MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: encrenciel on November 09, 2018, 21:37
-
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Yes me ~ now why do you want to know?
-
Probably one of my mates here who started with Jon back in 2004! 69000 files. He is a single contributor and got myself interested back in late 2005. Although I'm not sure he is very active in micro-stock today? left this forum a few years back.
-
Don't forget Laurin -- he invented the MS business from his own garage 8)
-
NOT HOW MANY IT"S WHAT ARE THEY!
and yes I'm shouting, tired of the same irrelevant question. ;D Yes these are old, but the data isn't available any longer. 2012
Shutterstock:
(https://i.postimg.cc/bNwMpVDv/ss-top-12-feb2012.jpg)
iStock: See position four and the number of downloads. That's not because SJLocke had 50k images, but because he had 11,000 outstanding images on IS. 860,000 downloads at that time, 2012! Yes he's here.
(https://i.postimg.cc/X77kz9zc/is-june-2012-top-ten.jpg)
Oh wait I see you just wanted to know who has the largest, because size matters? LOL
Another smokin' Duck thread coming... ;)
(https://i.postimg.cc/MTKTBH2M/duck-smoking-web-300.jpg)
-
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Should be " has "
-
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Should be " has "
Correction: Should be "has". That's some careless use of spaces.
But I vote for "has got".
Anyway, thanks for clearing up this complicated situation.
-
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Should be " has "
Correction: Should be "has". That's some careless use of spaces.
But I vote for "has got".
Anyway, thanks for clearing up this complicated situation.
Surely "got" would be superfluous in this context.
-
Who got the highest number of files on a single agency here?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Should be " has "
Correction: Should be "has". That's some careless use of spaces.
But I vote for "has got".
Anyway, thanks for clearing up this complicated situation.
Surely "got" would be superfluous in this context.
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
-
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
-
agency? who most files has?
-
I was right, dead duck. ;D
-
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
-
unless its a grammar forum ;-).
it's
;-)
-
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.
-
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.
Yes, I thought about that one. I think you are right, which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum.
Using comers gives a more natural flow, especially when read out loud.
-
Comers?
Being ironic?
-
Comers?
Being ironic?
Show on road.
Text a lot?
-
Comers?
Being ironic?
Show on road.
Text a lot?
I like your comers ... even if they aren't correct Engrish.
-
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.
Yes, I thought about that one. I think you are right, which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum.
Using comers gives a more natural flow, especially when read out loud.
I no longer read out loud to myself...even my lips don't move when I read these days.
-
I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal.
Very efficient indeed, but I wouldn't capitalize "agency".
Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).
Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)
lawls.
Yes, I thought about that one. I think you are right, which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum.
Using comers gives a more natural flow, especially when read out loud.
I no longer read out loud to myself...even my lips don't move when I read these days.
I asked myself that the other day. I mean?
"Do you talk to yourself much, when you are alone?"
And I thought, "I've never been with myself when I was alone?" ;)
(https://i.postimg.cc/rFFMKHYK/rimshot.gif)