Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 05:54

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Tracking year on year sales - Shutterstock vs. Dreamstime vs. iStock  

(Read 3318 times)
disorderly


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« on: August 18, 2009, 16:00 »

A question on the Micropayment Yahoo group got me thinking about agency performance in a different way.  The member reported a sharp drop in sales at Shutterstock and Dreamstime this year and wanted to know if others were seeing similar results.  To be a little scientific about it, I compared the past twelve month's sales to the previous period: September, 2008 - August, 2009 (extrapolated to a full month) vs. September, 2007 - August, 2008.  What I saw surprised me a little.

Here's the thing: Shutterstock did 62% better for me this past year than the year before.  Dreamstime did half that: 30% year over year.  But iStockphoto was the shocker: a grand total of 1% better this year than last.  All that time and energy uploading just to stay where I was.

Of course, part of the difference is that I'm able to grow my portfolios at Shutterstock and Dreamstime (and others) as fast as I can create new images.  On September 1, 2007 I had fewer than 1700 images at Shutterstock.  By 9/1/08 I was up to nearly 3000; now I'm over 6300.  (I submit the same images to Dreamstime.  Any difference in port size is down to DT's review process.)

By comparison, iStock's upload limits have held me back in a major way.  My iStock port was under 1000 on 9/1/07, just under 1600 on 9/1/08 and around 2300 today.  Given the way images age and the vagaries of search algorithms and other factors beyond my control, the best I can expect is to tread water there.  And I doubt somehow identifying my best and most salable images for upload would change that result all that much.

Which is all food for thought.  Measuring incremental effort against potential gain, looks like there's a lot more value in generating more content for Shutterstock and then feeding it to the others than there is from the two hours a week I spend uploading and disambiguating on iStock.


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
hoi ha


« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2009, 20:29 »

Thanks for the information - that is interesting indeed ... what about your RPI on the 3 different sites?


Ignore | Logged


disorderly


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2009, 20:34 »

I don't track RPI.  It's not a good measure of the kind of shooting I do now.  Instead of a handful of images from a single shoot, I may get up to a hundred to add to my port from a studio session.  Individually they don't sell all that well, but the aggregate does.  What that means is that my RPI has been falling, my revenue per shoot and my overall revenue continue to climb.


Ignore | Logged


Jonathan Ross

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2009, 22:00 »

Good info Disorderly,

 I like your handle as well. Yes I think "sell through rate" is a better gauge than RPI or per shoot sales when dealing with such large production. Great post full of valuable information. Thanks for sharing.

Best,
Jonathan


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Happy New Year to everyone!
Off Topic
scrappinstacy 5 1278 Last post January 01, 2007, 06:29
by chellyar
Deletion of 1-year-old images with no sales
iStockPhoto.com
madelaide 8 1855 Last post February 09, 2007, 22:11
by yingyang0
iStock announces how much contributors got paid last year « 1 2 »
iStockPhoto.com
maunger 30 8999 Last post April 03, 2008, 03:12
by Freezingpictures
Happy New Year
Off Topic
madelaide 22 2416 Last post January 01, 2009, 23:02
by oboy
Did anyone get a 1099 from Dreamstime this year?
Dreamstime.com
lisafx 2 849 Last post February 28, 2009, 19:05
by graficallyminded

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc