Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 09:45

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Poll
Question: Which side woudl you refer a potential buyer to
shutterstock - 14 (15.9%)
fotolia - 5 (5.7%)
dreamstime - 19 (21.6%)
istock - 13 (14.8%)
stockxpert - 8 (9.1%)
bigstock - 3 (3.4%)
canstock - 2 (2.3%)
123RF - 4 (4.5%)
crestock - 0 (0%)
lucky oliver - 6 (6.8%)
other - 14 (15.9%)
Total Voters: 52

Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Which site to recommend to buyers  

(Read 1790 times)
leaf
« on: September 29, 2007, 18:52 »

If you had a friend who wanted to buy images for say a school project.  which site would you send them to buy the pictures at (not taking any referal income into consideration)

note:you can vote for up to 2 sites


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Kngkyle



« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2007, 19:03 »

Lucky Oliver and StockXpert.

Shutterstock for referral bonuses though.  Wink


Ignore | Logged


dbvirago



« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2007, 19:31 »

For A friend for a school project? whichever is cheapest on a per picture basis.

For any other single buyer - FP or LO for high commissions.

For general marketing, SS because most months, that's where the money is.


Ignore | Logged


moori


« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2007, 19:51 »

Featurepics or Mostphotos, because there I can set my own price.


Ignore | Logged


fotografer
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2007, 19:52 »

I answered  before reading it properly.  I thought it meant which would I send someone to, to buy one of my images so I answered DT as I make the most out of it on average. If I  was sending a friends to buy images I would send them to the cheapest site, probably FT.


Ignore | Logged


Kngkyle



« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2007, 20:02 »

Reasons why I wouldn't send him to certain sites:

Shutterstock - has to buy a full months subscription when he only needs a few photos.
Fotolia - loads slow, the search is weird, and there are a lot of poor quality images.
Dreamstime - no real reason, just prefer StockXpert and Lucky Oliver better.
Istockphoto - disaster of a website.
Bigstockphoto - unattractive website, lot of poor quality images.

and the reason why I picked LO and StockXpert:

StockXpert - high quality images, neat and easy website to use.
Lucky Oliver - the theme and set up is great. the images are decent quality.


Ignore | Logged


epixx


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2007, 22:12 »

Featurepics should have been on the list, and would have been my first choice. I have a big portfolio there, and the earnings per download are much higher.


Ignore | Logged


wysiwyg_foto


« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2007, 23:11 »

What kind of images are they looking for?  Do they already have models in mind?  Honestly, for a school project, if the models and the concepts and everything else is already lined up (so all I have to do is shoot), then I'd do it in exchange for a model release.  The good shots, I'd upload to traditional agencies.  The mediocre shots, I'd upload to microstock.  I'd exchange the images for property/model releases.

For images already in my portfolio, I'd negotiate on my own.  Why would I want to send them to competition if I could fulfill the need?

Last resort....doesn't matter in the end.  Either, I've already failed to market myself as a photographer or I'm already rolling in the money and don't need the business anyway.  Smiley

(sorry, I'm being cynical - I'm not in a position currently where I can turn business, or potential business opportunities away).


Ignore | Logged


sharpshot


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2007, 02:11 »

Featurepics is my first choice.  I can set any price and receive 70% commission.  I don't understand why we are not promoting them more.  Wont we all make more money if they do well?  I would like to see links to them all over the place.

Here's mine Smiley
http://www.featurepics.com/Authors/Images1041.aspx

StockXpert would be my second choice as I want them to take over from istock as the number 1 site.  They have 50% commission for non-exclusive images compared to just 20% with istock and the upload is very straightforward.  The site doesn't seem to have the problems I have experienced with istock.  The sales are good, considering they are one of the newer sites.


Ignore | Logged


Perrush



« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2007, 02:25 »

dreamstime for me.

1) they are the cheapest :
http://www.perrush.be/art_buy_stock_images_ZEN_02.html

2) they have a subscription plan

Selecondly IS  Angry -> still a very good search engine, a lot of good vectors and of course some exclusive content.  But the most expensive of the lot.


Ignore | Logged


Phil



« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2007, 08:03 »

if it was a friend for a school project, I'd just let them use it, I aint that greedy  Cheesy



Ignore | Logged


Peter



« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2007, 09:58 »

Fotolia

1. You do not have to subscribe with hunders of dollars, you buy credits that you need, for example 10 credits, for 10$, and you do not have to buy hunderds of images if you dont want.

2. I am selling there, so buy my images. hahahahaha


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2007, 12:30 »

Featurepics would be my first choice, because I get a better commission from my images and they also pay me for referrals.  In my website, everytime I use an image I have in FP, I put a link to it.

I picked StockXpert for my second choice, because prices and commissions are very reasonable.  But on a second thought I think I won't get any referral from them, would I?  If not, DT would be a second choice.

Regards,
Adelaide


Ignore | Logged


timurilenk


New Member


« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2007, 12:42 »

Feature Pics for me as well - good returns per image.


Ignore | Logged


owaisphotography


New Member

Dreamstime Gauge
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2011, 10:42 »

DT is best for buyers and Sellers because there customer service is not rude like IS and SS


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #15 on: December 07, 2011, 15:42 »

<< OLD THREAD ALERT >>


Ignore | Logged


cthoman



« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2011, 17:20 »

mystockvectors.com

Shameless plug inserted into an old thread!  Grin


Ignore | Logged


Sign up with Shutterstock
cclapper
« Reply #17 on: December 07, 2011, 17:49 »

Buy my photos! Following Cory's lead...shameless plug inserted into old thread.  Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #18 on: December 07, 2011, 20:10 »

Lucky Oliver and StockXpert.
Right  Grin


Ignore | Logged


cthoman



« Reply #19 on: December 07, 2011, 20:26 »

Buy my photos! Following Cory's lead...shameless plug inserted into old thread.  Cheesy

I try to look through the individual artist sites that I have bookmarked when I need photos (yours included). Unfortunately, I don't buy images very often. I'd like to compile a larger list at some point. It's a pet project on the back burner now though.


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Recommend a magazine?
Off Topic
Bateleur 7 1420 Last post October 23, 2008, 17:27
by le_cyclope
The stock site you recommend to buyers « 1 2 »
General Stock Discussion
helix7 42 3481 Last post February 12, 2010, 18:48
by madelaide
Do you think buyers loyalty lie with just one site? « 1 2 »
General Stock Discussion
donding 34 2706 Last post March 10, 2010, 16:22
by madelaide
Would You Recommend Microstock To Someone As Their Sole Source of Income? « 1 2 3 »
General Stock Discussion
Ed 60 3208 Last post October 09, 2011, 13:46
by cthoman
Cannot Recommend Dreamstime « 1 2 »
Dreamstime.com
juscommune 39 3021 Last post November 14, 2011, 23:04
by helix7

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc