Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 11:11

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print

Topic: losing the will to continue  

(Read 3024 times)
crazychristina


iStock Gauge
« Reply #25 on: May 20, 2009, 15:51 »

Fashions change too. Even in conservative business environments accessories change (eyeglasses for example), and what designer would use an image of an attractive businesswoman wearing last years frames?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
stockastic


« Reply #26 on: May 20, 2009, 16:09 »

Yes eventually styles change and stock photos taken 10 years ago no longer cut it. 

With regard to image quality the situation is less clear.  Magazine pages aren't getting any bigger, offset printing resolution isn't increasing (correct me if I'm wrong) and as content migrates to the web, resolution is even less important than it was on paper.

CD audio quality (12 bits at 50 kHz I think) turned out to be more than good enough for most people - higher definition audio formats never sold, and todays downloaded MP3s aren't particularly high quality.  So while a 4 MP image is definitely out of date, it's not clear that 12MP won't be enough, anytime soon.


Ignore | Logged


helix7


« Reply #27 on: May 20, 2009, 23:41 »

Every microstock site will continue to take quality both in terms of technical excellence and image subject because they have no reason not too, to think otherwise is just completely daft. Quality has, does & always will be accepted and sell.

A lot of microstock sites have stopped accepting the crap they used to, that's all that has changed.

100% agreed, and phrased better than I could have put it. Smiley

I'm fine with the increased quality standards, and as someone who also buys microstock images, I'm glad some effort is being put into raising the bar on quality. A lot of crap (especially in the vector categories) has gotten into the collections, and it's a real effort to dig through some of the garbage to find usable images. If it's harder to get images accepted at istock now, I say good, and it should always get harder. If your work is worth buying, it will continue to get accepted. I think microstock agencies are just cutting back on the mediocre junk that floods the searches, and buyers will be thankful for it. I know that I'm happy to see this shift in the business.



Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Losing Patience Fast « 1 2 »
LuckyOliver.com
DanP68 40 6659 Last post March 08, 2008, 14:55
by tsmarkley
Continue Uploads to SV?
Veer
Zeus 9 1183 Last post April 22, 2009, 14:40
by Brian O'Shea
Losing my enthusiasm for Veer « 1 2 3 4 »
Veer
lisafx 77 8898 Last post November 05, 2009, 01:02
by FD
I can't win for losing
General Stock Discussion
WarrenPrice 17 1827 Last post January 14, 2010, 07:54
by PowerDroid
Yuri admits he's losing money ! « 1 2 ... 8 9 »
General Stock Discussion
macrosaur 208 19795 Last post June 11, 2010, 18:40
by Zeus

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc