0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
^^^ What exactly is that supposed to be? It's not going to sell unless it jumps out of a page of thumbnails as a good representation of it's subject matter __ and I can't tell what it is even at that size.
Back on the subject of frustration with iStockphoto:QuoteWe regret to inform you that we cannot accept your submission, entitled squares mosaic pattern...... for addition to the iStockphoto library for the following reasons: We're sorry, but we did not find this file suitable as stock. With the rapid growth of the iStock collection, we give valuable consideration to each file but unfortunately cannot accept all submissions.So, I've sent it to scout and it is more than obvious that this IS VERY SUITABLE STOCK IMAGE with other version downloaded more than 300 times on other places. Nevertheless, this one has 50mpix resolution!Well, iStock will probably be my EX agency and 4th bailout due to this stupidity!
We regret to inform you that we cannot accept your submission, entitled squares mosaic pattern...... for addition to the iStockphoto library for the following reasons: We're sorry, but we did not find this file suitable as stock. With the rapid growth of the iStock collection, we give valuable consideration to each file but unfortunately cannot accept all submissions.
You guys really should give the agencies a bit of credit for knowing what they are doing, if every asset is accepted on every site and the search returned the same assets, where would be the diversity and what would be the point?
Quote from: Adeptris on June 17, 2009, 03:42You guys really should give the agencies a bit of credit for knowing what they are doing, if every asset is accepted on every site and the search returned the same assets, where would be the diversity and what would be the point?Should accept fewer. Some people upload far too many similar shots from their shoots. It was better in the days of film when only the best few got picked out for copying and distribution.
Quote from: Milinz on June 10, 2009, 04:40It's so shorts-sighted of iStock to reject an image like this. The copyspace is very salable
Quote from: FlemishDreams on June 10, 2009, 04:57Quote from: Milinz on June 10, 2009, 04:40It's so shorts-sighted of iStock to reject an image like this. The copyspace is very salable Milinz, can you not understand that iStock standards are generally higher - aesthetically speaking this illustration is quite poor.
...which is very useful to many designers.