Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 09:23

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: What micro sites accept editorial photos?  

(Read 1929 times)
oscarcwilliams


« on: July 17, 2008, 13:19 »

Please name the microstock sites that accept editorial images.   Example: Barack Obama


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
oboy


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2008, 14:16 »


Photoshelter
Alamy
Shutterstock
Dreamstime
Featurepics
Cutcaster
MostPhotos
YayMicro
Scandinavian Stock Photo
Zymmetrical


Ignore | Logged


oscarcwilliams


« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2008, 14:26 »

Thanks so much Oboy, you really saved my day.---Oscar


Ignore | Logged


litifeta



« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2008, 15:52 »

As far as I have seen Yaymicro is the only one that truly understands editorial images. Except nothing is selling there so far.

I look in the newspaper each day and see an example of outside a Boeing building, or outside a Virgin store.

Unfortunately, the majority of micro sites do not see these types of images as editorial stock. It seems DT only wants things that are related to a specific incident. Which is a waste of time.

If you wanted to submit them, you would not choose a micro site. There are specific news sites that pay thousands of dollars for images of specific events.


Ignore | Logged


epixx


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2008, 19:02 »

As far as I have seen Yaymicro is the only one that truly understands editorial images. Except nothing is selling there so far.

Alamy obviously understands editorial as well. It even dominates most of the portfolios there. FP and Scanstock will also accept most or any editorial photos in my experience


Ignore | Logged


Seren



« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2008, 02:10 »

Please name the microstock sites that accept editorial images.   Example: Barack Obama

Little quick lesson...

If you have a shot of a celebrity, it might sell a couple of times in it's lifetime before sinking to the bottom of the pile.  You could put it on Shutterstock, sell it ten times, and then it's gone because it's not relevant anymore.  Celebrity pictures generally aren't classics that keep selling.  They are relevant for news coverage of *that* event.  You've made $2.50.

If you put it with a traditional agency who do editorial, you could sell it several times for several hundred dollars before it again, goes down to the bottom of the pile.

Photographers who sell "news worthy" editorial shots on the micros are doing themselves a disservice.  Go with an editorial agency and get the most bang for your buck.  Make it worthwhile shooting this type of event.

BTW, did you know that OK magazine now pay less than 20% of what they used to several years ago for celeb pics?  You get £20 now if your images is published.  Obviously that's not for the feature spread, they're paid many, many thousands of pounds (got friends who have shot for them).

I'm all about targeting the right market with the right shots (otherwise I wouldn't have a portfolio on iStock).  But celeb shots etc should be part of your premium brand, not part of your budget brand.  IMHO.


Ignore | Logged


Jimi King


« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2008, 03:23 »

Has anybody tried Scoopt (www.scoopt.com)?

If so, did you get any sales?

I notice it's owned by Getty Images.


Ignore | Logged


epixx


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2008, 05:14 »

Photographers who sell "news worthy" editorial shots on the micros are doing themselves a disservice.  Go with an editorial agency and get the most bang for your buck.  Make it worthwhile shooting this type of event.


I agree. The only value of the "editorial" category at agencies like SS, is to be allowed to upload images that would have been rejected because of trade marks etc. The real valuable, but low volume ones should be sold as RM. Alamy is an obvious place to upload those, but there are other alternatives as well.


Ignore | Logged


HermanM


« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2008, 17:05 »

Editorial images at micros equals a waste of time...

Editorial images, by its nature, will get few downloads... Why accept peanuts for those few downloads when they can earn more (far far more) at traditional stock sites.  I just sold one at Alamy today, as editorial... At a microsite, even at a dollar a pop it would have required 80 downloads to just match the single earnings from one sale... And the image is so strange that I really don´t know if it will sell again... At a micro it would have earned one dollar, or less...


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Micro agencies that accept CD's?
General Stock Discussion
Seren 2 853 Last post February 20, 2008, 07:17
by Seren
EDITORIAL photos - List of sites that accept them?
General Stock Discussion
ann 6 1716 Last post April 12, 2008, 21:03
by ann
Which companies (besides Alamy) accept editorial?
General Stock Discussion
strikerx98 7 1441 Last post June 27, 2008, 15:40
by HermanM
Does Veer accept editorial photos?
Veer
cclapper 2 951 Last post August 01, 2009, 10:23
by cclapper
Which sites accept editorial?
General Stock Discussion
donding 9 1204 Last post August 18, 2010, 11:11
by donding

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc