MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Just removed all photos from 123rf  (Read 12214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mr

« on: April 26, 2015, 14:20 »
+9
And I feel better. Uploading was just a waste of time.  >:(


No Free Lunch

« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2015, 14:36 »
+4
Sorry to hear the bad news or results. Not sure what type of images you uploaded to them?  I do almost all still life from within my studio.

They are my 4th best company out of the 22 that I submit images.  About 6% of my overall income so they are worth uploading for me.

« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2015, 14:57 »
0
.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2015, 02:58 by Ariene »

« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2015, 16:21 »
+2
Why didn't you leave them there to earn the odd $. It would be a lot of work loading them back up if the site improved?


« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2015, 20:01 »
+5
For me, 123RF is top tier.  Doing better than FT these days.  They're #3 on my list.  Very happy with them.  Maybe it's just a matter of having content that clicks with their customers.

« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2015, 21:52 »
+4
123rf is not a big earner for me but uploading is very easy and painless, so I'll keep it up. Every little bit counts.

« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2015, 00:01 »
+3
If you stop uploading others win, you lose. Either way agencies always win. Sorry it works that way.

Semmick Photo

« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2015, 01:59 »
+10
I like 123 good customer support decent sales uploading is quick and easy high acceptance rate

« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2015, 02:19 »
+2
And I feel better. Uploading was just a waste of time.  >:(

removed all photos from 123rf? probably that's why I'm getting increased sales these days  ;)

« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2015, 02:41 »
0
their upload- and submitting system is one of the easiest around. They even decide whether an image will be editorial or not.
And sales are increasing here  :)

« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2015, 03:39 »
0
I like 123 good customer support decent sales uploading is quick and easy high acceptance rate

Yeh me too though their software seems a bit flaky at times - long processing times and periods where sales data goes AWOL but one of the better sites in my opinion.

Semmick Photo

« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2015, 03:50 »
+1
I agree, but so far, their support always fixes things. And credit to them, they will work with you to find solutions. Just one example, they had rejected my St Louis Arch images for commercial RF and added them as Editorial. I didnt agree with that decision and they offered me to sign a waiver to take all responsibility if ever anything legal came up regarding those images.  I didnt take the offer, but it shows they are willing to help where they can and divert from their agency policy. Very reasonable people IMO.

« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2015, 04:31 »
-3
MR,
I hope that you have a lot of friends. I hope that they will deactivate their 123 accounts as well.
And not just 123 account, other agencies, almost all, are horrible, agree?
Yess, time to deactivation, jipiiii.

« Reply #13 on: April 27, 2015, 17:19 »
+4
123RF is performing fine for me. Relatively speaking of course.
You should only remove your portfolio if you feel the agency is treating you unfairly, otherwise, you should leave them online. Someday sales might pick up, and if not, there's no time wasted removing them.

No Free Lunch

« Reply #14 on: April 27, 2015, 19:10 »
+1
MR,
I hope that you have a lot of friends. I hope that they will deactivate their 123 accounts as well.
And not just 123 account, other agencies, almost all, are horrible, agree?
Yess, time to deactivation, jipiiii.

that includes you shutting down all your accounts as well  ;)


« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2015, 23:44 »
+3
MR,
I hope that you have a lot of friends. I hope that they will deactivate their 123 accounts as well.
And not just 123 account, other agencies, almost all, are horrible, agree?
Yess, time to deactivation, jipiiii.

that includes you shutting down all your accounts as well  ;)

Ha,ha,
here we have another example, when people giving Not agree (or minus),
because they did not see a joke or a small sarcasm in reply.
Is it really so hard ?

And now I must go and deactivate another one or two accounts ;) ;)

« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2015, 13:41 »
0
123 is a bright spot in my earnings.  They are holding steady for more than a year while I see declines on big sites like Istock and shutterstock.

« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2015, 13:58 »
-2
Deleting your portfolio because uploading it was a waste of time seems like a self-fulfilling whinge to me. 

« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2015, 14:11 »
+3
Sometimes when I plant seeds in my garden... if they don't sprout within a week, I dig them up and burn them... said no one ever. 


« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2015, 22:45 »
0
For stills maybe is working but uploading video is a pain, no more than 2gb per file an 10gb daily limit, does anyone know if model relases csv mapping also works for videos ?

PZF

« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2015, 01:57 »
0
their upload- and submitting system is one of the easiest around. They even decide whether an image will be editorial or not.
And sales are increasing here  :)

I think you mean
it WAS.....!

« Reply #21 on: May 18, 2015, 07:53 »
+2
I stopped uploading everywhere but SS and FT. Trying to get every possible peny is not for me, and I do micro full time. Even if I make 10-20% less, I'm much happier this way. And it gives me time to create content for the agencies that really sell. I would also include IS if they ever get rid of that upload system.

« Reply #22 on: May 20, 2015, 18:13 »
+1
I stopped uploading everywhere but SS and FT. Trying to get every possible peny is not for me, and I do micro full time. Even if I make 10-20% less, I'm much happier this way. And it gives me time to create content for the agencies that really sell. I would also include IS if they ever get rid of that upload system.

for me 123 as video seller will do $$ /month, enough to cover my dog`s biscuits  :o

« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2015, 12:10 »
+5
Why didn't you leave them there to earn the odd $. It would be a lot of work loading them back up if the site improved?

I have also stopped uploading.  Even though uploading is easy, the revenue is too low to make it worth the trouble.  I haven't removed all of my photos, but I have deleted some selectively.  123RF pays me 25 cents per sub download, which is the lowest around.  I get 38 cents on Shutterstock.  To the extent that I have some photos that are reasonably unique, I am competing against myself, as presumably some buyers use more than one site.  It makes sense to delete them from the site where I get paid the least.

« Reply #24 on: June 12, 2015, 15:04 »
+1
I can see the thinking but don't know if many people have subs on more than one site - if it was me think i'd have a subs account on  one maybe  two sites and if I couldn't find what I wanted "top up" with credit sales


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
4145 Views
Last post August 08, 2008, 21:32
by mitzrah
32 Replies
20737 Views
Last post June 10, 2010, 08:57
by WarrenPrice
31 Replies
21757 Views
Last post June 19, 2011, 21:43
by Angel
8 Replies
4324 Views
Last post January 17, 2014, 05:23
by StockPhoto
8 Replies
3696 Views
Last post December 14, 2014, 12:23
by Microstock Posts

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors