MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: copyrights of sporting events  (Read 3149 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 17, 2016, 15:48 »
0
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:28:19 -0500
Subject: RE: General copyright



17 USC 102(a) lists eight categories of works of authorship covered by the act. The list does not include athletic events, and, although the list is concededly non-exclusive, such events are neither similar nor analogous to any of the listed categories. NBA v. Motorola, Inc., 105 F.3d 841 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1997)



The court found that a sporting event was not a creative expression because they are not authored. In theory, sports have no underlying script. Further, the court elaborated that to allow copyright of a sports competition, then figure skaters, whose moves are orchestrated, could copyright their moves, such as the triple lutz, and prevent their competitors from using the same move and that would destroy competition in sports. Similarly, the Copyright Office will not register work out/exercise routines. 805.5(B)(3) Compendium 3rd Edition.



H.R. No. 94-1476 at 52, reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5665. The House Report also makes clear that it is the broadcast, not the underlying game, that is the subject of copyright protection. In explaining how game broadcasts meet the Act's requirement that the subject matter be an original work[ ] of authorship, 17 U.S.C. 102(a), the House Report stated:

                When a football game is being covered by four television cameras, with a director guiding the activities of the four cameramen and choosing which of their               electronic images are sent out to the public and in what order, there is little doubt that what the cameramen and the director are doing constitutes authorship.


 

JS

U.S. Copyright Office

101 Independence Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC  20559-6000

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 877-476-0778 (toll free) or 202-707-5959         

Website:  www.copyright.gov


« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2016, 18:35 »
0
But every logo, trademark, personal image of a celebrity, people in the crowd, design, and anything else at the event are protected from commercial use.

http://www.pdnonline.com/news/Photographer-Settles-3142.shtml

Agencies don't want to pay lawyers to defend, so they make the rules in advance to avoid lawsuits. This doesn't mean people can't license some of the subjects you are protesting. It means the agencies do want to get into expensive litigation.

I know nobody has mentioned this before, but agencies make the rules for us and what they will sell. That doesn't mean that the restrictions are the laws. You need to write yourself a note that says that. Agencies make their own rules.


« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2016, 18:47 »
+3
Aren't you tired of these posts yet?

Here's a plan. Start your own stock image site. Take all the pictures of boats, the Hollywood sign, sporting events etc. Make millions of dollars. Never have a problem again.

Show all the big sites how it is done.


« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2016, 19:44 »
0
yeah and prepare for a lot of complains and suings lol


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
20 Replies
11604 Views
Last post August 26, 2008, 22:03
by yingyang0
30 Replies
14782 Views
Last post March 27, 2012, 13:41
by cascoly
14 Replies
5353 Views
Last post August 07, 2013, 07:57
by Xanox
4 Replies
2895 Views
Last post August 17, 2013, 12:58
by Pixart
5 Replies
2514 Views
Last post September 27, 2021, 07:40
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors