Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 02:02

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print

Topic: Chicken - egg dilema  

(Read 1893 times)
melastmohican


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« on: October 26, 2010, 13:18 »

Should I stop uploading to low earning agencies and focus only on top ones since time investment does not justify return or I need to continue to struggle and upload in order to build larger portfolios which may produce better returns?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
stockmarketer


« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2010, 13:36 »

This may not be the type of response you were looking for, but I think this type of answer will be more constructive for you in terms of an effective strategy.

What you should be re-examining is NOT which agencies will produce the greatest return for you.  Looking over your portfolios, and stats such as your downloads per image at Dreamstime, should tell you that the content you're creating is not connecting with buyers.  There's nothing technically wrong with it.  You're a good photographer.  Don't take this as a slam against your skills.  Far from it.

I think the problem experienced by many who frequent this forum is that there's a disconnect between what YOU WANT to upload and what BUYERS WANT. 

Eliminating the smaller agencies from your mix so you can focus more on the ones that could deliver a larger payoff will not get you more sales in the end.  To get more sales, you will have to upload more images that meet the needs of buyers.  Every time you're about to hit Upload on any given site, stop and ask yourself these questions:

Who will buy this?  What will it communicate for the buyer?  What goal does it help the buyer achieve?

If you can't quickly come up with a crystal clear answer to these questions, chances are you will see few if any sales for your new images. 

I hope this doesn't discourage you, or anyone else who reads it.  I'm just trying to offer helpful advice to anyone who has "hit the wall" or is not getting the desired ROI on their time spent in microstock.   The buyers are out there.  There are more than ever before.  The pie is growing, even though your slice of it may be shrinking.  Carve yourself a larger piece by doing a better job than your competitors at figuring out what buyers really want. 

Good luck!


Ignore | Logged


lienkie


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2010, 14:18 »

melastmohican: I understand exactly what you mean , I'm struggling with the same issue Undecided and don't have an answer
stockmarketer: very good info, something all of us must keep in mind and thank you for that. the question still remains that if you have the same images on different sites and on some sites the images sell well but on another agency the same images don't, what do you do? Do you keep uploading in the hope that a bigger and better port would generate more sales or do you stop uploading there and only focus on the sites that give better return.
Sorry, I now almost repeated mohican's post.... Smiley


Ignore | Logged


jsnover
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2010, 14:33 »

In another thread, Lisafx mentioned that 90% of her income came from the top 4 sites. I think for most of us that's roughly true. So while you can add a trickle to your income from the smaller sites, it really doesn't make a ton of difference to your totals.

Before I became exclusive I switched some of the low-earner sites to an intermittent upload status - every 3 to 6 months I'd catch them up with recent stuff in my portfolio.

I think the advice to focus on what sells - at the big 4 - is good.


Ignore | Logged


melastmohican


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2010, 15:08 »

@jsnover: I am slowly evolving to the point when I stick to top 4. I am re-testing some sites every couple months for a month to see if anything has changed.

@stockmarketer: I have been doing microstock for 2.5 years now. I haven't had a single smashing hit photo. I am evolving in this area too. For me SS is 10x better than anything else so my choices, keywording, etc is skewed towards them. I think that over time structure of categories I have been covering has changed. There are probably much less travel and nature shots and more poor man's studio attempts :-) I really like to shoot food but I have no space to have permanent setup for this.


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2010, 15:17 »

new members at MSG everyday and with cool nicknames! Tongue


Ignore | Logged


louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2010, 15:47 »

I haven't had a single smashing hit photo

Interesting what's considered a smash hit. For my portfolio my best seller is now at about 24 dls/month at IS. With 704 total images. The top dls/month on my page two of IS (24 per page) is only 3 dls/month.
My top five sellers at IS are 24.2  16.3   8.8  7.7  and 5.9 dls/month.

So for me if an image is selling 2-3 per month right from the first month I consider it a winner.


Ignore | Logged


Zeus


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2010, 16:11 »

Unequivocally yes. Better spending time creating than uploading.


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2010, 16:13 »

My top five sellers at IS are 24.2  16.3   8.8  7.7  and 5.9 dls/month.
I'm ashamed.  Mine are  2.8  2.0  1.9  1.9  1.4.


Ignore | Logged


melastmohican


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2010, 16:43 »

For me IS is one of these low earners. Uploading is so cumbersome that I was able to have 200 images in 2.5 years. I got only one image that got more than 1DL/m :-) At SS I got few dosens which had 2DL/m. So I guess I am not doing very well :-(


Ignore | Logged


louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2010, 17:21 »

Tracking is too cumbersome on any site except IS. Especially dls/month. It's as if the sites are embarrassed to clearly show you your own results. The nice thing about the dls/month stat is that it leads you to focus on the kinds of shots that do better for your shooting style. In my opinion it also shows you where not to waste your time.
    When I started in this business about 6 years ago I uploaded topics that I was shooting anyway. Mostly landscapes and oddities that I found during my travels. Those images for the most part really sucked in microstock. As I began to put the microstock "hat" on during my travels I shot more and more with commercial use in mind. It was just as challenging as what I was doing before but I had more play value involved when seeing folks actually paying me to shoot. Luckily I don't have to make a living at this stuff but it's nice to get some money recognition for your time.
    Now at art shows I value less the oohs and ahhs about my landscape work and more on the "dollar votes" of the landscape images that actually sell.
    But this business is so screwy. A few years ago I uploaded to IS a landscape image I rejected for any art show display. I had zero expectations. To my surprise it jumped up to 20+ dls/month. It's receded to 16 dls/month this year but is still my number 2 seller.
    I may have set a record for wandering off topic but it's nice to chat and share stuff.


Ignore | Logged


elvinstar


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2010, 18:26 »

Quote
My top five sellers at IS are 24.2  16.3   8.8  7.7  and 5.9 dls/month.

I'm at     10.3     9.0     5.4     4.5     2.7  Sad


Ignore | Logged


corepics
« Reply #12 on: October 26, 2010, 18:41 »

Interesting stats. IS has been performing pretty nicely lately for me (Download wise only), I guess
33,1      24,3     16,1     12,7     10,6   


Ignore | Logged


UncleGene



« Reply #13 on: October 26, 2010, 18:49 »

My top five sellers at IS are 24.2  16.3   8.8  7.7  and 5.9 dls/month.

Lou, are any of top sellers landscapes?


Ignore | Logged


louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #14 on: October 26, 2010, 19:12 »

My top five sellers at IS are 24.2  16.3   8.8  7.7  and 5.9 dls/month.

Lou, are any of top sellers landscapes?

Not really. My 16.3 dls/month is a person sitting on a river bank backlit by a sunset but it would be a stretch to call it a landscape. So my top 48 has zero landscapes. But I make most of my photography income from landscapes. Go figure.


Ignore | Logged


lienkie


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #15 on: October 27, 2010, 01:28 »

Quote
another thread, Lisafx mentioned that 90% of her income came from the top 4 sites. I think for most of us that's roughly true. So while you can add a trickle to your income from the smaller sites, it really doesn't make a ton of difference to your totals
thanx jsnover, I saw lisa's post just after I posted and it does answer the question.... So I am gonna focus on the big four and do the others when I can, have time, feel like it, am bored

Man, your guys rock with downloads per month!! Inspirational to see Smiley
I'm at 1.5   1.5  1.2  1.1 and a whopping 1  Roll Eyes
My "best seller" is a landscape, so yeah...go figure


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #16 on: October 27, 2010, 08:31 »

3.0  2.8  1.8  1.2  1.0


Ignore | Logged


Sign up with Shutterstock
FD



« Reply #17 on: October 27, 2010, 08:50 »

1.3  1.3  1.1  1.0  1.0


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #18 on: October 27, 2010, 09:51 »

Good to know there are people with worse results than me.   Wink


Ignore | Logged


disorderly


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #19 on: October 27, 2010, 10:29 »

Now I don't feel quite so bad.

9.6 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.5


Ignore | Logged


WarrenPrice

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #20 on: October 27, 2010, 10:51 »

Where are these stats coming from? Huh Huh


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2010, 10:53 »

Good to know there are people with worse results than me.   Wink

shame on you!! eheh


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #22 on: October 27, 2010, 10:54 »

Where are these stats coming from? Huh Huh


go to http://www.istockphoto.com/my_uploads.php

then DLs/mo


Ignore | Logged


WarrenPrice

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #23 on: October 27, 2010, 11:02 »

WOW!  had no idea all that was there.
New Toy! Grin

Haven't been w/iStock long enough to have anything meaningful, but do appreciate the info.  Thanks.


Ignore | Logged


VB inc


« Reply #24 on: October 27, 2010, 12:19 »

nice infos... mines mostly vectors but heres mine

36.7
30.9
27.4
26.3
21.3


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Final dilema - Canon vs Sigma
Cameras / Lenses
Peter 8 1530 Last post October 02, 2007, 05:59
by Peter
NEWS - Strobist: How to Break your SB-800’s Little Neck Like a Chicken
SnapVillage.com
News Feed 0 594 Last post August 13, 2008, 11:30
by News Feed
Low tier Agencies - dilema!
General Stock Discussion
Lagereek 16 1557 Last post May 10, 2011, 14:49
by Microstock Posts

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc