Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 05:38

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print

Topic: There are no rules: Microstock is totally harem scarem.  

(Read 4515 times)
stockastic


« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2010, 10:04 »

i shoot only studio shots of objects I already own or can get at no cost.

I think we're seeing this the same way.  I've had some success shooting unusual, old, and/or retro objects but soon ran out of subjects I already owned.  Just for the fun of it, I went to some surplus/scrap outlets, picked up a few things and did images of them. Sure, they sold, in some cases surprisingly well, but they also cost me a few bucks plus some amount of time. 

As you point out, the way this ends is with a few high-volume producers scratching out a slim margin on repetitious shots costing little or nothing to produce.   


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #26 on: November 01, 2010, 11:38 »

i shoot only studio shots of objects I already own or can get at no cost.

I think we're seeing this the same way.  I've had some success shooting unusual, old, and/or retro objects but soon ran out of subjects I already owned.  Just for the fun of it, I went to some surplus/scrap outlets, picked up a few things and did images of them. Sure, they sold, in some cases surprisingly well, but they also cost me a few bucks plus some amount of time. 

As you point out, the way this ends is with a few high-volume producers scratching out a slim margin on repetitious shots costing little or nothing to produce.   

Very close to my conclusions. The key will be, as you say,  the "little or nothing to produce" approach. Very high-volume commercially aware producers only. Those who think that microstock will somehow reward the edgy creative efforts are dead wrong. The costs in time and effort will overwhelm the returns. The only way I can see otherwise is for highly specialized content with much higher contributor commissions. Do I dare say macro or some morph of it?


Ignore | Logged


stockastic


« Reply #27 on: November 01, 2010, 13:15 »

Do I dare say macro or some morph of it?

Therein lies the crux of the matter.  Something new has to evolve.  Those of use producing viable 'niche' images currently seem to have no place in the microstock market, which means money is being left on the table.  

I'm not giving microstock any more images that cost me $15 to produce and return $10 after a year.

I don't need to get $500 for a sale, or $50.   At just $5 things would start to make sense.  I'd even find SS subscription sales acceptable at $1, but not 25 cents.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 15:59 by stockastic »

Ignore | Logged


RacePhoto



« Reply #28 on: November 01, 2010, 22:30 »

Do I dare say macro or some morph of it?

Therein lies the crux of the matter.  Something new has to evolve.  Those of use producing viable 'niche' images currently seem to have no place in the microstock market, which means money is being left on the table.  

I'm not giving microstock any more images that cost me $15 to produce and return $10 after a year.

I don't need to get $500 for a sale, or $50.   At just $5 things would start to make sense.  I'd even find SS subscription sales acceptable at $1, but not 25 cents.

HELLO! YES! EXACTLY!

I'd be very happy with micro at $1.00 a download, minimum. Instead they keep dropping the prices and commissions and we're getting tossed spare change like beggars on the street with a tin cup.
 


Ignore | Logged


jbarber873


« Reply #29 on: November 06, 2010, 23:08 »

i shoot only studio shots of objects I already own or can get at no cost.

I think we're seeing this the same way.  I've had some success shooting unusual, old, and/or retro objects but soon ran out of subjects I already owned.  Just for the fun of it, I went to some surplus/scrap outlets, picked up a few things and did images of them. Sure, they sold, in some cases surprisingly well, but they also cost me a few bucks plus some amount of time. 

As you point out, the way this ends is with a few high-volume producers scratching out a slim margin on repetitious shots costing little or nothing to produce.   

Very close to my conclusions. The key will be, as you say,  the "little or nothing to produce" approach. Very high-volume commercially aware producers only. Those who think that microstock will somehow reward the edgy creative efforts are dead wrong. The costs in time and effort will overwhelm the returns. The only way I can see otherwise is for highly specialized content with much higher contributor commissions. Do I dare say macro or some morph of it?

   I spent 20 years collecting props from shooting annual reports, so this is what i shoot now. I honestly don't see how it makes any sense otherwise. As an example, for the NYSE, i used to shoot a flag for each country they had a listing in. These flags cost $30 each, so I only shoot the ones I already have. I could never recover the $30 if I had to buy it now. If I could sell these through my macrostock agency, I'd get a much better price, but they won't take them because they aren't "edgy". So i'm just recycling old props. Then, after I finish shooting all this stuff, I'll sell it on ebay Grin


Ignore | Logged


louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #30 on: November 07, 2010, 10:35 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin


Ignore | Logged


donding



« Reply #31 on: November 07, 2010, 11:16 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

That's just about what it's boiled down to... Undecided


Ignore | Logged


cclapper
« Reply #32 on: November 07, 2010, 11:28 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

LOL! You are sure right on that. Last few posts make a lot of sense and mirror my thoughts exactly.


Ignore | Logged


jbarber873


« Reply #33 on: November 07, 2010, 11:32 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

LOL! You are sure right on that. Last few posts make a lot of sense and mirror my thoughts exactly.
  Yeah, but shooting my props gives me the illusion that I am busy. After I sell them on ebay, then all I have left is being a greeter at walmart Grin


Ignore | Logged


stockastic


« Reply #34 on: November 07, 2010, 11:45 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

LOL! You are sure right on that. Last few posts make a lot of sense and mirror my thoughts exactly.
 Yeah, but shooting my props gives me the illusion that I am busy. After I sell them on ebay, then all I have left is being a greeter at walmart Grin

But then you can do a series of "Big Box Retailer Greeter" shots.  Just be sure to remove all the logos.


In a vew years, all microstock will be produced in China, in a small city that does nothing but shoot stock. They'll photograph every object that's produced in a Chinese factory, i.e. everything that exists in the world.  Their children will be surgically altered at birth to become good-looking models of every ethnicity, and taught to smile radiantly.  An entire street of kitchens will produce every dish known to man, to be photographed and discarded.  The photographers will work 60 hour weeks for the eqivalent of $5. 
« Last Edit: November 07, 2010, 11:54 by stockastic »

Ignore | Logged


WarrenPrice

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #35 on: November 07, 2010, 11:52 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

LOL! You are sure right on that. Last few posts make a lot of sense and mirror my thoughts exactly.

Not me.  I eat my props after taking a picture.  Or, even more restrictive, they belong to my wife.   Roll Eyes


Ignore | Logged


donding



« Reply #36 on: November 07, 2010, 12:10 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

LOL! You are sure right on that. Last few posts make a lot of sense and mirror my thoughts exactly.
 Yeah, but shooting my props gives me the illusion that I am busy. After I sell them on ebay, then all I have left is being a greeter at walmart Grin

But then you can do a series of "Big Box Retailer Greeter" shots.  Just be sure to remove all the logos.


In a vew years, all microstock will be produced in China, in a small city that does nothing but shoot stock. They'll photograph every object that's produced in a Chinese factory, i.e. everything that exists in the world.  Their children will be surgically altered at birth to become good-looking models of every ethnicity, and taught to smile radiantly.  An entire street of kitchens will produce every dish known to man, to be photographed and discarded.  The photographers will work 60 hour weeks for the eqivalent of $5. 

LOL ain't that the truth....the use to be "Made in the USA" store Walmart is all "Made in China" now...... Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


jbarber873


« Reply #37 on: November 07, 2010, 12:11 »

Why even shoot? I'd probably make more money just selling my props on ebay than bothering to shoot them for microstock.  Grin

LOL! You are sure right on that. Last few posts make a lot of sense and mirror my thoughts exactly.
 Yeah, but shooting my props gives me the illusion that I am busy. After I sell them on ebay, then all I have left is being a greeter at walmart Grin

But then you can do a series of "Big Box Retailer Greeter" shots.  Just be sure to remove all the logos.


In a vew years, all microstock will be produced in China, in a small city that does nothing but shoot stock. They'll photograph every object that's produced in a Chinese factory, i.e. everything that exists in the world.  Their children will be surgically altered at birth to become good-looking models of every ethnicity, and taught to smile radiantly.  An entire street of kitchens will produce every dish known to man, to be photographed and discarded.  The photographers will work 60 hour weeks for the eqivalent of $5. 

This is so close to reality it's scary!  I shared a studio with a photographer that shot product shots of bedding and curtains for packaging, but then the chinese companies that took the work away from the US mills started throwing the product shots and packaging in for free. You can't compete with free.


Ignore | Logged


louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #38 on: November 07, 2010, 12:19 »

And what comes after selling my props on ebay?
In this order: camera bags, flash and studio lighting setups, tripods, shutter releases, light meter, white cards, Canon battery recharger, spare batteries, compact disk flash cards, closeup attachment, closeup filters, macro lenses, telephoto lenses, Photoshop plug-ins and third party programs, inkjet paper and canvases, extra 220 ml ink cartridges, Epson 9800 printer, 50 mm lens, CS5 suite, Eizo monitor, Apple deskpro computer and keyboard, complete micro-stock portfolio, and password to Microstockgroup.  This is sounding a lot like a plan.


Ignore | Logged


jbarber873


« Reply #39 on: November 07, 2010, 12:56 »

And what comes after selling my props on ebay?
In this order: camera bags, flash and studio lighting setups, tripods, shutter releases, light meter, white cards, Canon battery recharger, spare batteries, compact disk flash cards, closeup attachment, closeup filters, macro lenses, telephoto lenses, Photoshop plug-ins and third party programs, inkjet paper and canvases, extra 220 ml ink cartridges, Epson 9800 printer, 50 mm lens, CS5 suite, Eizo monitor, Apple deskpro computer and keyboard, complete micro-stock portfolio, and password to Microstockgroup.  This is sounding a lot like a plan.

dibs on the password Grin


Ignore | Logged


molka


« Reply #40 on: November 07, 2010, 13:55 »

I round up sime really nice gals, they get hq pictures of themselves for free if they sign MR, and I try to get laid. That way it's worth shooting for microcrap. If don't get laid at all, I stop, coz that is just unsustainable : ) Or maybe I should drop my DSLR, seems like it's becoming a loosers icon as I read here, and just pimp them, I dunno, we'll see. I was also thinking maybe it's easier to mug people disguised as photographer.


Ignore | Logged


Vonkara



« Reply #41 on: November 07, 2010, 14:03 »

Do I dare say macro or some morph of it?

Therein lies the crux of the matter.  Something new has to evolve.  Those of use producing viable 'niche' images currently seem to have no place in the microstock market, which means money is being left on the table.  

I'm not giving microstock any more images that cost me $15 to produce and return $10 after a year.

I don't need to get $500 for a sale, or $50.   At just $5 things would start to make sense.  I'd even find SS subscription sales acceptable at $1, but not 25 cents.

HELLO! YES! EXACTLY!

I'd be very happy with micro at $1.00 a download, minimum. Instead they keep dropping the prices and commissions and we're getting tossed spare change like beggars on the street with a tin cup.
 

Sadly, it look like many are happy as long as they sell something. In my opinion, not many report bad incomes, but they do report bad sales. I don't care if I get a low commission by being exclusive with Istock. I know I still get 76 cents for a XS and up to 14$ for a XXXL. 14$ that's 4 Fotolia extended licences.

To equal one full size sale, I would have to sell around 40 full size pics elsewhere at subs prices.


Ignore | Logged


Sign up with Shutterstock
molka


« Reply #42 on: November 07, 2010, 14:22 »

Do I dare say macro or some morph of it?

Therein lies the crux of the matter.  Something new has to evolve.  Those of use producing viable 'niche' images currently seem to have no place in the microstock market, which means money is being left on the table.  

I'm not giving microstock any more images that cost me $15 to produce and return $10 after a year.

I don't need to get $500 for a sale, or $50.   At just $5 things would start to make sense.  I'd even find SS subscription sales acceptable at $1, but not 25 cents.

HELLO! YES! EXACTLY!

I'd be very happy with micro at $1.00 a download, minimum. Instead they keep dropping the prices and commissions and we're getting tossed spare change like beggars on the street with a tin cup.
 

Sadly, it look like many are happy as long as they sell something. In my opinion, not many report bad incomes, but they do report bad sales. I don't care if I get a low commission by being exclusive with Istock. I know I still get 76 cents for a XS and up to 14$ for a XXXL. 14$ that's 4 Fotolia extended licences.

To equal one full size sale, I would have to sell around 40 full size pics elsewhere at subs prices.

what % of your sales XXXL makes nowadays?


Ignore | Logged


louoates


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #43 on: November 07, 2010, 14:27 »

I round up sime really nice gals, they get hq pictures of themselves for free if they sign MR, and I try to get laid. That way it's worth shooting for microcrap. If don't get laid at all, I stop, coz that is just unsustainable : ) Or maybe I should drop my DSLR, seems like it's becoming a loosers icon as I read here, and just pimp them, I dunno, we'll see. I was also thinking maybe it's easier to mug people disguised as photographer.

I second your last and excellent concept. My Glock fits nicely and unobtrusively into my tamrac camera bag.


Ignore | Logged


MarkFGD

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #44 on: November 07, 2010, 15:16 »

Molka, it's easier to get mugged when you're disguised as a photographer; it's easier to mug people when you're disguised as a stock photography agency. If you want to start mugging people yourself, you need to upgrade to a different class of shooter.


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Microstock Copyright Rules
General Stock Discussion
GeoPappas 10 2194 Last post July 17, 2006, 16:31
by madelaide
Totally crashing on Fotolia « 1 2 »
Fotolia.com
bbettina 32 4285 Last post April 05, 2007, 17:38
by madelaide
Totally Off Topic
Off Topic
dazedandconfused 13 1744 Last post October 23, 2008, 22:54
by helix7
Is search engine totally messed up now?
Shutterstock.com
melastmohican 3 1061 Last post May 13, 2009, 16:12
by melastmohican
Totally Looks like
Off Topic
madelaide 3 655 Last post July 26, 2009, 14:38
by madelaide

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc