Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 10, 2012, 09:36

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print

Topic: Hot Shot Joke?  

(Read 8474 times)
Dook


« Reply #50 on: July 09, 2010, 06:47 »

iStock seams to be iStock anyhow.
I just waiting moment when Idiotic Lady Gaga lenses must be wannabee in iStock's vetta coljection.
Eh with they slow down rew process maybe they loose trendy crapty images like that  Grin
I think they have very very basic problems how to maintance basic site...
Coljection? Huh
Is it from verb klati or what?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Dreamframer



« Reply #51 on: July 09, 2010, 08:00 »

iStock seams to be iStock anyhow.
I just waiting moment when Idiotic Lady Gaga lenses must be wannabee in iStock's vetta coljection.
Eh with they slow down rew process maybe they loose trendy crapty images like that  Grin
I think they have very very basic problems how to maintance basic site...
Coljection? Huh
Is it from verb klati or what?

lololol


Ignore | Logged


Dook


« Reply #52 on: July 09, 2010, 12:32 »

I'm joking, of course. I love Suljo's humor a lot.


Ignore | Logged


Red Dove



« Reply #53 on: August 17, 2010, 13:47 »

If you got the mail today my "joke" image is the hand with the number 13 lottery ticket - which I confess, was never submitted to any micro agencies because I didn't think it would make it ie technically okay but low commercial value.

I've been a slacker with Getty and only have a handful on there but this encourages me to give it more of a go....although this image hasn't sold yet.....

I know some have said they are doing nicely out of this collaboration with Flickr - would be interesting to hear any updates on recent experiences.


Ignore | Logged


click_click


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #54 on: August 17, 2010, 14:10 »

If you got the mail today my "joke" image is the hand with the number 13 lottery ticket - which I confess, was never submitted to any micro agencies because I didn't think it would make it ie technically okay but low commercial value.

I've been a slacker with Getty and only have a handful on there but this encourages me to give it more of a go....although this image hasn't sold yet.....

I know some have said they are doing nicely out of this collaboration with Flickr - would be interesting to hear any updates on recent experiences.

I wouldn't consider that image as a joke. There is a clear concept evident so no harsh judgment there.

I originally started this thread with images that I had a problem finding the conceptual approach.


Ignore | Logged


Red Dove



« Reply #55 on: August 17, 2010, 14:19 »

If you got the mail today my "joke" image is the hand with the number 13 lottery ticket - which I confess, was never submitted to any micro agencies because I didn't think it would make it ie technically okay but low commercial value.

I've been a slacker with Getty and only have a handful on there but this encourages me to give it more of a go....although this image hasn't sold yet.....

I know some have said they are doing nicely out of this collaboration with Flickr - would be interesting to hear any updates on recent experiences.

I wouldn't consider that image as a joke. There is a clear concept evident so no harsh judgment there.

I originally started this thread with images that I had a problem finding the conceptual approach.

I don't consider it a joke either - but some might Wink

I see what you're saying about some of the work on there (and agree with you) but you could apply that to any agency I guess.


Ignore | Logged


click_click


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #56 on: August 17, 2010, 14:36 »

...
I don't consider it a joke either - but some might Wink

I see what you're saying about some of the work on there (and agree with you) but you could apply that to any agency I guess.

Well I have to admit that I'm not subscribing to any updates with other traditional agencies other than the "Hot Shots" from IS/Getty. However, it is a bit confusing to see so many "hand picked" shots from the Flickr collection while Getty itself has millions of images in their pool to pick from.

Previous Flickr "Hot Shots" had a bit of an "amateurish" touch that made me wonder about the Getty brand. Obviously Getty has reached (or surpassed) the point where it matters what content they have. Now it matters to have as much content as possible to squeeze out every penny of any image they can get their hands on.

Now the professional photographers are competing with people who (happen to take photos) didn't even plan on making money with them. It's like, why paying a plumbing company to fix my broken toilet if my neighbor who owns a wrench can also do it (for the same price)Huh


Ignore | Logged


Chadlatta

New Member


« Reply #57 on: September 02, 2011, 22:56 »

Quote
Now the professional photographers are competing with people who (happen to take photos) didn't even plan on making money with them. It's like, why paying a plumbing company to fix my broken toilet if my neighbor who owns a wrench can also do it (for the same price)Huh

What does it matter if a plumbing company or your neighbors fixes your pipe? The end result is that same?

Sorry for resurrecting such an old thread, but I happen to be one of the "hotshot" photographers you are all mocking. My photo is the dog with the wig.

I put a lot of thought and effort into that shot, and the many that followed. That image has made a fairly large sum of money for me. It has been on multiple book covers, used in various ad campaigns and sold as a large print for charity.

Was I or am I a professional photographer? No. Not everyone starts out as a professional. But it really doesn't matter. I, like everyone else, has the right to shoot how and what they want and do whatever they choose with those images.

I don't really know what I am trying to say here other than I have become more and more disheartened by the photography community lately. There is no support, there is only trash talking and "leave it to the pros" attitudes.

If Getty is not your thing, great....but does it really do any good to trash talk other peoples work, or is it just a way to make yourself feel better in an ever changing industry where the size of your lens or being a "pro" no longer matter.

Anyway....I just had to vent.


Ignore | Logged


bhr


iStock Gauge
« Reply #58 on: September 03, 2011, 03:36 »

^ great post

Who cares whether a photographer likes to call themselves a professional? Many of the world's greatest images were shot by, so called, gentlemen amateurs (but not only men) - and until recently 'professional' was something of a dirty word anyhow.

The past 25 years or so has been all about the snapshot. I very much like the Getty flickr collection.


Ignore | Logged


Art portfolio websites - FoundmyselfMicrostock Insider
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Joke sites
General Stock Discussion
melastmohican 6 1242 Last post May 08, 2008, 16:08
by a.k.a.-tom
joke of the day (one for the girls)
Off Topic
Phil 0 695 Last post September 15, 2009, 22:36
by Phil
joke of the day 17/9
Off Topic
Phil 10 1340 Last post September 18, 2009, 00:30
by Noodles
joke of the day 19/9
Off Topic
Phil 2 515 Last post September 19, 2009, 09:16
by elvinstar
joke of the 20/9
Off Topic
Phil 8 1675 Last post September 20, 2009, 16:17
by leaf

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc