MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Lighting 101  (Read 4581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tab62

« on: March 23, 2011, 12:52 »
0
Hi Stock Folks,

On this particular photo it was rejected do to the following reasons-

Poor lighting setup, poor contrast or incorrect exposure

I am new to the photo world thus not sure what is might by the rejection in full detail? I had the exposure to 100 ISO and thought the lighting was good. Guess not.

Thanks.

Tom


« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2011, 13:08 »
0
you need to bring more light into the set.. it is dark dark despite a few blinks.. buy some strobes and you will see what I am talking about.. you can always place your set near a window and try to capture some of that light :)

tab62

« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2011, 13:15 »
0
The sad thing is that I had the lights and didn't use them- my fault. Lighting is an art by itself and I've got a lot to learn...

« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2011, 13:26 »
0
As mentioned in the other thread, why are you sticking slimy, uncooked fish with clean vegetables?  What's the message here?

red

« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2011, 14:25 »
0
Check your monitor too. Are you seeing something different on your monitor as compared with the images on the websites? All of your images appear to be on the dark side. What colorspace are you working in? Do some measuring of your white and black values. Are you post processing your images on a decent monitor?

tab62

« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2011, 15:49 »
0
yeah, the composition is weak with the fresh veggies and uncooked fish. My monitor is a cheap Princeton $175 that I got from cosco a few years back. Any recommendations on monitors?

« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2011, 16:32 »
0
The Dell u2210 is a great deal, or if you can afford it then the u2211.
if you have deeper pockets then we work with th u2410 which is a great monitor (saving up for the u3011)

« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2011, 18:15 »
0
I am looking at this image on an iMac 27"; I bet it does not look any better on my monitor than on yours.  An expensive monitor is not going to light this shot; only light will do that.  Look under all the vegs. and fish, there are dark areas, look at the fish, it looks dead (granted it is dead but the lighting sucks-)

Do you have a sliding glass door in your house; that is a big light source, use it with some reflector cards to study what the light does to the subject?  If the sun is shining directly in, put a white bed sheet over the door, instant diffusion.

There are various ways to light food, this is not one of them.  Some use a near over diffused head light with a rear quarter kicker, reflector and mirrors; other do 45 degree main and fill, etc.

When choosing items to put together in a set, choose items that go together.  I can not think of one dish that uses these vegs. and raw slimy fish (just thinking of it makes me want to puke).  Now, vegs, meat and totilla wraps go together; fish, knife and cutting board go together; fish and a cat licking the fish go together (smile); you get the idea.

BTW, not trying to be harsh, I just hate raw fish-it stinks, it is ugly, it is slimy, etc.  So take my words with grain of salt.

tab62

« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2011, 22:53 »
0
LOL on the fish part. Yeah, I had to wash my hands several times on this shot! I don't like touching them too much- I much rather touched cooked fish for sure! 


Here are my lights that I use in my very small studio- should these be good enough for most shots of did I get the wrong equipment? The two soft boxes have 5 bulbs in each one at 5500k and the spot light has one bulb at 6000k (75 watt).




Thanks.

Tom

« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2011, 01:21 »
0
Looks like some nice equipment; now you just need to cut the lights in the room and really look at your subject under different light.  BTW, softboxes are great but sometimes you may need more raw light, more directional, etc.

The difference between 5500K and 6000K is enough to cause a white balance mismatch, better to have all the same color temp.

tab62

« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2011, 08:58 »
0
Good point on the different temps of the lights. My intent it to blast the background to really make it White. In the past I used to use the 'Curves & Mask' feature in CS5 and chose the White Dropper which really makes the White background turn white but it also hit the objects especially if they have any white on them.

sc

« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2011, 11:37 »
0

tab62

« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2011, 14:28 »
0
Great tutorials! I used the 'Dodge' tool on some of my photos and thought I did a great job. Than one of the stock editors sent me an email telling me not to use the dodge tool and basically learn how to take a good photo with proper lighting.  Now I wonder how many of you folks use this technique? Maybe I screwed up by touching the subject slighting?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
Looking for Lighting Advice

Started by WarrenPrice Lighting

11 Replies
5845 Views
Last post November 12, 2011, 12:15
by WarrenPrice
19 Replies
6516 Views
Last post September 06, 2012, 20:18
by OM
6 Replies
5343 Views
Last post January 14, 2013, 08:19
by Mantis
4 Replies
4287 Views
Last post October 08, 2013, 03:25
by Beppe Grillo
10 Replies
4986 Views
Last post June 28, 2016, 11:09
by Benozaur

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors