MicrostockGroup

wow lori, great minds think alike. that's the image i was referring to. wow, been like doggone years that i saw it. thx for putting it here.

I second this advice. A common misconception seems to be that if you upload something similar to what's on the best seller list, you're sure to get through. At iStock, it's exactly the opposite. They have plenty of that stuff, so you need to show them you have the potential to add something of value to the collection that they do not already have oodles of. Impress them with your drawing skills, unique perspective, and/or interesting subject matter, in addition to adherence to their strict technical standards, and you will get accepted.

Then, and only then, can you begin to upload those dime a dozen hot sellers, if you are so inclined.

Good luck!!

good point Noodles.  whatalife too .
and then after you submit your unique idea, others copy you and then eventually your ideas become
one of those that create the rejection notice, "sorry, we already of too many of this". 

it's a viscious circle isn't it?

I did sent them links to my portfolios on all other agencies where they may choose what they need in over 700 vectors - but they are strict in accepting Getty collections without review and refusing other authors due to they think this or that ;-)

I doubt that I will do it under their rules and their standards due to that my portfolio would be crippled badly on iStock under that rules... And if it is so crippled, for me there is no point in selling images for under $10 single download... So, I would opt-out from subscriptions too... Subscriptions are meant for volume sales from volume image base where authors have volume to offer... In this case they offer just a part of my volume and that is wrong policy in my eyes.

Nevertheless, I have over 85% acceptance rate combined vector and photo submissions on ALL OTHER agencies including DT, SS, StockXpert, 123RF, BigStock, FP...
I have 100% ratio on Fotosearch from time when I was uploading via Unlistedimages Inc and they've streamed my portfolio in full to CanStockPhoto which also was accepted 100%...

So I have got the same threatmant from Fotosearch as iStock threats Getty images collections. What further to say?

I find it quite unfair that besides I have plenty of original artworks iStock doesn't need them ;-)

So more they are strict in their wrong policing, I am more determined to let them do it without my presence there. It is simple because of that there is quality, quanitity and many original works in my vectors.

As I saw it is quite not understood what I wrote. They automatically accepted Getty's Hulton archives as CanStockPhoto automatically accepted my images from Unlisted Images Inc. for Fotosearch.

So they are not the way you said!

It is that they have MASTER (Getty) who can override their decisions... And they continue to police authors with something what can't stand as policy anymore... Just wait and you'll see!

Did you saw any of my vectors used? You probably did but wasn't aware it was mine ;-)

So, there is issue. They look at me as I am some newbie who doesn't know what is stock illustration as well as the one who doesn't know how to draw.
I have education in arts where I've learned to draw, model and so on. So, before I started to draw vectors I already had some expirience and education in arts and how to draw or model anything on any material used for artistic expression using only hands and real artistic tools. I can model clay also or make bronze statue and so on ;-)
So, point here is that they reject me with 'we don't need' reasons with not even taking care about what I showed to them or even peeking in my portfolios which they saw I am sure! I am kind of insulted with stance of that reviewers who 'don't need' someone who knows how to draw and that to be executed chosen style in advance... My works completion time is from 5 minutes and up to 5 hours on computer. At least it is much faster than painting in oil where one layer must be waited to get dry for even 6 months! Photo realism vector is something I do for days but it is not microstock ;-)

And they still don't need my vectors?

LOL!

Original on micro? Come on dude - You must be quite OUT OF FOCUS if you think you will find original concepts on microstock. There are much more copiers than you even can imagine... All are copying others - it is just nature of business...

If we talk about copiers, Yuri has much to say about them due he is most copied author I know about. There are Andersr and others too whos works are used as inspiration for others.

BTW, Only about 10% of my images are inspired by works of other authors and NOT ANY of them can be called as infringement or copy!

IF iStock is looking for originality why then some their authors copy-cat my own original concepts? I dont mind that - that is natural to do due to some people like others people ideas! And, fortunately idea or concept in visual arts can't be Copyrighted!

BTW, iStock is full of obvious examples of copies and copiers as every other place!

Were you talking about this?

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=905003&highlight=dandelion#905003

At least I admited that I used other mans idea as inspiration... And a bit more reading along in that thread you will find someone "copies" my original image - or should I say, I found an fan of my work ;-)

And, have you some more arguments to acuse me on copying someone?

You can use link I gave in my previous message with my version of image of dandelions I was inspired with. Also, click just on camera near my nickname and voila - there is almost all what is online on all significant agencies!

Really Noodles?

1 image acceped in 6 tries with 'we don't need' is your clarification of their policy? No, they are just having someone there who thinks that he knows hes/her job and keeps his/her nose very high - that is all... It is subjective problem I have with my application as illustrator on iStock and also I don't follow the rules other people keeping their noses up-high are making. Also, I know there are at least hundreds of real copy-cat authors on iStock and their images really don't sell well... I can give them complete lists of relly close copies of other peoples works... Some of them are using old classical images for their 'original' images. Market knows who is copier and who is making some concepts look even better than originals... That is the point!

YES IT IS OK TO COPY OTHER CONCEPTS! If isn't so there would be only one stock agency selling stock images. That is concept too. Also there would be only one camera manufacturer due to camera manufacturing is concept too. And there would be only one Car manufacturer due car manufacturing is concept too ;-)

So, how many authors on iStock are submitting buttons or icons... They all copy concept from each other. How many authors there have lightbulbs? How many images of dandelion are there? How many of anythig is there anyway?
Can you find more than 100 people there who really have original artworks and styles?

All images over white are also concept copies.
Food images are concept copies too. As well as all images that can be categorized under some category... That all images are concept and are copies by your own understanding.
Celebrity candids (popular editorials) are also copies of concept.

So you don't like COMPETITION? You'd more like to have one smiley image for all than hundreds of them?
Come on dude, grow up,  GET FOCUSED at once and go learn something useful!

Don't forget FACTS: I have finished art school, I am quite productive and I have photographic memory. So, I am able to draw anything with just once seeing it and with any known artistic style in execution! You say I am superior compared to you - Well, it may be so!

There are hundreds of companies worldwide for which I've made logos or complete visual business identities... Agencies will work with me despite your imaginative theory about originality opposing to market values in variety of concepts.

But, why . am I loosing time here at all with trying to explain that milk is white to someone who says that milk is black and don't hear what I am telling?

It is because you have problem with your focus dude and I just tried to explain it to you! But, as it seems you'll need to ask for profesional help about it!

[EDIT] If they've rejecting me because of something called copy-cat they could easilly state that... But, I always sent them original works based on my own ideas - not any copy-cat work because that is what to do from time when you are in as all others!

LOL you got them ha?

See this two:





It appears to me that exclusive from iStock  has 'copied' my images at first ;-)

About that boats... It is old image used for conceptual versions... It is just simplified Van Gogh style, but Who cares?

But it isn't copy... You may look a bit through iStock forum and find thread about what is conceptual copy and difference between copy-cat and pure copy. Yes they are conceptual versions... But, not copies.

BTW, I am now working on that way to make copy-cats of my own artworks ;-) So, if I am You, I'd probably sue myself for 'breaking morality standards'. And I'd take some sedative before looking in milinz's portfolio due to these series will get ALOT more images in just few days...

LOL!

P.S. Thanks for free advertising of my conceptual vectors ;-)

Milinz chill! Too much information...just try and give iStock what they are asking for. They aren't going to be too interested in your education.

Yup - you're right!

I should shut up and look how some noodles takes his freedom to acuse me on copying copies of my own images.... Very interesting point is to stay calm on that kind of provocations!

LOL!

See this users at shutterstock:

1. CLICK_HERE

2. CLICK_HERE_AND_SEE_MORE

I thought it will be nice fun to look as stress management for noodles....