Over 50 keywords and reset?!?

Suljo

« on: March 29, 2009, 19:25 »

#link

I just upload pic on iStock (cattle) and after 5 mins of choosing keywords directions for "disamagngle grrrrrrr" process an after submit I have message:
You cannot enter more than 50 unique keywords (single words or phrases)
And all my keywords are DISAPEAR?!?!
Nice "friendly to use, user friendly??? Wo do that for you learning??? We teach you??? and etc
Blah
iStock allways accented that they do for our knowlage or that this kind of crap is process of learning???
PUKE......
Now this mean that I must spend another 5 mins to limit my keywords and maybe after that again have "THAT educational" mesagge from iStock for dummies learning team again and fck my self like dog around the tree?!?
Thank you iStock I just learn that you are not user friendly and you allways try to * up you submitters on any way and steal from them 80% of income and * them for they 20% anyhow.
What a stupid assholes...........
Angry


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2009, 19:35 »

#link

Suljo,

I have a similar experience with IS. As it doesn't read my keywords anyway, now I only put a few keywords, don't even disambiguate them, and save. Then I go back to include all keywords and disambiguate. As I have to enter all fields manually, in my case an error is even worse, because title and description also disappear.

Just a note: I don't understand why you always have to mention this "iStock" joke.

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

Suljo

« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2009, 20:37 »

#link

Quote from: madelaide on March 29, 2009, 19:35

Suljo,

Just a note: I don't understand why you always have to mention this "iStock" joke.

Regards,
Adelaide

I know evolution from bacteria to human is long process, but small things make people happy, but from iStock I dont expect nothing, even worse than before.
I cross over from that that they even more dont support ITPC or EXIF data because they make they system complicated even worse than Windows by themselves. They loose to much energy to * up with everybody in they chain list wich generate more and more unsatisfied users.
I understand that some people think that they understand and love complicated things but this is offull.
Just no make sense and any kind of taste.
Sorry if I am so rude but I am sereously disapointed with them.
I am the first for some kind of standardization but they are most unpredictable of other BIG 4 or 6 in acceptance process.
I just dont even think what they are think that they are. I Just send them by innertion in the same time just to see new stupidnes of rejecton or othervise why the accept something.
Just for fun
Sorry on my bad English, hope you understand.
I wrote my last post because I was angry of non user friendly interface.
After few months was story that trere is some kind of Glitch in syste so they dont support ITPC data.
They dont fix that jet and even worse make this thing from my first post.
Very unprofesional from company which are trying to be No 1.
No1 for Fcking submiters?!?


	Ignore \| Logged

« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2009, 21:06 »

#link

It's interesting how different people have such different experiences and opinions.

Some of my positive feelings towards iStock are probably due to the fact that they have always been my #1 earner. But I also enjoy the online community there (well, most of it), and I actually believe their reviews are among the most consistent of any of the Big 6. That doesn't mean I don't get rejections I disagree with; I most certainly do. But far fewer than the two currently in my doghouse, Fotolia & Dreamstime.

As for the uploading process, I love it. Roll Eyes

But maybe that's because I've been using DeepMeta for over a year. Man, what a wonderful program. Anyone who doesn't like iStock's uploading process (which would be about everyone, I'd think) should be using DeepMeta, IMO.


	Ignore \| Logged

sjlocke

« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2009, 21:49 »

#link

Yes, it's a bug that if you mess up while adding meta data, like over 50 keywords, or duplicate keywords, everything disappears.


	Ignore \| Logged

goldenangel

« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2009, 22:02 »

#link

Keywording is pain enough with DeepMeta. I can't see why anyone would bother with uploading using the website unless not using a PC. I only did it the very first day I was approved on IStock and that convinced me very fast I needed to look for another solution


	Ignore \| Logged

null

« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2009, 22:21 »

#link

Quote from: Suljo on March 29, 2009, 19:25

Now this mean that I must spend another 5 mins to limit my keywords and maybe after that again have "THAT educational" mesagge from iStock for dummies learning team again and fck my self like dog around the tree?!?

Dario, I hope you feel better now. And when you cooled down, download and use deepmeta for uploading to Istockphoto without getting a tantrum Shocked


« Last Edit: March 29, 2009, 22:40 by FlemishDreams »	Ignore \| Logged

sharpshot

« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2009, 02:48 »

#link

They reject for inappropriate keywords and that is more likely with 50 of them. I was annoyed when all my keywords disappeared but now I think it is a good thing. It takes me 30 seconds to enter the minimum 5 keywords and I never get a rejection for inappropriate ones. I only have to add more if the image is accepted. I hope this bug never gets fixed


	Ignore \| Logged

Suljo

« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2009, 05:47 »

#link

Quote from: FlemishDreams on March 29, 2009, 22:21

Quote from: Suljo on March 29, 2009, 19:25

Dario, I hope you feel better now. And when you cooled down, download and use deepmeta for uploading to Istockphoto without getting a tantrum Shocked

There is no version for Mac OS X jet...


	Ignore \| Logged

rimglow

« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2009, 09:55 »

#link

ProStockPhoto works like a charm on a Mac


	Ignore \| Logged

louoates

« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2009, 12:50 »

#link

Uploading to IS is like living with an ingrown toenail. I get the disappearing keywords all the time for various undetermined reasons. That coupled with IS not reading my keyword data from my file is just plain inexcusable contributor relations. There's even a goofy thing going on with the categories disappearing sometimes.

If they didn't make me more money than the others they'd be just an unpleasant memory -- sort of like Lucky Oliver who at least got the uploading right.