MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: "nobody" keyword?!  (Read 9642 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: May 19, 2009, 01:14 »
0
that's ridiculous. I think it'll be simple enough to have -person and -people for 99.99999% of the cases. As it is for most of the searches. Look for yourself and you'll find out that "nobody" is not that popular in fact.
I agree. That's what negative search options are for.


« Reply #26 on: May 19, 2009, 01:44 »
0
I agree. That's what negative search options are for.


I found even an image tagged "cevapcici" with no cevapcici  ;)


bittersweet

« Reply #27 on: May 19, 2009, 05:23 »
0
that's ridiculous. I think it'll be simple enough to have -person and -people for 99.99999% of the cases. As it is for most of the searches. Look for yourself and you'll find out that "nobody" is not that popular in fact.
I agree. That's what negative search options are for.

But that only works if the contributor has used "person" or "people" as a keyword, as opposed to the more specific terms "man" "woman" or the like.

I don't really understand the debate. If you don't want to use it, don't use it. NOBODY is forcing you to. I, and the other hundreds of designers who have been searching at Getty for years and have grown very accustomed to searching in this manner, will continue to find the work of those contributors who have taken the time to understand, rather than taking the time to speculate about how dumb said designers must be.

« Reply #28 on: May 19, 2009, 08:26 »
0
that's ridiculous. I think it'll be simple enough to have -person and -people for 99.99999% of the cases. As it is for most of the searches. Look for yourself and you'll find out that "nobody" is not that popular in fact.
I agree. That's what negative search options are for.

I also agree. So I suggest we teach buyers to search for "hamburger -nobody" if they are looking for some people eating hamburgers.

bittersweet

« Reply #29 on: May 19, 2009, 09:16 »
0
Well I sincerely apologize that some of you just do not get it.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #30 on: May 19, 2009, 14:17 »
0
that's ridiculous. I think it'll be simple enough to have -person and -people for 99.99999% of the cases. As it is for most of the searches. Look for yourself and you'll find out that "nobody" is not that popular in fact.
I agree. That's what negative search options are for.

I also agree. So I suggest we teach buyers to search for "hamburger -nobody" if they are looking for some people eating hamburgers.
Yaaaaaay.
game, set and match.  ;D


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
5329 Views
Last post June 11, 2007, 07:55
by Bateleur
1 Replies
4686 Views
Last post July 06, 2007, 19:41
by HughStoneIan
6 Replies
4078 Views
Last post January 30, 2008, 07:19
by kgtoh
7 Replies
5362 Views
Last post June 17, 2012, 04:44
by gillian vann
1 Replies
1775 Views
Last post April 26, 2015, 09:24
by roede-orm

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors