Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 03:02

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: A dumb question about exif  

(Read 407 times)
CoisaX


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« on: November 21, 2011, 08:08 »

I sleep few hours last night and could be the main reason to ask:

Is "original" exif removed from our images after they get into agencies database? If not, it is possible an client buy any size and publish it with original exif?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
jsnover
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2011, 10:25 »

I think lots of agencies strip the exif, but there's no requirement that they do it. If there's information in there you don't want the world to see, you would need to remove it prior to uploading rather than hoping every agency does it for you.


Ignore | Logged


CoisaX


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2011, 10:57 »

I think lots of agencies strip the exif, but there's no requirement that they do it. If there's information in there you don't want the world to see, you would need to remove it prior to uploading rather than hoping every agency does it for you.

Ah, isn't about my "photographer secrets"   Grin ( I even share it with photo community )

Just because I find two sites using a web size, and strange or not, they have full original exif. These images were some time ago, at 800px ( almost without watermark ), in a photo forum. If could be a rule in all agencies ( exif removal ), i would be certain that 2 images are being used without fees... And Yes they were removed from that forum much time ago.


Ignore | Logged


RacePhoto



« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2011, 11:53 »

I think lots of agencies strip the exif, but there's no requirement that they do it. If there's information in there you don't want the world to see, you would need to remove it prior to uploading rather than hoping every agency does it for you.

Ah, isn't about my "photographer secrets"   Grin ( I even share it with photo community )

Just because I find two sites using a web size, and strange or not, they have full original exif. These images were some time ago, at 800px ( almost without watermark ), in a photo forum. If could be a rule in all agencies ( exif removal ), i would be certain that 2 images are being used without fees... And Yes they were removed from that forum much time ago.

You have mind of confused me, so I was leaving this alone.

What does the EXIF have to do with the size or the license? If you are asking, do the agencies always remove the EXIF, NO they don't. AT least one used to and not says they will leave it. I never searched for my images to see if they include or have that data removed, in licensed use.

It's also possible that on the agency sites, it doesn't show, but when someone pays for a download, they get it. The buyer could be removing the data... So it's pretty complicated.


Ignore | Logged


CoisaX


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2011, 12:45 »

You have mind of confused me, so I was leaving this alone.

What does the EXIF have to do with the size or the license? If you are asking, do the agencies always remove the EXIF, NO they don't. AT least one used to and not says they will leave it. I never searched for my images to see if they include or have that data removed, in licensed use.

It's also possible that on the agency sites, it doesn't show, but when someone pays for a download, they get it. The buyer could be removing the data... So it's pretty complicated.

I forgot to check my English twice, after write it. Grin

I was just asking if they always remove exif.





 


Ignore | Logged


RacePhoto



« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2011, 00:20 »

You have mind of confused me, so I was leaving this alone.

What does the EXIF have to do with the size or the license? If you are asking, do the agencies always remove the EXIF, NO they don't. AT least one used to and not says they will leave it. I never searched for my images to see if they include or have that data removed, in licensed use.

It's also possible that on the agency sites, it doesn't show, but when someone pays for a download, they get it. The buyer could be removing the data... So it's pretty complicated.

I forgot to check my English twice, after write it. Grin

I was just asking if they always remove exif.


Not a problem at all, I try to read things a few times to see if I can figure out the intent.  Wink

No they don't always remove EXIF, some do some don't. Some that did before, don't anymore. (at least last report was DT was leaving it with files now, I don't know for sure) Some end users remove it.

No answer for sure which isn't helpful very much. Sorry.


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Dumb question about model releases
Shutterstock.com
Greg Boiarsky 2 780 Last post July 04, 2006, 13:16
by Greg Boiarsky
OK, so I am dumb...
iStockPhoto.com
leszek 8 1497 Last post May 17, 2008, 05:53
by Pywrit
I KNOW this is a dumb question
Site Related
riffmax 9 1864 Last post January 09, 2009, 14:22
by pancaketom
Dumb rejections « 1 2 3 »
iStockPhoto.com
stock shooter 63 4918 Last post May 13, 2009, 12:30
by Caz
EXIF Data Taking Away Keywords From Many Images Question
General Stock Discussion
KonaHawaii 3 713 Last post July 01, 2009, 07:39
by DWL

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc