Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 11:22

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Mysterious iStockphoto banner ads featuring my photos  

(Read 999 times)
Danybot


« on: December 07, 2011, 21:04 »

I've recently found when I am in various web pages, I see an istock banner ad that features several thumbnails, one or two of which are always from my portfolio.  The first time I saw this I thought, "Isn't it wonderful.   Out of 9 million photos, they chose one of mine to feature in their ad."

However, this was in a browser when I was logged into my iStock account.   When I switched to a different browser, and went to the same websites, no more iStock ad at all, with or without my photos.

The ads are obviously being triggered by cookies on my computer.   Is this another example of really poor policy, where they are wasting money in streaming ads to the person who is 100% certain not to buy the photo being shown, because he already owns it?  Or are they trying to trick us into feeling grateful towards them, and upload more photos to get a princely 17% commission?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2011, 21:07 »

http://seanlockephotography.com/2011/11/08/istock-serves-up-targeted-advertising/


Ignore | Logged


cclapper
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2011, 21:37 »

I've recently found when I am in various web pages, I see an istock banner ad that features several thumbnails, one or two of which are always from my portfolio.  The first time I saw this I thought, "Isn't it wonderful.   Out of 9 million photos, they chose one of mine to feature in their ad."

However, this was in a browser when I was logged into my iStock account.   When I switched to a different browser, and went to the same websites, no more iStock ad at all, with or without my photos.

The ads are obviously being triggered by cookies on my computer.   Is this another example of really poor policy, where they are wasting money in streaming ads to the person who is 100% certain not to buy the photo being shown, because he already owns it?  Or are they trying to trick us into feeling grateful towards them, and upload more photos to get a princely 17% commission?

All of the above?


Ignore | Logged


Danybot


« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2011, 21:47 »



Thanks, that explains it.   However, while Locke calls it "smart targetted advertising," that's obviously wrong.  It's a really dumb algorithm that somebody mistakenly thought was smart.


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2011, 21:50 »

Hmmm, let's see... Serving images to buyers after they had seen them earlier to entice them back vs. the cost of contributors who have nothing better to do than look at their ports.  Probably worth the money.


Ignore | Logged


Suljo


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2011, 22:09 »

Serving images to buyers...

Serving?!
this is not in iStock,s CW
Under Serving did you mean tennis shoot  Grin


Ignore | Logged


Newsfocus1
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2011, 04:44 »

As well as Seans concise explanation, next time you see one of these, click on the little "i" at the top right of the advert - you get a whole page explaining why and how it works. Very clever and, I would think, effective marketing. The same thing happens on my own blog, sometimes instead of the regular Google ads down the side I get a banner advert related to something I have looked at on the internet recently (not always something I would own up to either Wink. Regards, David.


Ignore | Logged


hoi ha


« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2011, 20:07 »

Hmmm, let's see... Serving images to buyers after they had seen them earlier to entice them back vs. the cost of contributors who have nothing better to do than look at their ports.  Probably worth the money.

Not to mention the buyers who will think the photo(s) they may be interested in buying are already being used for another campaign and are hence overexposed, prompting them not to buy.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2011, 20:22 »

I'm using Firefox with Adblock and third-party "harvesting" cookies blocked. Moreover, daily AVG goes through my history and deletes those that get through (the "smart" ones?) like the doubleclick parasites. I don't use IE since then hell breaks loose with ads and trackers all over. That's why I don't use Chrome too since it's probably one big tracking and spying machine as Google has direct access to your browsing behavior and your IP at the same time. Apart from the fact I don't like to be followed by creepy shadows at my back, all these invisible reloads cost me money since part of the time, I'm on Wifi volume billing.

But nevertheless, thanks to SLocke for the explanation.


Ignore | Logged


YadaYadaYada


iStock Gauge
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2011, 20:32 »

What a negative place. Its for buyers not us. It rememebrs what they searched for before and targets them with similar results. I builds sales and you complain.


Ignore | Logged


hoi ha


« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2011, 05:51 »

What a negative place. Its for buyers not us. It rememebrs what they searched for before and targets them with similar results. I builds sales and you complain.

I am a buyer


Ignore | Logged


Gannet77


iStock Gauge
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2011, 07:55 »

Another good blocker for FireFox is Ghostery (http://www.ghostery.com/) which should stop just about everything - unfortunately it'll even stop iStock referral links because of the third party redirection, which is perhaps not so good news for some!

And it helps speed too;  they have a page http://purplebox.ghostery.com/?p=1016022107 showing just how much some of the redirection, tracking cookies, analytics, etc. can actually slow down your page loads.


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
WIRED Article Featuring Bruce & Co.
Microstock News
Istock News 5 1074 Last post July 09, 2007, 16:47
by CJPhoto
How to create lightboxes banner at Istockphoto
iStockPhoto.com
erwinova 3 1518 Last post May 02, 2008, 05:48
by bittersweet
Mysterious sale at IS
iStockPhoto.com
madelaide 11 1115 Last post December 17, 2010, 15:31
by madelaide
Video from LeWeb featuring Oleg
Fotolia.com
RT 0 376 Last post January 07, 2011, 07:44
by RT
Ad Banner Design Challenge
Cutcaster
johngriffin 6 1477 Last post March 17, 2011, 05:03
by CD123

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc