MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: FT counter attacks IS  (Read 4959 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 09, 2014, 10:45 »
+2
front page subs promotion


automatically goes to subs




« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2014, 10:47 »
0
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:05 by tickstock »

« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2014, 10:54 »
+1
I believe they have subs since ever, at least from 2009 they do, anyway the main issue is going straight to subs instead of the regular credits

its the dollar club and now this as well, FT is becoming very interesting!

« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 10:56 »
-1
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2014, 10:59 »
+3
I am just saying they are now showing off even more the subs, when you click on a picture it goes directly to subs not the credits like it used to be so I see it as a counter attack once iStock introduced subs recently

« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2014, 11:06 »
0
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2014, 11:11 »
+1
oh man ok it can be counter attack from IS and then counter attack from FT, happy now? :)

« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2014, 11:19 »
+1
regarding YAY I can tell you for free that sales are very low and I don't see many buyers getting subscription plans at least looking at my 1.93 RPD

that said I don't upload to them since October 2012

« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2014, 11:39 »
+1
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

EmberMike

« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2014, 11:48 »
0
I am just saying they are now showing off even more the subs, when you click on a picture it goes directly to subs not the credits like it used to...

It's not doing that for me.

« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2014, 11:49 »
+2
pretty much its a big mess!

partners sales are reported like quarterly I guess, kind of gave up trying to figure that out

YAY lowest at 0.15 , highest 7.5

Partners lowest at 0.1 (ImageClick), highest 25.15 (Ingram)

have sales from 8 different partners

« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2014, 11:50 »
+1
I am just saying they are now showing off even more the subs, when you click on a picture it goes directly to subs not the credits like it used to...

It's not doing that for me.

US site (UK provider)

Ron

« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2014, 12:48 »
+4
TS is always talking about agencies he doesnt submit to and acts like he knows all ins an outs. Dont get sucked in to his IS/Getty love affair.

« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2014, 13:04 »
-3
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

Ron

« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2014, 13:06 »
+1
Takes one to know one  8)

Shelma1

« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2014, 13:15 »
+1
He calls people trolls and then gets his panties in a twist if you call him one back. Lol. (I waited months before returning the favor.)

« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2014, 13:19 »
0
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

Ron

« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2014, 13:22 »
-1
Tweedle dee and tweedle dumb are two persons, I only see one negative on your comments. What does that make you? Tweedle three?

« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2014, 14:06 »
-2
"FT counter attacks IS"

Yes we all know that IS is ultimately responsible for the sub war.

Shutterstock is the leader in subscription royalty-free imagery

Snip

Shutterstock's pioneering strategy has helped it dominate the image subscription market amid an industry of imitators.

We have earned our spot as the number one subscription imagery site by being inventive and by building our own successful business model, said Jon Oringer, founder and CEO of Shutterstock.

Others try to copy our 25-A-Day subscription, but customers are not fooled."

http://tinyurl.com/ovo9mlp

« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2014, 14:25 »
+3
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

Ron

« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2014, 14:27 »
+2
"FT counter attacks IS"

Yes we all know that IS is ultimately responsible for the sub war.

Shutterstock is the leader in subscription royalty-free imagery


Luis is merely pointing out that soon after IS introduces subs, FT makes subs more prominent on their website. This thread is not about who started Subs first, nor about Shutterstock. This thread is about IS and FT and recent changes. Not about something started in 2004. Get over it.

Ron

« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2014, 14:28 »
0
Exactly, downloads at Shutterstock have been increasing while downloads at higher priced sites have been decreasing.  No wonder all of these companies are introducing very cheap, unlimited, streaming, embed, or monthly subs plans.
  You are doing extremely well as Getty IS exclusive, so why are you moaning in this thread about subs at FT?

« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2014, 14:29 »
+1
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »

Ron

« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2014, 14:31 »
+1
Maybe you would do a lot better if you spread you work more. There is an argument for everything.

« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2014, 14:32 »
+1
.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 22:04 by tickstock »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
2222 Views
Last post December 13, 2006, 01:12
by Egypix
8 Replies
3220 Views
Last post December 12, 2007, 12:27
by Smithore
9 Replies
2774 Views
Last post July 24, 2008, 10:58
by michealo
0 Replies
970 Views
Last post December 27, 2010, 09:38
by ichiro17
20 Replies
3287 Views
Last post June 20, 2018, 07:08
by ShadySue

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors