Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 21:04

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print

Topic: Terrible review acceptance at FT  

(Read 2677 times)
sobm


« Reply #25 on: October 18, 2010, 00:50 »

Gosh! No, I don't go that far back with Fotolia...  Cheesy
But I do still have the impression that there are many awful food pictures accepted, some from mass contributors that really spoil some of the search results. I wish they were stricter, even if it meant saying farewell to my acceptance rate.

hello Pheby:
how to prepare the lighting for those food?they look great  Wink


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Pheby



« Reply #26 on: October 18, 2010, 01:32 »

Thanks! Most important: no flash from the front! Even more important than that is the styling, I think. I'm sure styling is my strongest point. My lighting is even, meaning it has no additional highlights or anything that that would make a shot look more interesting. But I think it suits microstock-style. It takes a lot of time to arrange the props and style the food until it's all just right. Also, I spend a lot of time setting up shooting plans well in advance to get the most out of the ingredients, and then it's shopping and then changing round all the plans because one important ingredient is missing or not quite to my liking. Second best just won't do! Most of the food in my port was actually edible, but sometimes I just don't fancy slices of cold duck or half-done vegetables...
I'm so in love with food photography! I could go on and on and on  Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


sobm


« Reply #27 on: October 18, 2010, 03:05 »

Thanks! Most important: no flash from the front! Even more important than that is the styling, I think. I'm sure styling is my strongest point. My lighting is even, meaning it has no additional highlights or anything that that would make a shot look more interesting. But I think it suits microstock-style. It takes a lot of time to arrange the props and style the food until it's all just right. Also, I spend a lot of time setting up shooting plans well in advance to get the most out of the ingredients, and then it's shopping and then changing round all the plans because one important ingredient is missing or not quite to my liking. Second best just won't do! Most of the food in my port was actually edible, but sometimes I just don't fancy slices of cold duck or half-done vegetables...
I'm so in love with food photography! I could go on and on and on  Cheesy


so i guess your are the chef,shotting food is just your hobby...i dont have ingredients that much like you  Grin


Ignore | Logged


Pheby



« Reply #28 on: October 18, 2010, 03:12 »

No, I do this full-time now. And I'm not a chef, I had nothing to do with food professionally before. I don't even enjoy cooking.  Wink


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Got my first 100% acceptance at SS
Shutterstock.com
litifeta 2 837 Last post March 04, 2007, 04:18
by sharply_done
Terrible week at Fotolia « 1 2 »
Fotolia.com
fauxware 27 3869 Last post February 28, 2008, 20:14
by wollwerth
DPA is distributing pictures with terrible sensor spots
General Photography Discussion
Read_My_Rights 7 1209 Last post August 10, 2009, 17:48
by a.k.a.-tom
Terrible search engine! « 1 2 »
Dreamstime.com
Lagereek 38 3488 Last post February 21, 2010, 08:15
by GeoPappas
Put it to test and terrible!! « 1 2 »
123RF
Lagereek 29 3126 Last post May 31, 2011, 06:15
by sarah2

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc