MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: colour differences from site to site  (Read 4728 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

digiology

« on: June 19, 2007, 13:13 »
0
Who do you think does the best job converting our images for web view? I made these screen grabs to compare the differences.

http://clarkcreative.ca/chicken.jpg
http://clarkcreative.ca/orangestripes.jpg

I think I like SS the best. Colour is close to the original and image is sharper. IS and LO are more saturated while 123 and StockXpert look flat. I know it will look different on everyone's monitor. I was just curious to see what you guys think?


« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2007, 23:30 »
0
I always prefer higher color saturation levels so I like LO and IS.
This posting reminds me of the Kodacrome vs. Velvia debates back in the day (I was/am a Velvia man myself).
« Last Edit: June 20, 2007, 19:06 by yingyang0 »

« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2007, 17:48 »
0
Interesting feedback.  It might be neat to see the differences across different types of images. These images had a lot of red.

« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2007, 07:40 »
0
well - i'll be darned - i had no clue there were such differences in the previews... learn something new every day!

hopefully it isn't happening to the actual images... right?

Bryan, here's a set of blue images for ya to compare:
http://homepage.mac.com/maunger/images/stockSiteColorDiffs.jpg
« Last Edit: June 21, 2007, 07:46 by maunger »

ianhlnd

  • tough men are pussys
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2007, 10:08 »
0
I've noticed differences, but thought it was varying power levels from my generator.   But now you mention it, I think I  like Featurepics colors and definition best.

« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2007, 10:35 »
0
thought it was varying power levels from my generator. 

LOL.... It took me a minute to remember that you live on a boat!   (Don't you?)

digiology

« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2007, 14:49 »
0
hopefully it isn't happening to the actual images... right?

Bryan, here's a set of blue images for ya to compare:
http://homepage.mac.com/maunger/images/stockSiteColorDiffs.jpg



Bryan is this happening to the actual images? I figured it was just the previews.

Thanks Maunger for the blue comparison.  :)

« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2007, 08:49 »
0
You should try looking at your pics sometime on a dodgy CRT monitor, some of them look positively awful. I've tried to show friends at work (back when I was working another job that is) on an office computer - definitely not a way to impress!


 

Related Topics


Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors