Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 02:34

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » Microstock Photography Forum - General » General Stock Discussion » Dangerous support

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: Dangerous support

(Read 1576 times)

xst

« on: January 12, 2011, 18:10 »

#link

Last week I got several rejections from one site (I don't want to mention which one)

I'm sending message to support, saying that they’ve accepted several images of this type from me in the past and they are selling really-really well.
Also I've sent examples of similar images from other people ports.

Response was brutal. -
Basically: We reviewed your examples and decided to remove them from the site as well.

I've checked – examples from other people ports are also removed.

I've learned my lesson. Never ever again I'm going to appeal.
And I want to apologize to photographers whose images were removed because of this.


	Ignore \| Logged

somethingpretentious

« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2011, 19:27 »

#link

not much info there...lots of mystery though. Maybe you could elaborate on the "type" of images?


	Ignore \| Logged

rubyroo

« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2011, 19:31 »

#link

Was this due to a copyright issue? I can't think of any other issue that would generate such a response.


	Ignore \| Logged

xst

« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2011, 19:40 »

#link

Quote from: rubyroo on January 12, 2011, 19:31

Was this due to a copyright issue? I can't think of any other issue that would generate such a response.

Not copyright.
Images are too sensual and our customers don't need them.
(I do have a lot of very sensual images,
however those were relatively mild – no genitals or nipples are visible)


« Last Edit: January 12, 2011, 19:43 by xst »	Ignore \| Logged

rubyroo

« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2011, 19:45 »

#link

Ah OK. I didn't think of that. I tend to forget there's a whole 'sensual' area in microstock.


	Ignore \| Logged

pet_chia

« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2011, 20:15 »

#link

They didn't realize they had sensual images on their site until you drew their attention to it with a support ticket? LOL.


	Ignore \| Logged

somethingpretentious

« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2011, 20:30 »

#link

lol, saw that coming...watch out for the dangerous boob crack! "its not what we are looking for"..


	Ignore \| Logged

seawhisper

« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2011, 22:23 »

#link

I think it would be nice to know which site was that. Just to know to which support not to write lol.


	Ignore \| Logged

CD123

« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2011, 08:58 »

#link

The feedback from some sites are basically just rude. They have the "I am God" syndrome over their sites and the contributors are basically at there mercy.... My new application to one of the "Low tier" sites was responded to by rejecting all of my uploads (150+) stating that they have a very high quality standard and that my images are basically of inferior quality.

The same images are listed on 7 sites, all higher on the list than them.
They can just as easy reject images/submissions by just saying that it does not suit their site's portfolio or whatever, rather than using their very subjective opinion to put peoples hard work down....


« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 09:09 by CD123 »	Ignore \| Logged

« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2011, 09:10 »

#link

Quote from: CD123 on January 16, 2011, 08:58

My new application to one of the "Low tier" sites was responded to by rejecting all of my uploads (150+) stating that they have a very high quality standard and that my images are basically of inferior quality.

Yes StockFresh is quite tough, unlike StockXpert before. If they have the same reviewers, they must have put them all on Benzedrine. I was accepted very early and I had little rejections but I didn't like the reject reasons ("please upload better quality" when the images were on iStock). That's why they won't make it and that's why I deleted my port there.

Quote from: CD123 on January 16, 2011, 08:58

The same images are listed on 7 sites, all higher on the list than them.

I beg you pardon but with 3 sales on DT in 2 years and none on iStock, I would rather think it's me. Tongue


	Ignore \| Logged

CD123

« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2011, 16:21 »

#link

FD-regular
Do not know where you are getting your info from? Never said the site in question is StockFresh (it is actually not).
"I beg you pardon but with 3 sales on DT in 2 years and none on iStock, I would rather think it's me."
Another wrong presumption. I had a few pics on Dreamstime (5 or so) for 2 years and only started uploading in any quantities to any sites since late Nov. last year.

Point is still, 7 sites are wrong then and only 1 think they known what is quality (nothing to do with my sales)..... Tongue


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	Spam and potential dangerous website in link General Stock Discussion	hospitalera	1	864	September 12, 2006, 11:06 by berryspun
	IS support iStockPhoto.com	madelaide	3	1072	January 21, 2008, 22:03 by zorki
	The Most Dangerous Thing Invented « 1 2 » Microstock News	Pixart	25	5937	September 07, 2010, 19:41 by RacePhoto
	Backdrop support Lighting	eyeCatchLight	4	1021	August 24, 2010, 23:11 by eyeCatchLight
	Traveling to 3rd world countries(where can you go that's not expensive&dangerous « 1 2 3 4 » Off Topic	wut	77	2023	May 20, 2012, 11:47 by wut

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.7
Fotolia	34.9
Dreamstime	26.7

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.6
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.2
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.7
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4.1
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.8
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
iRockStock
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex
Imagegate
ViscoImages

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-26

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]