MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: What Happened to the Photography Industry in 2016?  (Read 4949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chichikov

« on: March 06, 2017, 07:45 »
0


« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2017, 07:54 »
+1
Oh my, I can't stand that guy's voice/accent.

Anyway, surprised? The number of cameras sold is much higher, it's just that they are now placed in smartphones.

Photodune Reject

« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2017, 10:42 »
+1
and if you toss in the Microstock business no wonder photography went to hell... ;)



« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2017, 10:43 »
0
and if you toss in the Microstock business no wonder photography went to hell... ;)

Yes, because the booming microstock industry was the main reason for millions of DSLRs and compact cameras sold throughout the years.

alno

« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2017, 12:12 »
0
and if you toss in the Microstock business no wonder photography went to hell... ;)

Yes, because the booming microstock industry was the main reason for millions of DSLRs and compact cameras sold throughout the years.

Very unlikely. Just imagine crowded place near the Eiffel tower or some air show. Just several people from thousands ones with cameras would contribute to microstock. The most would quietly bury those terabytes on their computers.

« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2017, 13:23 »
+1
and if you toss in the Microstock business no wonder photography went to hell... ;)

Yes, because the booming microstock industry was the main reason for millions of DSLRs and compact cameras sold throughout the years.

Very unlikely. Just imagine crowded place near the Eiffel tower or some air show. Just several people from thousands ones with cameras would contribute to microstock. The most would quietly bury those terabytes on their computers.

That post was SARCASM my friend.  ;)

« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2017, 16:34 »
0
and if you toss in the Microstock business no wonder photography went to hell... ;)
Totally insignicant factor though of course the number of contributors has gone UP

« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2017, 16:38 »
0
To me the surprising thing is Mirrorless cameras are failing to make more impact on SLRs.

Photodune Reject

« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2017, 16:40 »
+2
To me the surprising thing is Mirrorless cameras are failing to make more impact on SLRs.

I find them to be too slow compared to my canan mark IV.

« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2017, 21:55 »
+2
To me the surprising thing is Mirrorless cameras are failing to make more impact on SLRs.

I find them to be too slow compared to my canan mark IV.

I find them to be cheaper compared to your canon mark IV. And the quality is still great ;)

Photodune Reject

« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2017, 22:17 »
+1
To me the surprising thing is Mirrorless cameras are failing to make more impact on SLRs.

I find them to be too slow compared to my canan mark IV.

I find them to be cheaper compared to your canon mark IV. And the quality is still great ;)

and they don't weight 20 lbs thus not killing your neck  lol!  :)


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
4379 Views
Last post April 15, 2007, 08:57
by Kngkyle
Wishes for 2016

Started by Rinderart Shutterstock.com

16 Replies
5542 Views
Last post January 07, 2016, 11:39
by CJH
167 Replies
41524 Views
Last post January 22, 2016, 15:04
by Dumc
10 Replies
6242 Views
Last post January 22, 2016, 12:54
by Steveball
SS 2016 Review

Started by 60D « 1 2  All » Shutterstock.com

42 Replies
9422 Views
Last post January 16, 2017, 15:28
by KuriousKat

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors