Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 23:51

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » Microstock Photography Forum - General » General Photography Discussion » Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.

(Read 2638 times)

« on: December 21, 2009, 11:31 »

#link

Give the reviewers some work. A 26 Gigapix panorama of Dresden, currently the largest photo in the world.

Quote

The picture was made with the Canon 5D mark II and a 400mm-lens. It consists of 1.665 full format pictures with 21.4 megapixel, which was recorded by a photo-robot in 172 minutes. The converting of 102 GB raw data by a computer with a main memory cache of 48 GB and 16 processors took 94 hours. With a resolution of 297.500 x 87.500 pixel (26 gigapixel) the picture is the largest in the world. (stand December 2009)


	Ignore \| Logged

Vonkara

« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2009, 14:06 »

#link

This resolve the problem to find some worthy subject. Now you juste have to crop your panoramas. Nice find !


	Ignore \| Logged

Kngkyle

« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2009, 15:27 »

#link

Insane.


	Ignore \| Logged

leaf

Premium Member

« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2009, 15:54 »

#link

that is crazy zooming in and out.


	Ignore \| Logged

MicrostockExp

« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2009, 17:36 »

#link

Amazing:) a bit smaller but still a 18Gpx photo, in Prague this time:
http://www.360cities.net/prague-18-gigapixels


	Ignore \| Logged

Vonkara

« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2009, 17:55 »

#link

Now that one is nice. Make me want to go in the olympic stadium tower here in Montreal and take a couple of snapshots. Maybe all worthless because of the windows but anyway.


	Ignore \| Logged

eppic

« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2009, 20:14 »

#link

Here's your ticket to making images like that:

http://www.gigapansystems.com/

While 26 giga-pixels might be a bit much, you can still make some pretty skookum images with this baby.


	Ignore \| Logged

« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2009, 23:04 »

#link

Stitched panoramas do well, I noticed. The software also got much better. Did anybody try the stitching package that came with the 5D-MKII?


	Ignore \| Logged

leaf

Premium Member

« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2009, 02:17 »

#link

Quote from: FD-amateur on December 21, 2009, 23:04

Stitched panoramas do well, I noticed. The software also got much better. Did anybody try the stitching package that came with the 5D-MKII?

what? there are stitching packages with the 5D MKII

I have stitched around 6 photos together for microstock panos, just using photoshop, and it works very well. Submitting those to the micros though, they have to be downsized a lot.


	Ignore \| Logged

Read_My_Rights

« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2009, 17:06 »

#link

Still unacceptable for microstock. Sensor spots in the sky. Rejected Sad


	Ignore \| Logged

« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2009, 03:08 »

#link

Quote from: leaf on December 22, 2009, 02:17

what? there are stitching packages with the 5D MKII

I think I made a mistake, sorry.


	Ignore \| Logged

photoBeard

New Member

« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2010, 13:40 »

#link

Now I really want to upgrade for a 5D to a 5D II !!!!! And of course I want their computer to go with that..............


	Ignore \| Logged

WarrenPrice

« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2010, 14:16 »

#link

Quote from: photoBeard on January 31, 2010, 13:40

Now I really want to upgrade for a 5D to a 5D II !!!!! And of course I want their computer to go with that..............

Me too. Computing power is what holds me back from venturing into video. Sad


	Ignore \| Logged

bendicks

« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2010, 16:01 »

#link

Here is my attempt at a multi-image horizontal/vertical build....

Loon Lake Panorama View, located in El Dorado county, California, This shot consists of 36 different images stitched together to form a single image that was 51,444 pixels wide by 8,532 pixels tall. I reduced this image by 50% so that it is 25,944 pixels in width (did'nt have enough memory to convert the full sized image).This was then diced up into 1500 separate images to produce the zooming/panning abilities without downloading a massive image across the internet.

The scroll wheel works to zoom and you can grab the image to slide it around when zoomed in.

http://sierramc.com/zoomloon/

-Don


	Ignore \| Logged

Randy McKown

« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2010, 18:59 »

#link

3 hours of robot shooting + 94 hours stitching together 1,665 photos = 1 really big snapshot ..... potential copyrights, bad composition, limited commercial value, total waste of time LMAO !!!!!!


	Ignore \| Logged

Brandon Seidel

« Reply #15 on: February 01, 2010, 09:33 »

#link

I use CS4 now to stitch my panos, but I use to use a great tool called ArcSoft Panorama Maker. I had version 4 and it did great. It’s very easy to use for beginners also.

Now that I use Lightroom, CS4 is easy also. I just select all the images I want to put together and right click. there is a "Send to CS4 ..." option that makes it easy.


	Ignore \| Logged

« Reply #16 on: February 01, 2010, 10:17 »

#link

Quote from: bendicks on January 31, 2010, 16:01

http://sierramc.com/zoomloon/

Fantastic! (there is a Wall-mart shopping bag at the extreme right Wink

)


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	Artifacts & Noise... How much is too much? Photo Critique	Cricket	19	2577	July 14, 2007, 17:25 by leaf
	Photoshop CS3-Artifacts General Stock Discussion	scoopd	2	1000	December 10, 2007, 08:22 by scoopd
	why my boring photo gets so many view? iStockPhoto.com	stokfoto	4	1064	October 31, 2008, 17:48 by Dreamframer
	My View on the future of IStock as a full-time non-exclusive microstocker « 1 2 ... 6 7 » iStockPhoto.com	kosmikkreeper	172	24392	May 05, 2009, 21:50 by DanP68
	Artifacts at full size rejections at iStock « 1 2 3 » iStockPhoto.com	steheap	60	6908	April 01, 2010, 10:12 by stockastic

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.7
Fotolia	34.9
Dreamstime	26.7

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.6
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.2
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.7
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4.1
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.8
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
iRockStock
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex
Imagegate
ViscoImages

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-25

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]