MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => iStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: pet_chia on October 12, 2010, 15:35
-
I noticed the account balance dropped by a couple of dollars or so, then I saw that I had an email. Evidently a customer asked for a refund on a file they decided not to use. No problem with that, but I am surprised that anyone would go to the effort of sending in a "signed and witnessed Certificate of Destruction" for a $20 refund. My impression has been that the cost of microstock is a tiny fraction of the other costs of graphic art design (such as the artists' time). Things must be getting pretty tough out there :P
-
Why in the world would they give them a refund because they decided not to use it? That doesn't make sense. They would already have the photo and they can't very well return it.
-
Evidently, to get their $20 back they provided a signed statement swearing on the beard of Zeus that they deleted the file. Talk about counting pennies.
-
I have had this happen on several occasions.
It's annoying because there is really no way to prove that they have destroyed the file
-
I'm just surprised they would give them a refund. It's not like they are bringing back a pair of blue jeans for a refund. A digital image can't really be returned and you have to rely on the word of the buyer...even though they sworn the deleted the file. iStock must be really kissing a** of the buyers.
-
They would already have the photo and they can't very well return it.
It's not really about the photo though. What they are buying is a licence to use it. If they decide not to then it makes sense they should get a refund. That just good customer relations.
I think we all like to deal with companies which trust us as customers :)
-
They would already have the photo and they can't very well return it.
It's not really about the photo though. What they are buying is a licence to use it. If they decide not to then it makes sense they should get a refund. That just good customer relations.
I think we all like to deal with companies which trust us as customers :)
Yes I guess you have a good point there. There's just so much thievery out there, I guess you have to learn to trust them.
-
They would already have the photo and they can't very well return it.
It's not really about the photo though. What they are buying is a licence to use it. If they decide not to then it makes sense they should get a refund. That just good customer relations.
I think we all like to deal with companies which trust us as customers :)
right. It does suck when you get these. I've had several, though none recently.
it is a good customer service and iStock has been offering this for a long time. it's not something they just added because of all the negative stuff going on right now.
-
It sounds ok if this is not a pattern for that buyer.
-
I thought that getting something signed and witnessed for a refund of $20 was baloney, then again it might have been one of many photos picked out for a big job that got canceled. This is the first time it happened to me.
-
I got one of those refund emails from iStock. Buyer decided he needed an Extended License. He was refunded for his standard license and bought an Extended one so I came out about $30 ahead!
No complaints here.
c h e e r s
fred