MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Photography Discussion => Topic started by: FD on December 21, 2009, 11:31

Title: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: FD on December 21, 2009, 11:31
Give the reviewers some work. A 26 Gigapix panorama of Dresden (http://www.dresden-26-gigapixels.com/dresden26GP), currently the largest photo in the world.
Quote
The picture was made with the Canon 5D mark II and a 400mm-lens. It consists of 1.665 full format pictures with 21.4 megapixel, which was recorded by a photo-robot in 172 minutes. The converting of 102 GB raw data by a computer with a main memory cache of 48 GB and 16 processors took 94 hours. With a resolution of 297.500 x 87.500 pixel (26 gigapixel) the picture is the largest in the world. (stand December 2009)
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: vonkara on December 21, 2009, 14:06
This resolve the problem to find some worthy subject. Now you juste have to crop your panoramas. Nice find !
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: Kngkyle on December 21, 2009, 15:27
Insane.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: leaf on December 21, 2009, 15:54
that is crazy zooming in and out.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: MicrostockExp on December 21, 2009, 17:36
Amazing:) a bit smaller but still a 18Gpx photo, in Prague this time:
http://www.360cities.net/prague-18-gigapixels (http://www.360cities.net/prague-18-gigapixels)
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: vonkara on December 21, 2009, 17:55
Now that one is nice. Make me want to go in the olympic stadium tower here in Montreal and take a couple of snapshots. Maybe all worthless because of the windows but anyway.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: eppic on December 21, 2009, 20:14
Here's your ticket to making images like that:

http://www.gigapansystems.com/ (http://www.gigapansystems.com/)

While 26 giga-pixels might be a bit much, you can still make some pretty skookum images with this baby.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: FD on December 21, 2009, 23:04
Stitched panoramas do well, I noticed. The software also got much better. Did anybody try the stitching package that came with the 5D-MKII?
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: leaf on December 22, 2009, 02:17
Stitched panoramas do well, I noticed. The software also got much better. Did anybody try the stitching package that came with the 5D-MKII?

what?  there are stitching packages with the 5D MKII

I have stitched around 6 photos together for microstock panos, just using photoshop, and it works very well.  Submitting those to the micros though, they have to be downsized a lot.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: Read_My_Rights on December 22, 2009, 17:06
Still unacceptable for microstock. Sensor spots in the sky. Rejected :(
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: FD on December 23, 2009, 03:08
what?  there are stitching packages with the 5D MKII
I think I made a mistake, sorry.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: photoBeard on January 31, 2010, 13:40
Now I really want to upgrade for a 5D to a 5D II !!!!!  And of course I want their computer to go with that..............
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: WarrenPrice on January 31, 2010, 14:16
Now I really want to upgrade for a 5D to a 5D II !!!!!  And of course I want their computer to go with that..............

Me too.  Computing power is what holds me back from venturing into video.   :(
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: bendicks on January 31, 2010, 16:01

Here is my attempt at a multi-image horizontal/vertical build....

Loon Lake Panorama View, located in El Dorado county, California, This shot consists of 36 different images stitched together to form a single image that was 51,444 pixels wide by 8,532 pixels tall. I reduced this image by 50% so that it is 25,944 pixels in width (did'nt have enough memory to convert the full sized image).This was then diced up into 1500 separate images to produce the zooming/panning abilities without downloading a massive image across the internet.

The scroll wheel works to zoom and you can grab the image to slide it around when zoomed in.

http://sierramc.com/zoomloon/ (http://sierramc.com/zoomloon/)

-Don
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: Randy McKown on January 31, 2010, 18:59
3 hours of robot shooting + 94 hours stitching together 1,665 photos = 1 really big snapshot ..... potential copyrights, bad composition, limited commercial value, total waste of time LMAO !!!!!!
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: No Longer Cares on February 01, 2010, 09:33
I use CS4 now to stitch my panos, but I use to use a great tool called ArcSoft Panorama Maker.  I had version 4 and it did great.  It’s very easy to use for beginners also.

Now that I use Lightroom, CS4 is easy also.  I just select all the images I want to put together and right click.  there is a "Send to CS4 ..." option that makes it easy.
Title: Re: Artifacts at full view? Try a 26 GPx photo.
Post by: FD on February 01, 2010, 10:17
[url]http://sierramc.com/zoomloon/[/url] ([url]http://sierramc.com/zoomloon/[/url])
Fantastic! (there is a Wall-mart shopping bag at the extreme right  ;))