why?  (Read 1113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Noedelhap

  • www.colincramm.com

« on: July 28, 2017, 16:00 »
0
I was just checking up on some animations I uploaded to Fotolia several days ago, but to my surprise all 5 were rejected for 'technical reasons'.

Shutterstock accepted the videos, and I've checked the file for errors but I couldn't find any. Since it took me some time to render them I really want them online.
It's a looping 3D animation of skyscrapers, 4K resolution, ProRes HQ. The loop is seamless (I checked twice) and there are no artifacts of any kind. So maybe someone could point me in the right direction; am I missing something here?

https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-29115475-stock-footage-seamlessly-loopable-animation-of-modern-corporate-skyscrapers-with-reflective-blue-windows-the.html


« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2017, 16:04 »
0
No idea why, but all I got was a video of black frames.

k_t_g

  • Made you look!
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2017, 16:52 »
0
I don't like how they story board animated clips.

« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2017, 20:28 »
+2
(DISCLAIMER: I've done quite a bit of CG rendering though not much animation.) Looks perfect me to me. Very nice work. I could see a lot of uses for this. Probably the reviewer just screwed up.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
15 Replies
4894 Views
Last post July 17, 2010, 12:53
by borg
10 Replies
2368 Views
Last post October 07, 2014, 02:17
by Hobostocker
12 Replies
3120 Views
Last post December 27, 2015, 05:27
by cpartisan
2 Replies
993 Views
Last post April 19, 2016, 04:48
by banism24
15 Replies
1520 Views
Last post December 22, 2016, 12:33
by Ilyas

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors