Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 23:47

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Archiving - Its still not clear  

(Read 703 times)
etienjones


« on: January 13, 2010, 08:36 »

Like many of you here, for each image I have a jpeg file for uploading, a layered PSD file and the original Raw file archived on multiple locations.  What is not clear to me is what file format should I use for the layered file, either a layered Tiff (16) or the proprietary format of PSD?  One mistake I have been making is not using "Backwards Compatibilty" on my PSD files, thus slowing down Bridge previews among other disadvantages.   

From Cambridge In Colour:

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/archival-photo-backup.htm

“Unfortunately, many of the formats used for storing edited photos are also subject to future compatibility issues. Fortunately, this is one area where changing technology can mean you'd like to rework certain images using the latest software and techniques. Just make sure that you also have an archived version of the unaltered original photo.”
“Overall, the only fail-proof solution is to keep your data up-to-date. Every few years it's a good idea to convert file types that are in danger of becoming obsolete.”

I know this has been discussed before but the above quote tells me that it might be unimportant whether a Tiff or PSD is the choice.

Any thoughts from those of you who have thought this through?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
FD



« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2010, 11:00 »

Why use the proprietary PSD format? TIF is open format, lossless too, and has about the same size. I have to admit I use zipped TIF (which is more compact). For photos, why should you save layers?  The flat TIF is enough, unless you do illustrations.

I save: the original CR2, the untweaked JPG from cam, and the final TIF with all the edits. From there I can generate the JPGs for upload. I save on external disks, at least 2 copies. On average, I obtain 30 Gig per month like that, that's one extra 1TB disk per year. Considering the price of disks, that's peanuts. 


Ignore | Logged


etienjones


« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2010, 11:37 »

Why use the proprietary PSD format? TIF is open format, lossless too, and has about the same size. I have to admit I use zipped TIF (which is more compact). For photos, why should you save layers?  The flat TIF is enough, unless you do illustrations.

I save: the original CR2, the untweaked JPG from cam, and the final TIF with all the edits. From there I can generate the JPGs for upload. I save on external disks, at least 2 copies. On average, I obtain 30 Gig per month like that, that's one extra 1TB disk per year. Considering the price of disks, that's peanuts.  

The reason you might want to save the edited copy in layers is in case you want to print the image . . . tweaking while softproofing for a printer's profiles.  You don't really want to print without knowing and correcting for a specific printer's profile.  Not to mention paper profiles.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2010, 11:44 by etienjones »

Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
No clear focal point
General Stock Discussion
rjmiz 13 1826 Last post March 17, 2011, 20:32
by cclapper
No clear center focal point rejection (iStock)
Photo Critique
Zirafek 12 2700 Last post January 07, 2008, 06:38
by Zirafek
Gary Fong cloud and clear diffusion system doubt?
Lighting
.shock 2 2097 Last post May 06, 2008, 19:46
by mantonino
Rejects at 123rf to clear the pending queue? « 1 2 3 »
123RF
jcpjr 67 7257 Last post January 13, 2011, 23:13
by pancaketom
Why does it take so long to clear? « 1 2 »
Alamy.com
bobkeenan 31 1818 Last post April 12, 2012, 19:56
by Anita Potter

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc