MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Anyone (individual) with 50k+ files online here?  (Read 1986 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: November 09, 2018, 21:37 »
0
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2018, 01:54 »
+1
Yes me ~ now why do you want to know?

derek

    This user is banned.
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2018, 02:25 »
0
Probably one of my mates here who started with Jon back in 2004!  69000 files. He is a single contributor and got myself interested back in late 2005. Although I'm not sure he is very active in micro-stock today? left this forum a few years back.

nobody

« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2018, 07:30 »
+6
Don't forget Laurin -- he invented the MS business from his own garage  8)




Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2018, 10:13 »
+3
NOT HOW MANY IT"S WHAT ARE THEY!

and yes I'm shouting, tired of the same irrelevant question.  ;D Yes these are old, but the data isn't available any longer. 2012

Shutterstock:


iStock: See position four and the number of downloads. That's not because SJLocke had 50k images, but because he had 11,000 outstanding images on IS. 860,000 downloads at that time, 2012! Yes he's here.



Oh wait I see you just wanted to know who has the largest, because size matters? LOL

Another smokin' Duck thread coming...  ;)


« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2018, 12:11 »
0
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Should be " has "

« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2018, 12:18 »
0
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Should be " has "

Correction: Should be "has". That's some careless use of spaces.

But I vote for "has got".

Anyway, thanks for clearing up this complicated situation.

« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2018, 12:28 »
+3
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Should be " has "

Correction: Should be "has". That's some careless use of spaces.

But I vote for "has got".

Anyway, thanks for clearing up this complicated situation.

Surely "got" would be superfluous  in this context.

« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2018, 12:37 »
+1
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Should be " has "

Correction: Should be "has". That's some careless use of spaces.

But I vote for "has got".

Anyway, thanks for clearing up this complicated situation.

Surely "got" would be superfluous  in this context.
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2018, 12:51 »
+2
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".

cascoly

  • Photography, travel & online games at cascoly.com

« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2018, 12:53 »
+2
agency? who most files has?

Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2018, 12:53 »
+2
I was right, dead duck.  ;D

« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2018, 13:00 »
+4
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).

msg2018

« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2018, 13:17 »
+5
unless its a grammar forum ;-).

it's

;-)

« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2018, 21:20 »
0
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.


« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2018, 22:00 »
+1
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.

Yes, I thought about that one.  I think you are right, which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum.

Using comers gives a more natural flow, especially when read out loud.

PZF

« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2018, 02:23 »
0
Comers?
Being ironic?


« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2018, 05:37 »
0
Comers?
Being ironic?

Show on road.
Text a lot?

« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2018, 10:59 »
0
Comers?
Being ironic?

Show on road.
Text a lot?

I like your comers ... even if they aren't correct Engrish.

« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2018, 12:02 »
0
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.

Yes, I thought about that one.  I think you are right, which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum.

Using comers gives a more natural flow, especially when read out loud.
I no longer read out loud to myself...even my lips don't move when I read these days.

Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #20 on: November 12, 2018, 09:45 »
0
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.

Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.

Yes, I thought about that one.  I think you are right, which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum.

Using comers gives a more natural flow, especially when read out loud.
I no longer read out loud to myself...even my lips don't move when I read these days.

I asked myself that the other day. I mean?

"Do you talk to yourself much, when you are alone?"

And I thought, "I've never been with myself when I was alone?"  ;)




 

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors