Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 01:14

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print

Topic: Getty sold a 65K $ image !  

(Read 4368 times)
macrosaur



« on: February 28, 2010, 16:25 »

here's the photo sold on Getty for 65K $, the author also sells on Alamy :






original Alamy thread :
http://www.alamy.com/forums/Default.aspx?g=posts&t=7519


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2010, 16:34 »

great Smiley


Ignore | Logged


macrosaur



« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2010, 16:44 »

great Smiley

in the old alamy thread the author said he hired real elephants for this set, must have been a pricey shoot
but definetely paid off !

take that, microstocks !


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2010, 16:45 »

great Smiley

in the old alamy thread the author said he hired real elephants for this set, must have been a pricey shoot
but definetely paid off !

take that, microstocks !

huge Smiley


Ignore | Logged


cclapper
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2010, 16:46 »

the thread would really make more sense if we could see the photo you are talking about. The link from the alamy forum, for me anyway, says I don't have permission to see.


Ignore | Logged


RacePhoto



« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2010, 16:48 »

Can't see it.

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /files/2010/01/accenturephant1.jpg on this server
.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2010, 16:50 »

the thread would really make more sense if we could see the photo you are talking about. The link from the alamy forum, for me anyway, says I don't have permission to see.
Same here. I think you have to be logged in that forum to see it. I also don't see it here since I adblocked all images on the MSG since Leaf really overdid it with the blinking banners. Horrible, I get a headache from it.  Embarrassed


Ignore | Logged


macrosaur



« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2010, 16:54 »

strange !
it was working 2 minutes ago.

here's a mirror :




or just search "accenture elephant" in Google Images, there's a dozen sites with it.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2010, 17:04 »

strange !
it was working 2 minutes ago.
They probably reconfigured the server against deep links since you can lose a lot of bandwidth by deeplinkers.
I assume the image is photoshopped.  Wink


Ignore | Logged


ShadySue
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2010, 17:32 »

See it here: http://sports.yahoo.com/golf/blog/devil_ball_golf/post/Accenture-Out-with-cruising-Tiger-in-with-surf?urn=golf,213851


Ignore | Logged


mantonino



« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2010, 17:35 »

That has to tick off John Lund who has a TON of great elephant shots! lol


Ignore | Logged


OM


« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2010, 17:36 »

Good on the guy. Bob Elsdale's "behind the camera" link.

http://www.wild-side-online.com/#/public/about/


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2010, 17:43 »

That has to tick off John Lund who has a TON of great elephant shots! lol

lol John is a great artist! Smiley


Ignore | Logged


cclapper
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2010, 17:47 »

Wow, 65K. Sweet!

Great link, OM. Love Rosie the Piglet!


Ignore | Logged


macrosaur



« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2010, 18:04 »

That has to tick off John Lund who has a TON of great elephant shots! lol

lol John is a great artist! Smiley

That's the point and the lesson to learn from that elephant photo.

Artists are able to produce unique images, no matter the competition or the agency or the budget
involved.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2010, 18:11 »

That's the point and the lesson to learn from that elephant photo.

Fine. End next week I'll go to Cloud 9, the surfing paradise on Siargao Island not too far away and take some background shots of surfers and waves. Next, I'll shoot everything I find on 4 legs, photoshop it in and sell it for 0.65$.  Grin
Welcome to µstock. (this is no joke)
« Last Edit: February 28, 2010, 18:16 by FD-amateur »

Ignore | Logged


donding



« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2010, 18:20 »

That's the point and the lesson to learn from that elephant photo.

Fine. End next week I'll go to Cloud 9, the surfing paradise on Siargao Island not too far away and take some background shots of surfers and waves. Next, I'll shoot everything I find on 4 legs, photoshop it in and sell it for 0.65$.  Grin
Welcome to µstock. (this is no joke)

Exactly.....that .65 would not possible without photoshop and the digital camera and vacation time..


Ignore | Logged


Sign up with Shutterstock
FD



« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2010, 18:35 »

Exactly.....that .65 would not possible without photoshop and the digital camera and vacation time..

My most recent EL on SS (last friday) was a shot of a house I took from my kitchen window. I figure the cost of that shoot is slightly less than what Yuri Arcurs spends.  Tongue
Of course, I only have one kitchen window, but you can shoot very salable stock just on the way. My favorites are airports and airplanes. They just cost the clicks of the cam, and they are very difficult to copy.
Everything you shoot in studio can and will be copied, if it sells, and they will steal your title and keywords too.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2010, 18:40 by FD-amateur »

Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2010, 18:38 »

Exactly.....that .65 would not possible without photoshop and the digital camera and vacation time..

My most recent EL on SS (last friday) was a shot of a house I took from my kitchen window. I figure the cost of that shoot is slightly less than what Yuri Arcurs spends.  Tongue
Of course, I only have one kitchen window, but you can shoot very salable stock just on the way. My favorites are airports and airplanes. They just cost the clicks of the cam.


is this a pimping thread?? eheheh


Ignore | Logged


borg


Dreamstime Gauge
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2010, 18:54 »

Compared with this, we are working for free!!!  Tongue


Ignore | Logged


macrosaur



« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2010, 19:13 »

Compared with this, we are working for free!!!  Tongue

hahaha  Grin


Ignore | Logged


mantonino



« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2010, 19:35 »

That's the point and the lesson to learn from that elephant photo.
Artists are able to produce unique images, no matter the competition or the agency or the budget
involved.

I thought what I was saying is that I immediately thought this was Lund's photo - he did the elephants thing but this isn't his = it's not unique. He has a ton of great elephant shots they could have had (and he could have scored with!)


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2010, 20:48 »

Somebody will win the lottery every week.  No different here.


Ignore | Logged


zenpix


« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2010, 22:55 »

Just curious, how much did the photographer take from the $65.000?


Ignore | Logged


borg


Dreamstime Gauge
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2010, 05:19 »

Just curious, how much did the photographer take from the $65.000?

I 'll be satisfied with 6.500 $... Tongue Undecided


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Getty sold
General Macrostock
PaulieWalnuts 8 2650 Last post February 26, 2008, 01:03
by litifeta
Jupiter Sold to Getty
StockXpert.com
stock_fan 1 1363 Last post October 27, 2008, 18:12
by leaf
how can you tell which image sold
123RF
bobkeenan 1 496 Last post March 15, 2010, 21:29
by Talanis
Sold another image license from Flickr
General Stock Discussion
dnavarrojr 16 1771 Last post April 11, 2010, 07:25
by Microbius
Photolibrary sold to Getty
Microstock News
Xalanx 0 549 Last post September 26, 2011, 15:26
by Xalanx

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc