pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Quantity vs quality  (Read 438 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 16, 2017, 22:37 »
0
Would you rather give priority to quantity over quality in this era of microstock where million files are added monthly knowing your "one" super quality image will highly go unseen?


died from overdrawn


k_t_g

  • Fresh tomatoes this way>
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2017, 22:59 »
+1
When people want it, they will find it.
 :)
You just provide them with quality.

« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2017, 00:31 »
0
Why not both? Just not on the same outlets.

« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2017, 01:09 »
0

Why not both? Just not on the same outlets.

What you mean by not on the same outlet?


died from overdrawn

« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2017, 01:23 »
+1
I mean that you can supply "quantity" to micro and "quality" to macro

« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2017, 02:55 »
+3
Quality is highly subjective.  Some of what I think are my best images sell very little but those that I almost didn't upload sell well.  I see a few people with small portfolios packed with images that sell well but I think that would be hard for me to do.  I just upload everything that I think might sell and let the buyers decide.  The best images rise to the top in my portfolio and some of them are a real surprise.

Deciding what to sell on micro and macro sites is tricky as well.  A high quality image on a macro site might never sell or only sell a few times and make less than it would on the microstock sites.


 

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors