MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: iStock Royalty Statements - Published in August  (Read 3477 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

« on: August 18, 2017, 15:14 »
+2
bad month am very disappointed 38 dl for 15 dollars  :( :( am not exclusive am new at istock 4 month for the first payment this is normal ??
« Last Edit: August 18, 2017, 15:27 by sigoisette »


Bad Company

« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2017, 16:12 »
+2
bad month am very disappointed 38 dl for 15 dollars  :( :( am not exclusive am new at istock 4 month for the first payment this is normal ??

Sorry, I don't have a crystal ball to let you if this normal for you  8)


« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2017, 16:20 »
0
bad month am very disappointed 38 dl for 15 dollars  :( :( am not exclusive am new at istock 4 month for the first payment this is normal ??

Sorry, I don't have a crystal ball to let you if this normal for you  8)

hhhhhh okey

« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2017, 16:40 »
+4
I am wondering why the improved royalties.  Could it be that the old way they managed finances was flawed?  I really don't see new customers being the trigger and I don't buy the reduction in assets being the cause of my work magically being purchased.  I made over $500 which was about $45 more than last month. Three months ago I made over $600 there.  Strange.  Even though I made over $500 it was not nearly enough to make up for the horrible month I had on SS, which was $350 less than my average.  Nonetheless, the rest of the year might be an indication of whether this will sustain itself for a couple of more years. Not going to hold my breath, though. But I will take the doe.  IS tied with SS for July....never before in 10 years has this happened.

Bad Company

« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2017, 16:41 »
0
I you want us to give you a valid opinion than we need to see your portfolio to determine the quality, volume and keywords.  I made like $10 my first month back in 2011. It takes time- like years to get good results.



« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2017, 21:12 »
0
I am wondering why the improved royalties.  Could it be that the old way they managed finances was flawed?  I really don't see new customers being the trigger and I don't buy the reduction in assets being the cause of my work magically being purchased.

CONSPIRACY THEORY: Perhaps iStock reads these forums, and tweaks the algorithm so that some members get better results. That way they're less likely to complain, and more likely to say nice things about iStock.

Bad Company

« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2017, 22:13 »
0
I am wondering why the improved royalties.  Could it be that the old way they managed finances was flawed?  I really don't see new customers being the trigger and I don't buy the reduction in assets being the cause of my work magically being purchased.

CONSPIRACY THEORY: Perhaps iStock reads these forums, and tweaks the algorithm so that some members get better results. That way they're less likely to complain, and more likely to say nice things about iStock.

Than I must not be a member since my sales for July sucked  :-[


« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2017, 23:27 »
0
just slighty fewer than July
July slighty fewer than May
but my portofolio images increases over time :(

« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2017, 02:26 »
+4
Wow! Probably my WME on iStock/Getty
(I don't even want to verify)

« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2017, 02:30 »
+2
IS earned more then SS - for the first time in 8 years

« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2017, 02:53 »
+3
It rather looks as though IS has changed its Algorithm substantially of course this is a good thing if your sales have gone up as it illustrates what a great photographer you are.  Of course if your sales are down clearly IS are rigging their search in a disgraceful attempt to favour certain contributors.  ???

« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2017, 03:08 »
0
July earnings on istock were higher compared to Fotolia, which was unthinkable a year ago. It was also my second best month.

« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2017, 04:06 »
0
July earnings on istock were higher compared to Fotolia, which was unthinkable a year ago. It was also my second best month.

Me too but it's because FT is down (dead?) . :(
My best result in July was DT. IS is low but like other months.

« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2017, 13:25 »
0
BME on IS. Mostly due to an $80 subscription royalty. I had <20 images get less than .28 cents (and some of those were Getty sales) but I have to say that the $80 sub really goes a long way into reducing my grumbles about their system. My average sub sale since they implemented the system is over 50 cents, nearly twice what I would have gotten with a flat rate.


**Update: I just checked my raw file today instead of todayis20 and realized that this $80 was from Getty not the sub package. My average is still over 50 cents per sub, better than the nonexclusive rate of 28 cents. But I didn't want to leave inaccurate info posted.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 10:21 by Stock Wife »

« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2017, 18:57 »
0
Has the royalty statement for this month (dated Aug. 1) been posted yet? The last one I can see in my account is the one dated July 1. I thought it would come out on Friday since the 20th is on a Sunday, but I'm not seeing anything.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #15 on: August 19, 2017, 19:14 »
0
Has the royalty statement for this month (dated Aug. 1) been posted yet? The last one I can see in my account is the one dated July 1. I thought it would come out on Friday since the 20th is on a Sunday, but I'm not seeing anything.
No, the one which is came out yesterday (before the weekend) was for July.
Obviously the statement for August can't come out before the end of the month, and as always will come out on or around the 20th of the following month, i.e. September.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #16 on: August 19, 2017, 19:20 »
+1
BMY for $$, though only by 20c. Effectively, July and May tied dead even for dls and rpd.
Still, although $$ are 16% up on June '17, they're 16% down on July 2016, and it's my new worst July for $$ and dls since July 2007, pre-exclusivity.

drd

« Reply #17 on: August 20, 2017, 04:01 »
0
BME on IS. Mostly due to an $80 subscription royalty. I had <20 images get less than .28 cents (and some of those were Getty sales) but I have to say that the $80 sub really goes a long way into reducing my grumbles about their system. My average sub sale since they implemented the system is over 50 cents, nearly twice what I would have gotten with a flat rate.

That $80 subscription royalty is probably a mistake and expect a refund next month!

« Reply #18 on: August 20, 2017, 05:14 »
+2
My best-selling image this year is of an eclipse.

I should imagine sales of that will plunge after Monday.


« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2017, 08:58 »
0
BME on IS. Mostly due to an $80 subscription royalty. I had <20 images get less than .28 cents (and some of those were Getty sales) but I have to say that the $80 sub really goes a long way into reducing my grumbles about their system. My average sub sale since they implemented the system is over 50 cents, nearly twice what I would have gotten with a flat rate.

That $80 subscription royalty is probably a mistake and expect a refund next month!

Could be but I have had plenty of over $20 royalties over subs over the last few months.

« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2017, 20:27 »
0
Has the royalty statement for this month (dated Aug. 1) been posted yet? The last one I can see in my account is the one dated July 1. I thought it would come out on Friday since the 20th is on a Sunday, but I'm not seeing anything.
No, the one which is came out yesterday (before the weekend) was for July.
Obviously the statement for August can't come out before the end of the month, and as always will come out on or around the 20th of the following month, i.e. September.

Thanks for the info. I had a brain cramp about the weird reporting schedule.

5 bucks short of a payout. Disappointing since I thought I'd get over the finish line this month based on the number of sales. It's really annoying not having a running earnings tab. There's really no excuse for it.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #21 on: August 21, 2017, 03:20 »
0
They're not making any excuses. That's just how it is, end of.  >:(

« Reply #22 on: August 21, 2017, 09:37 »
0
In last three months, IS has passed Shutterstock in both downloads, earnings and average royalty per image in my case.




« Reply #23 on: August 21, 2017, 10:14 »
+1
They're not making any excuses. That's just how it is, end of.  >:(

I know (sigh). It doesn't make me any less annoyed.

« Reply #24 on: August 21, 2017, 10:49 »
0
I stopped uploading 10 months ago and they're not trying to make me change opinion...

6 DLs for a whopping 0.62 $ total  >:(


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
5565 Views
Last post September 09, 2010, 19:38
by madelaide
15 Replies
3497 Views
Last post September 12, 2010, 10:34
by ichiro17
iStock royalty cut goes live

Started by helix7 « 1 2 3 4  All » iStockPhoto.com

85 Replies
17236 Views
Last post January 24, 2011, 12:54
by ShadySue
89 Replies
10684 Views
Last post September 27, 2013, 19:47
by tickstock
3 Replies
1601 Views
Last post October 30, 2015, 13:47
by Microstock Posts

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors