Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 05:36

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: The Sierra Club and Watermarked images.  

(Read 1582 times)
snaprender


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« on: April 22, 2009, 17:20 »

Happened across The Sierra Clubs website today and noticed both a watermarked picture from IStock and one from Fotosearch...Do big organizations like The Seirra Club really steal images or do you think they just don't know any better or possibly IS and Fotosearch just let them use watermarked images?  I am under the impression watermarked images are for comp usage only...what do you think?

http://rmc.sierraclub.org/rfg/index.shtml  (Its at the bottom of the page - the recycle symbol.  You can barely see it, but the IS watermark is there.)

http://rmc.sierraclub.org/rfg/Committee.htm   This ones pretty evident.



Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
madelaide
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2009, 18:49 »

I can't see it in the recycle sign!  Shocked

Indeed, they should know what they are doing, unless a teenager is doing their webdesign.


Ignore | Logged


stormchaser


« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2009, 19:09 »

There are many adults who haven't a clue either.


Ignore | Logged


snaprender


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2009, 19:12 »

I've got a 27" monitor, so maybe that's why I can see it so well..LOL.

Here's a better link - see if this helps.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.rmc.sierraclub.org/rfg/Images/ist2_581051_green_recycle_symbol.jpg&imgrefurl=http://rmc.sierraclub.org/rfg/index.shtml&h=380&w=380&sz=29&tbnid=75CQjsEDsdwOwM::&tbnh=123&tbnw=123&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drecycle&usg=__M0m5xHSA0z7CVydVpPP43yWeU3w=&ei=8bHvSdPwFaiEtAOKh-XhCg&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=7&ct=image

then click the 'see full size image' - you should be able to see the IS camera on the lower left of the sign.


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2009, 19:23 »

There are many adults who haven't a clue either.

My comment is that a teen might worry less about the consequences of using illegal material, even knowing this is not allowed. 


Ignore | Logged


batman


« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2009, 20:15 »

the problem is that word "royalty free".  i read a consumer magazine where they discuss about how you can download movies and music "legally" and "royalty free".
quote: while there's a widespread assumption that all that is pirated material, nothing can be further from the truth. (unquote).
 then it goes on to say how "certain sites distribute untold gigabytes of high quality ROYALTY FREE audio".

if you were an amateur, you would now assume anything ROYALTY FREE is legal for you to download to use.

mind you, this article is not written in a blog by "some careless teenager", but in a well known consumer magazine that features photography, tv, printers, lenses, studio lighting,etc. thus, this is some "media expert" who contributes to this magazine on a regular basis.

« Last Edit: April 22, 2009, 20:19 by batman »
Logged


madelaide
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2009, 21:11 »

batman,

I think the term "royalty free" is very misleading and to many people it translates simply as "free".

At Shutterpoint we can see how people got to our images, and often I see searches for "free subject photos", and Google et al send them to anything with "royalty free subject photos".

FT BR/PT/SP translated "royalty free" as "free of rights".  Undecided


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2009, 21:41 »

Indeed, they should know what they are doing, unless a teenager is doing their webdesign.

Might be.  It's just a local chapter page.


Ignore | Logged


Karimala



« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2009, 10:09 »

Indeed, they should know what they are doing, unless a teenager is doing their webdesign.

Might be.  It's just a local chapter page.

And local chapters tend to utilize volunteers to maintain their websites who might not know anything more than simple desktop publishing. 


Ignore | Logged


fotografer
« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2009, 10:18 »

Before I started selling my images I thought that Royalty Free meant that they were free.


Ignore | Logged


Fred


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2009, 11:34 »

Hard to believe they didn't know.  What did they think the prices were all about when they clicked on the image?  Why do they think it has that ugly watermark?

fred


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2009, 16:26 »

Some people don't mind.  I found a company in UK using a watermarked image of mine, I emailed them and they still have the image online.  It is from LO, so reporting to the site isn't a solution.  DT once said they would take care of such cases even if they were not stolen from them - I should ask them.


Ignore | Logged


snaprender


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2009, 17:36 »

Hard to believe they didn't know.  What did they think the prices were all about when they clicked on the image?  Why do they think it has that ugly watermark?

fred

Exactly.  The prices on the images make it quite clear that you have to purchase them.


Ignore | Logged


astrocady


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2009, 09:55 »

it could be they believe it is ok to use the photo without paying for it as long as they leave the watermark in place -- and that you only have to pay if you want a clean image.  This think is not without precedent.  There are may software programs available for free or reduced prices IF you leave the advertising in place, but for a small amount you can get a copy with no advertising.  This forum is another example -- don't like the ads, join as a premium member and they're gone.


Ignore | Logged


OM


« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2009, 18:30 »

Image is not particularly well protected, is it. At least they haven't tried to remove the watermark
!


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Watermarked images in many sites
General Stock Discussion
madelaide 9 1649 Last post October 11, 2008, 16:56
by RGebbiePhoto
Watermarked images got by the reviewers
Dreamstime.com
eppic 0 630 Last post May 26, 2009, 11:41
by eppic
Lots of Watermarked Images
Image Sleuth
garren 8 1368 Last post January 24, 2011, 07:16
by cclapper
60 watermarked images
Image Sleuth
ShadySue 9 1258 Last post March 30, 2011, 13:22
by Blufish
An experiment about watermarked images in use
Image Sleuth
madelaide 5 1005 Last post August 01, 2011, 16:19
by madelaide

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc