Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 04:31

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print

Topic: Not very clever buyer  

(Read 2999 times)
Peter



« on: March 05, 2009, 16:03 »

OMG! I have just sold 2 images to the same buyer. Funny thing is that those 2 were exactly the same image, but first he bought larger, than smaller size! LOL! This is pure waste of money, he could resize to smaller if he wanted smaller one. But I like those kind of buyers, they make me more money Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Magnum


iStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2009, 16:17 »

Maybe he felt compassion...


Ignore | Logged


Dreamframer



« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2009, 16:26 »

Maybe he felt compassion...

Hahahaha! Good one magnum Grin

Hey Peter, it happened to some some friends of mine too. I think two of them had double downloads of the same image....two sizes


Ignore | Logged


michealo


« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2009, 16:28 »

OMG! I have just sold 2 images to the same buyer. Funny thing is that those 2 were exactly the same image, but first he bought larger, than smaller size! LOL! This is pure waste of money, he could resize to smaller if he wanted smaller one. But I like those kind of buyers, they make me more money Cheesy

Could have been for two separate jobs, in which case he was being ethical ....


Ignore | Logged


Magnum


iStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2009, 16:36 »

One time, one customer bought two images two times and another time, two customers bough three images one times Wink


Ignore | Logged


null



« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2009, 16:43 »

OMG! I have just sold 2 images to the same buyer. Funny thing is that those 2 were exactly the same image, but first he bought larger, than smaller size! LOL!

How do you know it was the same buyer? Buyers info is private.

Maybe it was a large design company and one of the buyer's colleagues saw the shot and download it smaller size for another project. These big companies really play the game fair. What happens mostly is you get a full size normal download, then an hour later somebody buys an extended license. They want to make sure the shot is OK at 100%.


Ignore | Logged


Dreamframer



« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2009, 17:17 »

@ FlemishDreams
Often there is a name of the buyer him self. I have many images with full names of buyers. So, maybe that's the case here too.


Ignore | Logged


Twist


« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2009, 17:20 »

I've had this happen before and seen it happen with people I know. I think its because they will grab the smallest version to see if they really want it and then end up coming back for a larger version for their actual project.


Ignore | Logged


null



« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2009, 17:20 »

@ FlemishDreams
Often there is a name of the buyer him self. I have many images with full names of buyers. So, maybe that's the case here too.

Where? What site? I never noticed it. Actually I'm quite ignorant about all those sites. Like, I discovered yesterday that Fotolia had a forum  Grin


Ignore | Logged


digiology


« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2009, 17:22 »

Fotolia lets you see the buyers info.

Logged


e-person


« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2009, 18:06 »

If one image goes on a web site, and the other on a report, by contract they do have to buy two images. They have just been honest.
I always get double downloads on IS. XS and then a bigger one. Maybe not exactly always, certainly most of the time, though.

Logged


fullvalue

iStock Gauge
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2009, 19:57 »

If one image goes on a web site, and the other on a report, by contract they do have to buy two images. They have just been honest.
I always get double downloads on IS. XS and then a bigger one. Maybe not exactly always, certainly most of the time, though.


Huh  Which site requires that?  That defeats the whole point of RF.  License it once and use it for multiple projects.

OTH, I have downloaded the small version of a file for a project and then downloaded the large file for future uses.  If a client really likes a file, it's better to license it right away and hold onto it for future use.  You never know when someone may "sell the rights" or deactivate a file for another reason and at these prices better safe than sorry.


Ignore | Logged


tan510jomast


« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2009, 20:11 »

OMG! I have just sold 2 images to the same buyer. Funny thing is that those 2 were exactly the same image, but first he bought larger, than smaller size! LOL! This is pure waste of money, he could resize to smaller if he wanted smaller one. But I like those kind of buyers, they make me more money Cheesy

oh peter, how can you say that?
if a buyer repeated a sale of my image, i would be very thankful. for whatever the reasons; the last thing i would do is say is call them silly, or say they are wasting money .
a fine way to lose a buyer, peter  Cool

Logged


goldenangel


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2009, 20:32 »

Huh  Which site requires that?  That defeats the whole point of RF.  License it once and use it for multiple projects.

As I understand, RF by itself doesn't give permission for unlimited use. That's why there is an option of an extended license.


Ignore | Logged


fullvalue

iStock Gauge
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2009, 21:28 »

Huh  Which site requires that?  That defeats the whole point of RF.  License it once and use it for multiple projects.

As I understand, RF by itself doesn't give permission for unlimited use. That's why there is an option of an extended license.

Unlimited no.  Multiple yes.  A website and brochure for the same small business client would be OK under the standard license on most of the sites.


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2009, 22:54 »

Huh  Which site requires that?  That defeats the whole point of RF.  License it once and use it for multiple projects.

As I understand, RF by itself doesn't give permission for unlimited use. That's why there is an option of an extended license.

It completely depends on the site.  Images from iStock can be used for as many clients as you like, providing you end up within the limits of the license.


Ignore | Logged


Peter



« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2009, 02:14 »

It is undersandeable when someone buy small size, and then large one. It happend many times, not unusuall. But when someone buys first large one, and then small one, that I would call a silly! Cheesy But I dont mind, I like extra money Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


MichaelJay

iStock Gauge
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2009, 04:50 »

Unlimited no.  Multiple yes.  A website and brochure for the same small business client would be OK under the standard license on most of the sites.

Even website for one client and brochure for a different client would be OK under most RF licenses. What you can't do is pass on the license to multiple clients.


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2009, 05:41 »

If one image goes on a web site, and the other on a report, by contract they do have to buy two images. They have just been honest.
I always get double downloads on IS. XS and then a bigger one. Maybe not exactly always, certainly most of the time, though.


Huh  Which site requires that?  That defeats the whole point of RF.  License it once and use it for multiple projects.

I think BigStock does. Or did.

This has happened before, the odd thing in Peter's case was that the smaller size was downloaded AFTER the larger size.  Unless this was just a mistaken way the site recorded it, it is really strange.

Regards,
Adelaide


Ignore | Logged


Perry



« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2009, 07:17 »

I think most RF licences is one licence for each "seat". Maybe the brochure and website were designed by two different persons in the same organization, that would propably require two different licences.


Ignore | Logged


e-person


« Reply #20 on: March 06, 2009, 09:29 »

Huh  Which site requires that?  That defeats the whole point of RF.  License it once and use it for multiple projects.

As I understand, RF by itself doesn't give permission for unlimited use. That's why there is an option of an extended license.

Unlimited no.  Multiple yes.  A website and brochure for the same small business client would be OK under the standard license on most of the sites.

Not for microstock. Read the contract. As it is, I already get paid ridiculous amounts. Every licence is for single usage, up to a certain amount of items, like one magazine up to 250'000 issues. If you want it for two different issues you have to buy two different licences. HELLOOOOO!!!!!

Logged


fullvalue

iStock Gauge
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2009, 10:26 »

I think most RF licences is one licence for each "seat". Maybe the brochure and website were designed by two different persons in the same organization, that would propably require two different licences.

Of course you're right on that count Perry.  I was tihinking in terms of small businesses whose needs are numerous but small and only have one person doing all the work.


Ignore | Logged


anton9



« Reply #22 on: March 06, 2009, 10:47 »

ive had that a few times actually. Always a smaller size sells then 2 mins later a larger files sells of the same image


Ignore | Logged


Pixart


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #23 on: March 06, 2009, 11:16 »

Someone likely needed a smaller version for the web and doesn't have an editing program to resize.  The host of my blog doesn't have any tools to resize photos without distorting - maybe that's the case. 


Ignore | Logged


tempura



« Reply #24 on: March 06, 2009, 11:31 »

Fotolia lets you see the buyers info.

fun ofcourse I went and looked


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Buyer referral
iStockPhoto.com
Fortunefame 1 927 Last post June 04, 2007, 11:48
by vicu
Buyer referral bonus
General Stock Discussion
Fortunefame 6 1264 Last post June 30, 2007, 08:01
by Lee Torrens
I guess the buyer made a mistake
General Stock Discussion
madelaide 13 1876 Last post March 13, 2008, 10:56
by fotografer
Buyer requests additional format.
Dreamstime.com
Zeus 5 1253 Last post February 05, 2009, 11:44
by Zeus
Fotolia not showing buyer info anymore?
Fotolia.com
digiology 19 2401 Last post April 02, 2009, 15:29
by Calamity_John

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc