Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 11:05

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Worst of the worst selectors  

(Read 1008 times)
CD123



« on: September 15, 2011, 13:34 »

Not considering stupid rejection reasons, what in your experience is the site which constantly pick all the pictures no one else wants and rejects the top sellers on other sites.  Simply put thus, the worst of image selectors.

In my case Crestock must get the gold medal for always picking the opposite choice of every one else and has (for me) the sales record to confirm their awkward taste.

(You might have had those "not what we are looking for" type of feedback and then thought, sorry, my bad, thought you wanted something that sells..... Cheesy)
« Last Edit: September 15, 2011, 13:37 by CD123 »

Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Snufkin


« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2011, 13:53 »

I have never submitted to Crestock because of their bad reputation.

For me the worst reviewers are definetely at 123RF, although when I started in 2008 they were quite good.
Depending on the batch I have about 85-100% acceptance at SS and DT, but 123RF would reject everything but the weakest photos from the batch. I don't contribute there actively anymore, doesn't make sense.
I suspect they switched to some sort of automated reviewing process in 2009. People shooting models still report good acceptance rates. I don't have rejection problems anywhere else.


Ignore | Logged


Koufax73

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2011, 14:48 »

Crestock is also my number one. Never seen another site as arrogant to reject 200+ photos in a matter of minutes.


Ignore | Logged


alexmk


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2011, 18:48 »

For me DT is the worst worst of image selectors  because of their stupid policy "Too many photos/illustrations on the same subject or from the same series."
I don't submit to low earners sites except GL so I don't know their review process.
Who has the best reviewers? iStock! They really know their job.

Like it or not they are still  number one!
 


Ignore | Logged


icefront


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2011, 16:36 »

Gold medal goes to Crestock. After changes at Crestock, regardless what I submitted, only 10% were accepted. Totally inappropriate rejection reasons.
Silver medal goes to Veer. Several really selling images were rejected something as 'does not appealing to Veer customers'
Bronze goes to DT. The editors will found everything similar that isn't. They over-complicate this similar thing. They simply remain without more images and choices for buyers.


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Your worst performer? « 1 2 »
General Stock Discussion
Daneel 31 3374 Last post March 16, 2007, 20:14
by madelaide
The Best of the Worst
New Sites - General
Kngkyle 18 3468 Last post November 03, 2007, 03:08
by leaf
My best and worst day
General Stock Discussion
melastmohican 1 718 Last post April 21, 2008, 23:31
by rjmiz
Worst pics of the day
Crestock.com
PedroV 11 2244 Last post September 09, 2009, 01:00
by Randy McKown
3 Top & 3 Worst Months?
General Stock Discussion
CD123 7 810 Last post March 16, 2011, 00:56
by CD123

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc