Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 10:10

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » Top Tier - Big 4 » iStockPhoto.com » istock exlusivity increases sales?

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: istock exlusivity increases sales?

(Read 1498 times)

yuliang11

« on: May 28, 2009, 22:37 »

#link

hi,
For those has gone exclusive , i'm interested to know if your sales goes up on IS if u go exclusive? thanks


	Ignore \| Logged

michealo

« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2009, 04:13 »

#link

No, we go exclusive becasuse we are making too much money and we want to give up the revenue on other sites to make it easy for other photographers to make a living


	Ignore \| Logged

pixdeluxe

« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2009, 04:19 »

#link

Yes, amongst other factors, exclusivity definitely helps your sales.


	Ignore \| Logged

sharpshot

« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2009, 04:32 »

#link

I have read lots of posts from people that have gone exclusive and overall it does look like sales increase. That makes sense because files are reviewed quicker and can get a better placement in the best match search. I am sure there are buyers that prefer using exclusive artists, if they can find what they want. What puts me off going exclusive is that I have also read lots of posts from exclusives that have seen a big reduction in sales when the best match search has been changed. I have seen some say their sales have fallen below the level before they went exclusive.

As I rely on my income from microstock sites at the moment, I couldn't take these big swings. Perhaps one day when sales from RM have improved I might reconsider but for now going exclusive doesn't appeal to me.


	Ignore \| Logged

crazychristina

« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2009, 05:12 »

#link

What I'm looking forward to when I go exclusive is the larger upload allowance. This should allow me to grow my portfolio more quickly, encourage me to shoot more and hopefully improve more quickly, and also to experiment with other media (vectors, 3D) so that I should find what suits me best. Quite apart from any other factors, these ones should lead to more sales.


	Ignore \| Logged

MichaelJay

« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2009, 06:07 »

#link

I wouldn't base my decision on the question if exclusive images get better placement in searches or not. This has been discussed but only the involved admins actually knows and it might change over time.

You can certainly expect the royalty change. The higher upload limits could be an asset if you are able to produce more than 15 good images per week.

What I think is an underestimated advantage: Inspection standards are easier to consider in your process if you can focus on one site. Keywording is a bit different on IS as well compared to other sites, so you can spend more time on optimization. And you might find that on all sites different types of images sell a bit better or worse.

So in effect going exclusive allows you to optimize your work flows which might help for your individual success on that one side. But you're the only one who can judge if this is a viable path for you.


	Ignore \| Logged

Gannet77

« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2009, 07:09 »

#link

Certainly I never noticed any obvious bump in sales upon going exclusive - as you can upload more you may increase downloads as a result of building your portfolio faster, but just for being exclusive, I don't think you should expect that. Over time it may be so, as iStock do say they will promote exclusives, but as an immediate increase, no. Maybe others have different experiences though.

As for best match placement, as Michael says, you shouldn't consider that as a reason, it may be so sometimes but it can change.

Nor am I convinced by the faster inspection = better placement argument; I think the age factor in the best match is based on the inspection date/time, not the upload date. I think that because, when I had two images uploaded at the same time, one went to "Pending Executive" and was thus delayed before being accepted, but when it did appear it was positioned well ahead of the other, which had been accepted a week or more earlier. But I don't know that for sure, it's just supposition.


	Ignore \| Logged

antoniodalbore

« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2009, 12:48 »

#link

Hi YuLiang,

yes, going exclusive to IS might help for sure to increase your Sales.
Two factors here to consider: 50 images to be uploaded weekly, faster approval times.

In my specific case I decided to go exclusive since the first day with IS: I do already shoot RM for other agencies and need only another place where to promote my RF imagery.

Please do your own judgment on the matter and don't forget that as already pointed out, there are many people here making good business being NOT EXCLUSIVE and submitting good RF Stock images to many Agencies.

Hope will help.

Bye!

Quote from: yuliang11 on May 28, 2009, 22:37

hi,
For those has gone exclusive , i'm interested to know if your sales goes up on IS if u go exclusive? thanks


	Ignore \| Logged

yuliang11

« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2009, 01:16 »

#link

thank you all for the helpful replies.


	Ignore \| Logged

Zeus

« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2009, 09:26 »

#link

I think the most obvious reason, to me anyway, not to go exclusive is the inability to submit RF to other agencies, especially in the macro market. True enough that you get access to Getty RF, which it itself is a good thing but the overall disadvantages outweigh the advantages. I think that in the short term it has more advantages but as your career progresses it will bog you down, leaving is hard because of the sudden loss of income.


	Ignore \| Logged

ShadySue

Premium Member

« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2009, 09:38 »

#link

Note that you don't automatically bet access to Getty RF(Photodisc), you have to be at least an iStock Silver, then Getty has to accept you. Not everyone is accepted in their first few attempts.
As to the original question: it's hard to say. You get more upload slots; it depends how well you use them.
Yuri seems to do OK though not exclusive!


	Ignore \| Logged

azurelaroux

« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2009, 10:46 »

#link

You won't know if it works for you or not until you try. When I went exclusive on IS my sales tanked. There were months where I made less then I had as a non-exclusive only uploading to IS in preparation for exclusivity. My sales never recovered and I eventually left.


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	macrostock and exlusivity General Macrostock	Stepunk	2	1265	February 15, 2007, 08:42 by eendicott
	Zymmetrical increases commision to 70% « 1 2 » Zymmetrical.com	ZymmMan	25	3953	October 17, 2007, 12:01 by ALTPhotoImages
	Making the front page at SS increases your sales « 1 2 » Shutterstock.com	litifeta	26	3513	June 16, 2008, 13:12 by Mormegil
	How long before Crestock increases subs commissions? Crestock.com	ironarrow	15	2419	August 30, 2008, 09:36 by stokfoto
	Istock increases prices for the buyers..dollor bin scrapped..new premier add iStockPhoto.com	shank_ali	2	1335	December 09, 2008, 14:48 by shank_ali

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.7
Fotolia	34.9
Dreamstime	26.7

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.6
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.2
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.7
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4.1
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.8
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
iRockStock
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex
Imagegate
ViscoImages

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-26

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]