Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 09:27

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: expiration date on model release?  

(Read 1696 times)
sunset517

New Member


« on: November 16, 2009, 10:51 »

I have a crazy idea... why not add an expiration statement to your model releases such as:

 "This authorization EXPIRES twelve months from the date it is signed and specifically authorizes the release of any content created before and after the date signed up until the expiration date."

I used to work for a copy service contracted by many different hospitals. In order to release medical records, you have to sign an authorization to do so. It remains valid for the time indicated on the release. That way, the patient doesn't have to come in and sign a release form every time they are admitted to the hospital. Their doctors can use the authorization they have on file to request copies of the records. Maybe something like this could apply to model releases.

I think I'm going to try it. What do you think?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
PixelBitch



« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2009, 10:59 »

I think this approach would leave it too open, I wouldn't sign that if I were a model...it's only considerate, and legally better, to have a model sign a release each shoot day...it only takes a couple of minutes and is better protection for all concerned.


I have a crazy idea... why not add an expiration statement to your model releases such as:

 "This authorization EXPIRES twelve months from the date it is signed and specifically authorizes the release of any content created before and after the date signed up until the expiration date."

I used to work for a copy service contracted by many different hospitals. In order to release medical records, you have to sign an authorization to do so. It remains valid for the time indicated on the release. That way, the patient doesn't have to come in and sign a release form every time they are admitted to the hospital. Their doctors can use the authorization they have on file to request copies of the records. Maybe something like this could apply to model releases.

I think I'm going to try it. What do you think?


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2009, 11:17 »

Not sure I understand the point. 

I often upload images from a shoot over 12 mos. from the date it was shot.  By making the release expire doesn't that just limit my options? 


Ignore | Logged


sunset517

New Member


« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2009, 13:32 »

I wouldn't put this on every model release. This idea is more for those people who shoot the same model over and over. For example, I shoot my son and daughter all the time. It is a PITA to keep printing out model releases and making sure the dates match up. I apologize for not explaining myself clearly.


Ignore | Logged


disorderly


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2009, 14:18 »

The problem is that your wording doesn't necessarily mean what you want it to mean.  Legalese should only be written by those who understand contract law, as words have specific meaning in legal documents that may be at variance with common use.  That said, I have a pro photographer friend who uses an annual release with many of the models he shoots.  The release covers all shoots within a specified range of dates, and saves him the trouble of doing paperwork again and again.  What the micros, particularly iStock, would think of such a release is something only they could answer.


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2009, 14:22 »

I wouldn't put this on every model release. This idea is more for those people who shoot the same model over and over. For example, I shoot my son and daughter all the time. It is a PITA to keep printing out model releases and making sure the dates match up. I apologize for not explaining myself clearly.

Ah.  I totally misunderstood.  This would be convenient.  I shoot my husband and daughter all the time. 


Ignore | Logged


dnavarrojr


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2009, 21:37 »

Print the model release with EVERYTHING filled in, except for the signatures.  Then photoshop in new dates using the same font.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2009, 21:51 »

Print the model release with EVERYTHING filled in, except for the signatures.  Then photoshop in new dates using the same font.

Technically speaking, that's forgery IMHO. In case of litigation, only the paper form counts.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2009, 22:06 »

This would be convenient.  I shoot my husband and daughter all the time.


In that case, it's very simple. Fill in all info (photog, model, witness, locations) in the form, just leaving date and signature spaces blank. As photog, you can even pre-sign all printed forms. After every shoot day, just let model and witness sign and fill in date, then shoot the release form and save it in the folder of the shoot's pictures. No mix-up possible then when uploading to iStock, especially if the date is part of the file name (as the Canon D5 does automatically).

For those that don't have a cam that names the files with the date+sequence number (e.g. DSCxxxx), there is a very nifty free program Advanced Renamer that can do all this and even autosequence the files.


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2009, 10:16 »


In that case, it's very simple. Fill in all info (photog, model, witness, locations) in the form, just leaving date and signature spaces blank. As photog, you can even pre-sign all printed forms. After every shoot day, just let model and witness sign and fill in date, then shoot the release form and save it in the folder of the shoot's pictures. No mix-up possible then when uploading to iStock, especially if the date is part of the file name (as the Canon D5 does automatically).


Really excellent suggestion!  ^^  Thanks Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2009, 10:34 »

Really excellent suggestion!  ^^  Thanks Cheesy

In case you missed a previous post: DOC (changeable MS-Word) version of the generalized Getty release (with more room for signature): download here.


Ignore | Logged


jsnover
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2009, 10:40 »

I wouldn't put this on every model release. This idea is more for those people who shoot the same model over and over. For example, I shoot my son and daughter all the time. It is a PITA to keep printing out model releases and making sure the dates match up. I apologize for not explaining myself clearly.
This may work for some of the micros but it won't for IS. Their new rules will allow a maximum of a week for the duration of a single shoot covered by one release, and that only if it's a single "event".

If you have models you shoot over and over, Photoshop's layer comps are great for printing out forms pre-filled in with the right info ready for signatures.


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2009, 17:57 »

In case you missed a previous post: DOC (changeable MS-Word) version of the generalized Getty release (with more room for signature): download here.


No, I hadn't seen that.  Very, very useful. Thanks a lot FD! Cheesy


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
model release form - stupidest release request?
Off Topic
fintastique 1 2215 Last post June 23, 2006, 04:27
by leaf
Model Release
General Stock Discussion
Pixart 10 2261 Last post October 13, 2006, 11:11
by leaf
New model release with every photo of the same model?
Shutterstock.com
mtbcyclist 3 2931 Last post October 12, 2006, 08:01
by mtbcyclist
Their model release
123RF
LanaLanglois 9 2150 Last post November 25, 2006, 10:02
by berryspun
Help. What Model Release do you use?
General Stock Discussion
Alatriste 5 1034 Last post June 18, 2008, 10:50
by ebola

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc