Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 09:28

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print

Topic: Extrapolating Redeemed Credits  

(Read 2973 times)
Phil



« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2010, 02:12 »

Hi,

for the past 3 years sept & oct have been about 10% higher than average, november average and december down about 20%, basically making those four months about the same as previous 4. Overall istock would sell more, my guess is those with a lot christmas stuff sell absolute heaps and basically would skew the view of everyone selling a lot more (could be wrong here though).


Ignore | Logged


sharply_done


iStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2010, 03:46 »

Here's a rough estimate: If I divide my redeemed credits by my royalties so far this year it works out to 1 redeemed credit = $0.53. I'm at diamond level, so you'll have to adjust this if you're not at that level. Here's a handy dandy chart:

Level   Commission   Redeemed Credit Value
Base           20%                    $0.27
Bronze        25%                    $0.33
Silver          30%                    $0.40
Gold           35%                    $0.46
Diamond     40%                    $0.53

So if you're at silver level and you earn $200 in a month, that works out to $200/0.40 = 500 redeemed credits.


Ignore | Logged


michealo


« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2010, 04:00 »

Here's a rough estimate: If I divide my redeemed credits by my royalties so far this year it works out to 1 redeemed credit = $0.53. I'm at diamond level, so you'll have to adjust this if you're not at that level. Here's a handy dandy chart:

Level   Commission   Redeemed Credit Value
Base           20%                    $0.27
Bronze        25%                    $0.33
Silver          30%                    $0.40
Gold           35%                    $0.46
Diamond     40%                    $0.53

So if you're at silver level and you earn $200 in a month, that works out to $200/0.40 = 500 redeemed credits.

That is spot on


Ignore | Logged


sharply_done


iStock Gauge
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2010, 05:23 »

I'll take it one step further.
If we know the value of a redeemed credit at each level, you can work out the royalties needed in order to maintain your commission level. You can calculate what royalties you'll need to jump up a level, too. Here's another handy dandy chart:

Level          Commission   Redeemed    Royalties Needed    Royalties Needed
                                       Credits Req'd      to Maintain              to Promote

IndyBase                15%               -                       -                               $398
IndyBronze             16%           2,000                 $424                         $2,650
IndySilver               17%         12,500               $2,816                         $9,010
IndyGold                18%         40,000               $9,540                       $35,775
IndyDiamond          19%       150,000              $37,763                     $352,450
IndyBlackDiamond  20%     1,400,000            $371,000                             -

Bronze                   25%           2,000                    -                              $4,141
Silver                     30%         12,500                $4,969                       $15,900   
Gold                      35%         40,000              $18,550                        $69,563
Diamond                40%       150,000              $79,500                      $742,000         
Black Diamond        45%    1,400,000            $834,750                              -


So if you're currently at Gold level, you'll need to earn $18,550 per year to maintain that commission rate - if you earn $69,553 you'll jump up to Diamond level. If you're an independent and iStock comprises 40% of your total microstock revenue, then you'll have to be earning about $94k to "earn" a 19% commission, and about 928k to get 20%.


Ignore | Logged


rubyroo



« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2010, 05:55 »

Although I'll be withdrawing from iStock when the new percentages kick in, I just wanted to say how much I appreciate you sharing your work on this Sharply... it's incredibly helpful to see the new levels expressed in these real terms.  I more clearly understand the difficulties for those non-exclusives stuck at 19% now.


Ignore | Logged


brm1949


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2010, 06:51 »

I'm an IndySilver so it looks like I'm done. This really sucks. Nothing for me to strive for anymore with istock.


Ignore | Logged


alias


« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2010, 06:55 »

If I divide my redeemed credits by my royalties so far this year it works out to 1 redeemed credit = $0.53.

Did you account for EL bonus, referrals ?

Logged


PixelsAway


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2010, 07:24 »

My estimation is $0.26/credit as IndyGold (including just 3 or 4 ELs this year)


Ignore | Logged


jamirae
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2010, 18:44 »

that's  a good chart. the only problem is that it does not account for those, like me, who have multiple mediums at iStock.  currently I am gold, but my port is both vector and photos so I will drop into different categories for that. 


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2010, 19:12 »

Interesting charts.  And very helpful.  Thanks for posting those.

Comparing Indy diamond to EX diamond, it looks like if a hypothetical independent makes $37, 863 then at the same level they would make $79,500 as exclusive.  Am I reading that right?  

If so, that would mean they would only make 211% of their independent Istock income if they were to go exclusive, assuming their sales levels stayed the same.  So double their income, plus 11%.  

As an independent diamond who makes 40% of my income from Istock, double that plus 11% still leaves me 9% short of my total income as an independent.  

Am I doing this right?   I was under the impression that under the current royalty scheme I would make significantly more as an exclusive.  Is that a myth, or have I somehow miscalculated?


Ignore | Logged


qwerty


« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2010, 19:23 »

Interesting charts.  And very helpful.  Thanks for posting those.

Comparing Indy diamond to EX diamond, it looks like if a hypothetical independent makes $37, 863 then at the same level they would make $79,500 as exclusive.  Am I reading that right?  

If so, that would mean they would only make 211% of their independent Istock income if they were to go exclusive, assuming their sales levels stayed the same.  So double their income, plus 11%.  

As an independent diamond who makes 40% of my income from Istock, double that plus 11% still leaves me 9% short of my total income as an independent.  

Am I doing this right?   I was under the impression that under the current royalty scheme I would make significantly more as an exclusive.  Is that a myth, or have I somehow miscalculated?

You also need to include access to Veta and increased upload quota and able to spend more time concentrating on shooting and improving Istock portfolio. These are all hard to quantify which makes the decision for exclusive harder. With Istock's recent behaviour I'd be surprised if many people are considering going exclusive.


Ignore | Logged


le_cyclope
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2010, 21:10 »

 

As an independent diamond who makes 40% of my income from Istock, double that plus 11% still leaves me 9% short of my total income as an independent.  

Am I doing this right?   I was under the impression that under the current royalty scheme I would make significantly more as an exclusive.  Is that a myth, or have I somehow miscalculated?

I think you forgot that as an excusive, your photos are going to be sold at higher price, and this can go from 20 to 100% more.  So this means more redeemed credits par sale and more $.

Or maybe it is me who is missing something???

Please correct me if i'm wrong because these higher prices are what makes exclusivity "still" interresting to me...

Claude


Ignore | Logged


holgs


iStock Gauge
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2010, 21:16 »

Interesting charts.  And very helpful.  Thanks for posting those.

Comparing Indy diamond to EX diamond, it looks like if a hypothetical independent makes $37, 863 then at the same level they would make $79,500 as exclusive.  Am I reading that right?  

If so, that would mean they would only make 211% of their independent Istock income if they were to go exclusive, assuming their sales levels stayed the same.  So double their income, plus 11%.  

As an independent diamond who makes 40% of my income from Istock, double that plus 11% still leaves me 9% short of my total income as an independent.  

Am I doing this right?   I was under the impression that under the current royalty scheme I would make significantly more as an exclusive.  Is that a myth, or have I somehow miscalculated?


You need to calculate the additional income from higher file prices - ie. each download you get is a higher percentage of a higher number of credits.

So on the new system it should be easier for exclusive to reach the higher levels in terms of the number of downloads.

With no other changes in your portfolio (ie. no vetta and no content in exclusive +) the number in this thread are reasonably accurate as a minimum. http://www.microstockgroup.com/istockphoto-com/evaluating-exclusivity-at-istock-crunching-the-numbers/


Ignore | Logged


cthoman



« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2010, 21:56 »

that's  a good chart. the only problem is that it does not account for those, like me, who have multiple mediums at iStock.  currently I am gold, but my port is both vector and photos so I will drop into different categories for that. 

Yeah, I hear you. The chart would be a lot more interesting if it applied to me at all (vectors).  Grin Although when I looked at my numbers, I could double my income there and still not make the next level which would still be a 10% cut. But, it's not about the money, right? Actually, I'm starting to agree with that statement. I wouldn't be considering deleting my portfolio if it was just about money.


Ignore | Logged


aeonf

iStock Gauge
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2010, 04:36 »

lisafx: a few more factors you forgot and where not mentioned here:

1. As an exc your files are much more expensive. more expensive photos = less demand = less downloads.
2. as an exc you get better best match = more sales.

which of the 2 out weighs the other is unknown.


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2010, 09:13 »

I didn't forget that exclusive files are more expensive.   I am using the data supplied by Sharply Done, which presumably already accounts for the price differential (or else his chart would be pretty useless).  

As for higher upload limits and "more time to shoot for Istock" that would be completely useless to me.  Most of my time is spent editing, not uploading, and that would not change with exclusivity.  I am already shooting and uploading at my maximum capacity, and my 40/week limit pretty much covers that.  

The only factor not considered is Vetta, and that's iffy, especially considering that royalties there are being cut.

So from what I can see I would still not benefit from exclusivity, even under the current conditions.  This is a genuine surprise to me.  I had thought I would.


Ignore | Logged


holgs


iStock Gauge
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2010, 09:52 »

I didn't forget that exclusive files are more expensive.   I am using the data supplied by Sharply Done, which presumably already accounts for the price differential (or else his chart would be pretty useless).  

As for higher upload limits and "more time to shoot for Istock" that would be completely useless to me.  Most of my time is spent editing, not uploading, and that would not change with exclusivity.  I am already shooting and uploading at my maximum capacity, and my 40/week limit pretty much covers that.  

The only factor not considered is Vetta, and that's iffy, especially considering that royalties there are being cut.

So from what I can see I would still not benefit from exclusivity, even under the current conditions.  This is a genuine surprise to me.  I had thought I would.

I wasn't suggesting that you were forgetting the higher prices, just that you couldn't use these stats to extrapolate your potential earnings as an exclusive.

The way the targets are set it would be relatively easier for exclusives to reach than independents precisely for the reason that they're accumulating credits faster on the same download numbers. 

The other factor is that the figures are fairly rough because credit prices vary depending on how credits are purchased. If you have a lot of sales from bloggers buying small credit packages (for example) your redeemed credit value would be higher because the credits cost more - but it would also mean that you need to earn more to reach the levels.

Another big variable that we don't know is whether the calculation of the redeemed credits is properly in sync with the annual download statistics.


Ignore | Logged


gostwyck

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2010, 10:28 »

It occurs to me that someone like Holgs, having only recently gone exclusive, could be quite seriously disadvantaged by being paid next year according to his RC's for this year, most of which he was independent for.

Looks like if anyone is barmy enough to go exclusive in the future at Istockphoto then they need to time it correctly or it could be very expensive in lost commissions.


Ignore | Logged


Freedom


« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2010, 11:45 »

That's a very good point. It has no advantage to go exclusive at the end of the year.

For Lisa, it will be too risky to go exclusive because she has built large ports with all agencies. Not only just the micros, she has to delete all her RF files from Alamy or perhaps other macros, not sure if there are many.

It occurs to me that someone like Holgs, having only recently gone exclusive, could be quite seriously disadvantaged by being paid next year according to his RC's for this year, most of which he was independent for.

Looks like if anyone is barmy enough to go exclusive in the future at Istockphoto then they need to time it correctly or it could be very expensive in lost commissions.


Ignore | Logged


holgs


iStock Gauge
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2010, 15:01 »

It occurs to me that someone like Holgs, having only recently gone exclusive, could be quite seriously disadvantaged by being paid next year according to his RC's for this year, most of which he was independent for.

Looks like if anyone is barmy enough to go exclusive in the future at Istockphoto then they need to time it correctly or it could be very expensive in lost commissions.

I think it will be the long-term Diamond exclusives that are hit hardest. I'm past the 30% level, but short of a massive upswing there's no chance I'll retain 35% for the start of next year.


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Redeemed Credit counter
iStockPhoto.com
ichiro17 0 350 Last post December 27, 2010, 09:38
by ichiro17
Trending Redeemed Credits. How are you doing? « 1 2 3 »
iStockPhoto.com
gostwyck 56 3620 Last post November 29, 2011, 16:57
by ShadySue
Redeemed Credits
General Stock Discussion
WarrenPrice 11 792 Last post June 08, 2011, 00:41
by microstockphoto.co.uk
Redeemed Credits from a business angle..... « 1 2 3 »
iStockPhoto.com
Shank_ali 65 2988 Last post July 18, 2011, 12:17
by luissantos84
REDEEMED CREDIT SYSTEM BROKEN « 1 2 ... 6 7 »
iStockPhoto.com
BaldricksTrousers 159 6933 Last post November 23, 2011, 17:25
by cobalt

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc