MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Sad day for photographers  (Read 35612 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

puravida

  • diablo como vd
« Reply #175 on: August 05, 2009, 12:35 »
0
there ! i put puravida back , with the avatar of a guy, for you and gost to be turned on !  8)


« Reply #176 on: August 05, 2009, 12:46 »
0


No, you didn't miss anything.
You think it's OK for gostwyck to be offensive with one woman, or two..
so it's OK for me to be offensive to you , woman or otherwise.

You cannot play both sides of the fence.
 Either both of us are wrong in being offensive or both of us are entitled to be offensive,
to man or woman, or the homo that gost calls me.
According to gost, I am both man and woman, so I am entitled to be offensive ...
ROFL.



Sorry, you missed my point.  I will try once more because I have some time to waste with you today.  

It isn't the "being offensive" I objected to in Lisa's post, or yours either.  Offensive is a relative term anyway.  

What I object to, is people pretending to be an authority on a subject they know nothing about. That goes for everyone and really has nothing to do with gender at all.

I am not offended by your tone.  I can take it or I wouldn't be here.  Same goes for Lisa4s, Stacey (who you keep alluding to), or anyone else on this forum.  While your attempts at chivalry are rather quaint, these women aren't/didn't ask for your help in defending them.

Gonna have to sign off now.  Got a life to live, and friends and family to spend it with.  Besides, I have a feeling you aren't going to understand this post any more than you have any others.

Give my regards to that next windmill you tilt at, would you Don Quixote?  ;)

ETA:  And here comes puravida moving up on the outside.  Do I see 50%eggs joining in too?  C'mon, it's a party!!  Thanks again for the diversion :D
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 12:48 by PixelBytes »

HerrMursilgo

  • achdulibertzeit eine Ratte mit Flgeln
« Reply #177 on: August 05, 2009, 12:55 »
0


No, you didn't miss anything.
You think it's OK for gostwyck to be offensive with one woman, or two..
so it's OK for me to be offensive to you , woman or otherwise.

You cannot play both sides of the fence.
 Either both of us are wrong in being offensive or both of us are entitled to be offensive,
to man or woman, or the homo that gost calls me.
According to gost, I am both man and woman, so I am entitled to be offensive ...
ROFL.



Sorry, you missed my point.  I will try once more because I have some time to waste with you today. 

It isn't the "being offensive" I objected to in Lisa's post, or yours either.  Offensive is a relative term anyway. 

What I object to, is people pretending to be an authority on a subject they know nothing about. That goes for everyone and really has nothing to do with gender at all.

I am not offended by your tone.  I can take it or I wouldn't be here.  Same goes for Lisa4s, Stacey (who you keep alluding to), or anyone else on this forum.  While your attempts at chivalry are rather quaint, these women aren't/didn't ask for your help in defending them.

Gonna have to sign off now.  Got a life to live, and friends and family to spend it with.  Besides, I have a feeling you aren't going to understand this post any more than you have any others.

Give my regards to that next windmill you tilt at, would you Don Quixote?  ;)

ETA:  And here comes puravida moving up on the outside.  Do I see 50%eggs joining in too?  C'mon, it's a party!!  Thanks again for the diversion :D

I am not sure,  maybe you should ask lisafx ;)

Squat

  • If you think you know, you know squat
« Reply #178 on: August 05, 2009, 12:59 »
0
Sorry, you missed my point.  I will try once more because I have some time to waste with you today. 

It isn't the "being offensive" I objected to in Lisa's post, or yours either.  Offensive is a relative term anyway. 

What I object to, is people pretending to be an authority on a subject they know nothing about. That goes for everyone and really has nothing to do with gender at all.

I am not offended by your tone.  I can take it or I wouldn't be here.  Same goes for Lisa4s, Stacey (who you keep alluding to), or anyone else on this forum.  While your attempts at chivalry are rather quaint, these women aren't/didn't ask for your help in defending them.

Gonna have to sign off now.  Got a life to live, and friends and family to spend it with.  Besides, I have a feeling you aren't going to understand this post any more than you have any others.

Give my regards to that next windmill you tilt at, would you Don Quixote?  ;)

ETA:  And here comes puravida moving up on the outside.  Do I see 50%eggs joining in too?  C'mon, it's a party!!  Thanks again for the diversion :D

Sure what ., we are the ones who don't have a life.

It's ironic. Everytime someone disagrees with you, and get their rearend lubed, they all come up with the ubitquitous empirical response, "get a life".
Come on, what, be a little more creative with your remarks.
After all, you are the one who is the expert and the one with the life...
 ;)
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 13:06 by 50%egg »

bittersweet

« Reply #179 on: August 05, 2009, 13:03 »
0
ARGH.

I think that you are missing PB's point, and that was that the original "attack" was on this person who came from nowhere to spout off a whole lot of nonsense about something she clearly knew very little about. SHE is NOT making money on microstock because she is not (yet) participating in microstock.

I don't think PB was trying to draw lines of differentiation between the levels of contributor here, only between those who actually have real experience and knowledge of microstock, and those who clearly do not.

puravida

  • diablo como vd
« Reply #180 on: August 05, 2009, 13:09 »
0
ARGH.

I think that you are missing PB's point, and that was that the original "attack" was on this person who came from nowhere to spout off a whole lot of nonsense about something she clearly knew very little about. SHE is NOT making money on microstock because she is not (yet) participating in microstock.

I don't think PB was trying to draw lines of differentiation between the levels of contributor here, only between those who actually have real experience and knowledge of microstock, and those who clearly do not.

granted whatalife, c'est cool !

but that still does not entitle gostwyck to be obnoxious. and PB to mouth off to mention Stacey with equal exuberance, a la gostwyck.

still, i accept the consequence. it is a forum, i can take as much as i give.
so , let's get used to it, like it or not.

i don't have a life, i am not successful , so this is my only life, why not?
the irony to all this? the ones who insist we get a life is spending as much time over here as we are.  ROFL...

look in the mirror ! what do you see ? same thing as you see in me .ROFL :D

 :D
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 13:14 by puravida »

bittersweet

« Reply #181 on: August 05, 2009, 13:21 »
0
Hell, at this point I'd just like to see one thread make it through a grown-up on-topic discussion without the mention of lubricant.

And they wonder why people won't take them or their opinions seriously.

bittersweet

« Reply #182 on: August 05, 2009, 13:26 »
0
I am not sure,  maybe you should ask lisafx ;)

Ask her what?

« Reply #183 on: August 05, 2009, 13:30 »
0
ARGH.

I think that you are missing PB's point, and that was that the original "attack" was on this person who came from nowhere to spout off a whole lot of nonsense about something she clearly knew very little about. SHE is NOT making money on microstock because she is not (yet) participating in microstock.

I don't think PB was trying to draw lines of differentiation between the levels of contributor here, only between those who actually have real experience and knowledge of microstock, and those who clearly do not.

whatalife, good to hear from someone else other than all of us aforementioned.

my point is also missed.  whether someone is active or inactive is moot.
we had oldhippy, OP, and many others who were disqualified simply because they are not with micro stock, or more directly, disagree with the culture of micro stock.
they came in here to "rant off" what they know squat.
so what?

is this not a forum? why can't they say what they want?
if it 's not a fact, or whatever, what's the big deal about letting them rant?
we can respond just as loudly to that.
but don't pick on anyone personally, to attack them .

we know by history, our good friend who is departed sadly , who was very verbose and loud
and nasty to many people here. but the big diff is that he was never personally obnoxious. he never attacked anyone directly AS A PERSON.
i can mention another very QUALIFIED AND SUCCESSFUL MICRO STOCK PERSONALITY here as well,
who has been just as loud and outspoken. He too have never attack anyone personally,
no matter how harsh his response.

that is the fine line that is not crossed. the fine line that crude old cranky gost crossed many times.

so PB finds it offensive to read about CRANKY OLD MAN WITH MALE MENOPAUSE.
well, PB can go to the disney site if she does not approve of it.
she could tell me the same, if i don 't approve of gost and his excessive estrogen antics.
but hey, i like to kick arse as much as the other person.
like it or not, i am here to stay. and if i read what offends me, i throw back an equally offensive remark. tit for tat. twit or *. male or female, it's all fair game.

someone before us laid the ground rules, we are merely playing by the same rules they play.



puravida

  • diablo como vd
« Reply #184 on: August 05, 2009, 13:34 »
0
Hell, at this point I'd just like to see one thread make it through a grown-up on-topic discussion without the mention of lubricant.

And they wonder why people won't take them or their opinions seriously.

and you take everything that gostwyck says seriously?  ???
lol c'mon bud whatalife, you got to be kidding me , right?  ;)


bittersweet

« Reply #185 on: August 05, 2009, 13:43 »
0
is this not a forum? why can't they say what they want?
if it 's not a fact, or whatever, what's the big deal about letting them rant?

Sure this is a forum, but this person came in and managed to badly derail at least 2 threads by copying and pasting her same lengthy rant in multiple places, whether or not it was on topic where it was pasted. I would think this is against the rules of this forum.

I don't even know how Gostwyk got brought up in this thread. (and I can't bear to read back through 8 pages, mostly nonsense, to figure it out) The majority of the personal attacks I'm seeing are not coming from Gostwyk, and they certainly don't have anything to do with the topic of this thread as intended by the original poster.

I guess I would think that those who value this forum would be opposed to threads falling into mayhem as seems to be the trend of late. Nothing wrong with reasoned debate, even emotional debate if it at least sounds a little bit sane. The longer the stuff that has been going on continues, the more "professionals" we will have coming here to tell us what amateurish ignorant imbeciles we are. ... and from the impression being given to the outside world, it seems like a logical conclusion.

bittersweet

« Reply #186 on: August 05, 2009, 13:44 »
0
Hell, at this point I'd just like to see one thread make it through a grown-up on-topic discussion without the mention of lubricant.

And they wonder why people won't take them or their opinions seriously.

and you take everything that gostwyck says seriously?  ???
lol c'mon bud whatalife, you got to be kidding me , right?  ;)

There has got to be some kind of serious disconnect for you to read what I wrote as some kind of endorsement of gostwyck.  ::)

« Reply #187 on: August 05, 2009, 13:50 »
0
Hell, at this point I'd just like to see one thread make it through a grown-up on-topic discussion without the mention of lubricant.

And they wonder why people won't take them or their opinions seriously.

and you take everything that gostwyck says seriously?  ???
lol c'mon bud whatalife, you got to be kidding me , right?  ;)

There has got to be some kind of serious disconnect for you to read what I wrote as some kind of endorsement of gostwyck.  ::)

no, you are right. objectivity has been alluded from gostwyck's regular antics.

but i have to admit, your objective intervention makes good sense, right after  i read the response to persius.



is this not a forum? why can't they say what they want?
if it 's not a fact, or whatever, what's the big deal about letting them rant?

Sure this is a forum, but this person came in and managed to badly derail at least 2 threads by copying and pasting her same lengthy rant in multiple places, whether or not it was on topic where it was pasted. I would think this is against the rules of this forum.

I don't even know how Gostwyk got brought up in this thread. (and I can't bear to read back through 8 pages, mostly nonsense, to figure it out) The majority of the personal attacks I'm seeing are not coming from Gostwyk, and they certainly don't have anything to do with the topic of this thread as intended by the original poster.

I guess I would think that those who value this forum would be opposed to threads falling into mayhem as seems to be the trend of late. Nothing wrong with reasoned debate, even emotional debate if it at least sounds a little bit sane. The longer the stuff that has been going on continues, the more "professionals" we will have coming here to tell us what amateurish ignorant imbeciles we are. ... and from the impression being given to the outside world, it seems like a logical conclusion.

ok, i too did not go back many pages to see that that person was not the OP of this post, and that she hijacked this thread.

good of you to intervene to point this out .

HerrMursilgo

  • achdulibertzeit eine Ratte mit Flgeln
« Reply #188 on: August 05, 2009, 14:20 »
0
So interesting I see  war now between lisafx - PixelBytes and  puravida -oblidihell.  The rulers hier are not friends no more. Disagrement to insultive fighting worts.
Helarious to me to eye . Hohoho!

puravida

  • diablo como vd
« Reply #189 on: August 05, 2009, 14:26 »
0
Ho ho up ya $, whatever whoever you are. New member, huh?
did you resurrect yourself from dracula's tomb or what?

better buy a thesarus ..while you're at it. E bay's got a good bargain. don't you ever get a spellchecker? ::)

I am finished "hier" , if you want to know  8)


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
5706 Views
Last post August 06, 2009, 03:58
by pixdeluxe
14 Replies
4613 Views
Last post April 20, 2018, 19:54
by Wishing well
15 Replies
3238 Views
Last post September 18, 2007, 15:26
by chellyar
9 Replies
4752 Views
Last post May 29, 2008, 08:06
by josh_crestock
3 Replies
3705 Views
Last post August 19, 2009, 14:25
by RacePhoto

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors