Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 08:59

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » Microstock Photography Forum - General » General Stock Discussion » Watermarked images in many sites

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: Watermarked images in many sites

(Read 1652 times)

madelaide

Premium Member

« on: October 06, 2008, 21:13 »

#link

I occasionally use Tineye to check if I find some images. Today I found the same image in FOUR sites, all with LuckyOliver's thumbnails.

I'll email these sites to see if admin takes proper action, but we are really a bit helpless with sites that disappear, aren't we?
http://media.photobucket.com/image/sun%20love%20cartoon/kalikee/LO-cartoon_sun_gradient_color-50758.jpg?o=1
http://screen-wipes.co.uk/index.php?main_page=page&id=45&chapter=0 (the same cartoon sun down the page)
http://www.squidoo.com/canon-g9-powershot
http://photos.ibibo.com/photos/viewphoto/579e8837ca6930024bbde2c7a995b52442-v1/102584

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

Vonkara

« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2008, 21:20 »

#link

The thing with tineye is that I only found the same size images than the preview I use on Istock for example. I always wonder if they don't just clone up the watermarks and use them on their sites

The lucky oliver watemarks don't do their jobs at all Shocked


« Last Edit: October 06, 2008, 21:23 by Vonkara »	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2008, 21:53 »

#link

Yes, LO watermarks were useless, and the guys using my images could have used them unwatermarked and I would have never known they had not purchased them. Angry

Two of those sites are photosharing, two are business sites using my images. I wrote to all of them.

The worst part is that I can't take any legal action against them, in case they maintain images online. Is there a microstock agencies union or such? Huh

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

zstoimenov

New Member

« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2008, 02:04 »

#link

Quote from: madelaide on October 06, 2008, 21:53

Is there a microstock agencies union or such? Huh

This is not a bad idea


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2008, 16:38 »

#link

It may sound insane as they are competitors, but I think none of them wants their business harmed.

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

Fred

« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2008, 03:55 »

#link

If these guys http://screen-wipes.co.uk/index.php?main_page=page&id=45&chapter=0 are thumbing their nose at Fox - using the Simpsons image. What chance have we got?

fred


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2008, 20:56 »

#link

Just an update, the two commercial websites are still showing the image. Photobucket removed the image and sent me an email (automated thing, it seems); Ibibo simply removed it.

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2008, 05:48 »

#link

Squidoo management replied that I should discuss this directly with the page owner (they're a type of blog site) and only if he doesn't reply, then they will "review the material and, if appropriate, lock the lens from view." (they call each page a "lens").

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

holgs

« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2008, 14:52 »

#link

Quote from: madelaide on October 09, 2008, 05:48

Their response sounds like they're opening themselves up to be sued by all manner of people. While hosts for blog style sites can't be responsible for all the content, when they are notified of a copyright violation, they can't just pass it off as not being their responsibility - if they just leave it there, they can effectively become responsible for breach in copyright and liable in damages.


	Ignore \| Logged

RGebbiePhoto

« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2008, 16:56 »

#link

Hmmm...
I think a well phrased email might take care of that...

"I noticed an image of mine on your website. I also noticed that it has a company watermark on it, which means it wasn't paid for. Squidoo has informed me that if you do not remove this image in a timely manner, the entire page that my image appears on will be locked and unviewable. Now, I don't want to lock your blog down, so if you would be so kind as to remove the image, I would be happy to contact Squidoo and tell them you are in compliance. Thank you very much!"

heh


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	The Sierra Club and Watermarked images. General Stock Discussion	snaprender	14	1582	April 25, 2009, 18:30 by OM
	Watermarked images got by the reviewers Dreamstime.com	eppic	0	630	May 26, 2009, 11:41 by eppic
	Lots of Watermarked Images Image Sleuth	garren	8	1370	January 24, 2011, 07:16 by cclapper
	60 watermarked images Image Sleuth	ShadySue	9	1258	March 30, 2011, 13:22 by Blufish
	An experiment about watermarked images in use Image Sleuth	madelaide	5	1007	August 01, 2011, 16:19 by madelaide

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.7
Fotolia	34.9
Dreamstime	26.7

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.6
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.2
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.7
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4.1
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.8
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
iRockStock
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex
Imagegate
ViscoImages

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-26

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]